Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T06:35:54.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Herbicides on Japanese Holly and Hand Labor for Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. W. Bingham*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg

Abstract

Fall treatments with 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) as opposed to cultivation during the growing season reduced hand labor requirements more than 70% for weed control in Japanese holly (Ilex crenata Thumb. Rotundifolia Hort.). The response of Japanese holly to simazine varied from superior growth and quality to severe injury and death. Simazine plus 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (amitrole) resulted in better control of small weeds than simazine alone in late winter or early spring. Dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA), N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenylacetamide (diphenamid), and 2,6-dichlobenzonitrile (dichlobenil) reduced labor requirements for control of annual weeds without any visual response on the Japanese holly. In certain instances, rotations of herbicides were effective for broad spectrum weed control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1961. Chemical control of weeds in nursery plantings. Connecticut Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. No. 638. 41 p.Google Scholar
2. Bingham, S. W. 1968. Economic evaluations for weed control in fieldlined woody ornamental nursery crops. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 92:704712.Google Scholar
3. Bingham, S. W. 1964. Flute-feed applicator for granular herbicides. Weeds 12:5859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bingham, S. W. 1962. Herbicides reduce labor required in woody ornamental nursery crops. Peninsula Hort. Soc. (trans.) 52:3233.Google Scholar
5. Bingham, S. W. and Jones, J. R. 1967. Phytotoxicity of certain herbicides to several woody ornamentals. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91:786791.Google Scholar
6. Chadwick, L. C. 1960. Response of some woody ornamental plants transplanted to soil immediately after application of simazine. Proc. NCWCC 17:50.Google Scholar
7. Fink, R. J. and Fletchall, O. 1967. The influence of atrazine or simazine on forage yield and nitrogen components of corn. Weeds 15:272274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gramlich, J. V. and Davis, D. E. 1967. Effect of atrazine on nitrogen metabolism of resistant species. Weeds 15:157160.Google Scholar
9. Havis, J. R., Bennett, W. J., and Fitzgerald, R. D. 1965. Herbicide combinations for summer weeds in nursery crops. Proc. NEWCC 19:155159.Google Scholar
10. Holm, L. G. and Taylorson, R. 1955. Mixtures of herbicides for nursery weed control. Proc. NCWCC 12:5152.Google Scholar
11. Raugh, F. D., Crabtree, G., and Freed, V. H. 1966. The differential response of Ligustrum ovalifolium and Pyracantha spp. to simazine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 88:678683.Google Scholar
12. Ries, S. K. and Gast, A. 1965. The effect of simazine on nitrogenous components of corn. Weeds 13:272274.Google Scholar
13. Ries, S. K., Grigby, B. H., and Davidson, H. 1959. Evaluation of herbicides for several species of ornamentals. Weeds 7:409417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ries, S. K., Larsen, R. P., and Kenworthy, A. L. 1963. The apparent influence of simazine on nitrogen nutrition of peach and apple trees. Weeds 11:270273.Google Scholar
15. Saidak, W. J. and Nelson, S. H. 1962. Weed control in ornamental nurseries. Weeds 10:311315.Google Scholar
16. Sherwood, L. V. and Kemmerer, H. B. 1965. The influence of winter applied preemergence herbicides on weed growth among woody ornamental plants. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 85:657662.Google Scholar
17. Taylor, J. L. 1963. Preemergence weed control in field grown woody ornamental plants. Proc. SWC 16:145155.Google Scholar