Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T13:13:09.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of AMA on Synthesis and Utilization of Food Reserves in Purple Nutsedge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. L. Duble
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Overton, Texas
E. C. Holt
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Science Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Abstract

Chemical analyses for carbohydrates, fats, and protein and C14O2 tracer techniques were employed to study the influence of repeated applications of amine methylarsonate (hereinafter referred to as AMA) on food reserves in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Purple nutsedge plants were grown under greenhouse conditions and treated at 3-week intervals with an aqueous solution of AMA. Chemical analyses suggested that repeated applications of AMA accelerated starch hydrolysis in tubers but had little effect on the fat and protein content. The disappearance of starch was correlated with an increase in the arsenic (hereinafter referred to as As) content of tubers following repeated applications. In leaf tissue, applications of AMA significantly reduced the sugar content and increased the protein content. Tracer studies on the rate of C14O2 fixation and evolution suggested that, in general, AMA-treated plants had a higher rate of utilization of the products of photosynthesis than untreated plants. Apparently, the carbohydrate fraction of food reserves was utilized in preference to fats and protein.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis, 10th Ed. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem., Washington, D. C. 957 p.Google Scholar
2. Benson, A. A., Basham, J. A., Calvin, M., Goodall, T. C., Hass, V. A., and Stepka, W. 1950. Paper chromatography coupled with radioautography in the identification of radioactive compounds in plant extracts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72:17101718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chase, G. D. and Rabinowitz, J. L. 1964. Principles of Radioactive Methodology. Burgess Publ. Co. Minneapolis, Minn. 372 p.Google Scholar
4. Davies, D. D., Giovanelli, J., and Rees, T. Ap 1964. Plant Biochemistry. Davis Publ. Co. Philadelphia, Pa. 454 p.Google Scholar
5. Duble, R. L., Holt, E. C., and McBee, G. G. 1968. The translocation of two organic arsenicals in purple nutsedge. Weeds 16:421424.Google Scholar
6. Holt, E. C., Long, J. A., and Allen, W. W. 1962. Control of nutsedge in bermudagrass turf. Weeds 10:285287.Google Scholar
7. Holt, E. C., Faubion, J. L., Allen, W. W., and McBee, G. G. 1967. Arsenic translocation in nutsedge tuber systems and its effect on tuber viability. Weeds 15:1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Morrison, J. J. 1961. The determination of total arsenic in medicated feeds using silver diethyldithiocarbamate. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 44:740741.Google Scholar
9. Thimann, K. V. and Bonner, W. D. 1949. Experiments on the growth and inhibition of isolated plant parts. Am. J. Botany. 36:214221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H., and Stauffer, J. F. 1964. Manometric Techniques and Tissue Metabolism. Burgess Publ. Co. Minneapolis, Minn. 305 p.Google Scholar