Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T13:15:13.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Temperature, Photoperiod, and Population Source on the Growth of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Patterson ,
E. P. Flint  and
Ray Dickens
D. T. Patterson
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
E. P. Flint
Affiliation:
Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
Ray Dickens
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. & Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36830
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Responses of the vegetative growth of cogongrass [Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.] to temperature and photoperiod were studied in plants grown from stem and rhizome propagules collected from plants originating at four locations in southern Alabama and Mississippi. The plants were grown in four controlled-environment chambers with day/night temperature regimes of 23/17 C and 29/23 C, photoperiods of 12 h and 16 h, and photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) of 650 μE(einsteins)m−2s−1. After 87 days, heights, leaf areas, total dry weights, rhizome numbers, and rhizome dry weights were significantly greater in plants grown at 29/23 C than at 23/17 C. Total dry weights, rhizome numbers, and rhizome dry weights were greater at the 16-h photoperiod than at 12 h. Plants grown from propagules from the McNeil, Mississippi population, which originated from an introduction from the Philippines, were significantly smaller than plants grown from propagules collected from populations thought to have originated from an introduction of cogongrass from Japan. Mathematical analysis of the growth data showed that the observed differences in dry matter production were more closely related to differences in leaf area duration than to differences in net assimilation rate.

Keywords

Growth analysisexotic weed
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 1980 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, H. A. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. and System. 5:1–24.Google Scholar
2. Dickens, R. 1974. Cogongrass in Alabama after sixty years. Weed Sci. 22:177–179.Google Scholar
3. Freese, F. 1967. Elementary statistical methods for foresters. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 317. 87 pp.Google Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Agnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Serv. Cir. No. 547. 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. B., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. 609 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hubbard, C. E. 1955. Taxonomy, description and distribution of species and varieties. Pages 5–13 in Imperata cylindrica. Taxonomy, Distribution, Economic Significance and Control. Imperial Agric. Bur. Joint Publ. No. 7, Imperial Bur. Pastures and Forage Crops, Aberystwyth, Wales.Google Scholar
7. Kramer, P. J., Hellmers, H., and Downs, R. J. 1970. SEPEL: new phytotrons for environmental research. BioScience 20:1201–1208.Google Scholar
8. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343–391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
9. Parker, C. 1976. Prediction of new weed problems, especially in the developing world. Pages 249–264 in. Cherrett, J. M. and Sagar, G. R., eds., Origins of Pest, Parasite, Disease and Weed Problems. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
10. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1979. Effects of simulated field temperatures and chilling on itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata), corn (Zea mays), and soybean (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 27:645–650.Google Scholar
11. Patterson, D. T., Meyer, C. R., Flint, E. P., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1979. Temperature responses and potential distribution of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:77–82.Google Scholar
12. Patterson, D. T., Terrell, E. E., and Dickens, R. 1979. Cogongrass in Mississippi. Mississippi Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. (In press).Google Scholar
13. Pendleton, R. L. 1948. Cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica, in the Western Hemisphere. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40:1043–1049.Google Scholar
14. Small, J. K. 1933. Manual of the Southeastern Flora. J. K. Small, New York, 1554 pp.Google Scholar
15. Tabor, P. 1949. Cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv., in the southeastern United States. Agron. J. 41:270.Google Scholar
16. Tabor, P. 1952. Cogongrass in Mobile County, Alabama. Agron. J. 44:50.Google Scholar
17. Tabor, P. 1952. Comments on cogon and torpedo grasses: A challenge to weed workers. Weeds 1:374–375.Google Scholar