Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T00:33:47.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference Periods of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles E. Snipes ,
Joe E. Street  and
Robert H. Walker
Charles E. Snipes
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Joe E. Street
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was grown in the presence of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L. # XANST) on a Lucedale fine sandy loam. Cotton was maintained weed free or allowed to compete with common cocklebur for 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 weeks after planting. Mathematical predictions of seed cotton yield were optimum when maintained free from common cocklebur interference for 8 weeks or more after cotton emergence in 1981 and 1982, and 10 weeks or more in 1980. Common cocklebur adversely affected yield when allowed to compete longer than 4 weeks in 1981 and 1982, and 2 weeks in 1980.

Keywords

Weed biologythresholdcompetitionXANST
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , July 1987 , pp. 529 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brown, S. M., Whitwell, T., and Street, J. E. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:503–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.Google Scholar
5. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.Google Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McLaughlin, R. D. 1977. Competition of prickly sida with cotton. Weed Sci. 25:106–110.Google Scholar
7. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:258–262.Google Scholar
8. Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Influence of time of planting and distance from the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) row of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on competitiveness with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:568–572.Google Scholar
9. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
10. Chandler, J. M. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1983. Yields of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars as influenced by spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition. Weed Sci. 31:303–307.Google Scholar
11. Higgins, J. M., Walker, R. H., and Whitwell, T. 1986. Coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:52–56.Google Scholar
12. Ivy, H. W. and Baker, R. S. 1972. Prickly sida control and competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137–139.Google Scholar
13. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Influence of yellow nutsedge competition on furrow-irrigated cotton. Weed Sci. 23:171–175.Google Scholar
14. Newsom, L. D. and Brazzel, J. R. 1968. Pests and their control. Pages 367–405 in Elliot, F. C., Hoover, M., and Porter, W. K., eds. Advances in Production and Utilization of Quality Cotton: Principles and Practices. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
15. Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Peterson, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 66:205–207.Google Scholar
17. Reynolds, H. T., Adkisson, P. L., and Smith, R. F. 1975. Cotton insect pest management. Pages 379–443 in Metcalf, R. L. and Luckman, W., eds. Introduction to Insect Pest Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
18. Robinson, E. L. 1976. Yield and height of cotton as affected by weed density and nitrogen level. Weed Sci. 24:40–42.Google Scholar
19. Robinson, E. L. 1976. Effect of weed species and placement on seed cotton yields. Weed Sci. 24:353–355.Google Scholar
20. Rogers, N. K., Buchanan, G. A., and Johnson, W. G. 1976. Influence of row spacing on weed competition with cotton. Weed Sci. 24:410–413.Google Scholar
21. Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum) Weed Sci. 33:810–814.Google Scholar
22. Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33:815–818.Google Scholar
23. Snipes, C. E., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30: 553–556.Google Scholar
24. Street, J. E., Snipes, C. E., McGuire, J. A., and Buchanan, G. A. 1985. Competition of a binary weed system with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:807–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar