Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:50:54.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Fall Burning of Chaparral Woodland on Soil Residues of Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas N. Johnsen Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., Agric. Res., 2000 E. Allen Road, Tucson, AZ 85719
William L. Warskow
Affiliation:
Watershed Division, Salt River Project, P.O. Box 1980, Phoenix, AZ 85001

Abstract

Residue of picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) aerially sprayed onto a central Arizona chaparral stand was markedly reduced in the surface 7.6 cm of soil from a fall burn conducted 5 weeks later. Brush control was also reduced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1970. Comparison of salt and ester formulations of picloram. Weed Sci. 18:447451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Miller, F. R. 1969. Effect of activated carbon on the phytotoxicity of herbicides in a tropical soil. Weed Sci. 17:189192.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W. and Scifres, C. J. 1971. Residual characteristics of picloram in grassland ecosystems. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-1111. 24 pp.Google Scholar
4. DeBono, L. F., Dunn, P. H., and Conrad, C. E. 1977. Fire's effect on physical and chemical properties of chaparral soils. Pages 6574 in Symposium on environmental consequences of fire and fuel management in Mediterranean ecosystems. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-3.Google Scholar
5. Genter, W. A. 1964. Herbicidal activity of vapors of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid. Weeds 12:239240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Grover, R. 1971. Adsorption of picloram by soil colloids and various other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 19:417418.Google Scholar
7. Hance, R. J. 1969. Further observations of the decomposition of herbicides in soil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 20:144145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lindenmuth, A. W. Jr. and Glendening, G. E. 1962. Controlled burning of Arizona chaparral – A 1962 progress report. Pages 2324 in The Arizona watershed program in review. Proc. 6th Annu. Watershed Symp. Google Scholar
9. Merkle, M. G., Bovey, R. W., and Davis, F. S. 1967. Factors affecting the persistence of picloram in soil. Agron. J. 59:413415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pase, C. P. and Glendening, G. E. 1965. Reduction of litter and shrub crowns by planned fall burning of oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Note RM. 49. 2 pp.Google Scholar
11. Pase, C. P. and Lindemuth, A. W. Jr. 1971. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation and sediment in oak-mountain mahogany chaparral. J. For. 69:800805.Google Scholar
12. Weed Science Society of America. 1979. Picloram. Pages 342345 in Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. 4th ed. WSSA, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
13. Youngson, C. R., Goring, C. A. I., Meikle, R. W., Scott, H. H. and Griffith, J. D. 1967. Factors influencing the decomposition of TORDON herbicides in soils. Down Earth 23(2):311.Google Scholar