Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T03:46:37.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Seed Dormancy Play a Role in the Germination Ecology of Rumex crispus?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jerry M. Baskin  and
Carol C. Baskin
Jerry M. Baskin
Affiliation:
School of Biol. Sci., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506–0225
Carol C. Baskin
Affiliation:
School of Biol. Sci., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506–0225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed dormancy does not play a role in the germination ecology of curly dock (Rumex crispus L. ♯ RUMCR). This study confirms reports that freshly matured seeds are nondormant, and it shows that buried seeds exposed to natural seasonal temperature changes remain nondormant. From October 1981 through June 1983, seeds exhumed at monthly intervals germinated 80 to 100% at all thermo-periods. These results do not support suggestions that seeds of curly dock buried in soil enter dormancy. However, the results do explain why seeds of this species in the Beal and Duvel buried-seed experiments germinated when exhumed at various times during the growing season.

Keywords

Buried seedslight-requiring seedsviabilityRUMCR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 340 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1977. Dormancy and germination in seeds of common ragweed with reference to Beal's buried seed experiment. Am. J. Bot. 64:1174–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1978. A contribution to the germination ecology of Rumex crispus L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 105:278–281.Google Scholar
3. Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1980. Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Ecology 61:475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Beal, W. J. 1884. The vitality of seeds. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 5:44–46.Google Scholar
5. Beal, W. J. 1885. The vitality of seeds buried in the soil. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 6:14–15.Google Scholar
6. Beal, W. J. 1889. Vitality and growth of seeds buried in soil. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 10:15–16.Google Scholar
7. Beal, W. J. 1894. The vitality of seeds buried in the soil. Agric. Sci. 8:283–284.Google Scholar
8. Beal, W. J. 1899. The vitality of seeds twenty years in the soil. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 20:86–87.Google Scholar
9. Beal, W. J. 1905a. The vitality of seeds. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 26:89–93.Google Scholar
10. Beal, W. J. 1905b. The vitality of seeds. Bot. Gaz. 40:140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Beal, W. J. 1911. The vitality of seeds buried in the soil. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 31:21–23.Google Scholar
12. Beal, W. J. 1915. The vitality of seeds buried in the soil. Proc. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. 36:25–27.Google Scholar
13. Bianco, J. 1973. Phytochrome et germination des semences de Rumex. Physiol. Plant. 28:61–66.Google Scholar
14. Cavers, P. B. 1974. Germination polymorphism in Rumex crispus. The effects of different storage conditions on germination responses of seeds collected from individual plants. Can. J. Bot. 52:575–583.Google Scholar
15. Cavers, P. B. and Harper, J. L. 1964. Rumex obtusifolius L. and R. crispus L. J. Ecol. 52:737–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Darlington, H. T. 1915. Dr. Beal's seed–vitality experiments. 17th Report. Mich. Acad. Sci. Pages 164–165.Google Scholar
17. Darlington, H. T. 1922. Dr. W. J. Beal's seed-viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 9:266–269.Google Scholar
18. Darlington, H. T. 1931. The 50-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 18:262–265.Google Scholar
19. Darlington, H. T. 1941. The 60-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 28:271–273.Google Scholar
20. Darlington, H. T. 1951. The 70-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 38:379–381.Google Scholar
21. Darlington, H. T. and Steinbauer, G. P. 1961. The 80-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 48:321–325.Google Scholar
22. Duvel, J.W.T. 1905. The vitality of buried seeds. USDA Bur. Plant Indust. Bull. No. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Gardner, W. A. 1921. Effect of light on germination of light-sensitive seeds. Bot. Gaz. 71:249–288.Google Scholar
24. Górski, T., Górska, K., and Nowicki, J. 1977. Germination of seeds of various herbaceous species under leaf canopy. Flora (Jena) 166:249–259.Google Scholar
25. Goss, W. L. 1924. The vitality of buried seeds. J. Agric. Res. 29:349–362.Google Scholar
26. Holm, L., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. Page 314. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
27. Holm, R. E. 1972. Volatile metabolites controlling germination in buried weed seeds. Plant Physiol. 50:293–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Kivilaan, A. and Bandurski, R. S. 1973. The 90-year period of Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 60:140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Kivilaan, A. and Bandurski, R. S. 1981. The one-hundred-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 68:1290–1292.Google Scholar
30. Le Deunff, Y. 1973. Interactions entre l'oxygène et la lumiere dans la germination et l'induction d'une dormance secondarie chez les semences de Rumex crispus L. Compt. Red. Acad. Paris (Series D) 276:2381–2384.Google Scholar
31. Le Deunff, Y. 1974. Hétérogénéité de la germination des semences de Rumex crispus mise en evidence et essai d'interprétation. Physiol. Plant. 32:342–346.Google Scholar
32. Le Deunff, Y. and Chaussant, R. 1968. Étude de la dormance secondaire des semences chez Rumex crispus L. Ann. Physiol. Vég. 10:227–236.Google Scholar
33. Lewis, J. 1973. Longevity of crop and weed seeds: Survival after 20 years in soil. Weed Res. 13:179–191.Google Scholar
34. Roberts, E. H. and Totterdell, S. 1981. Seed dormancy in Rumex species in response to environmental factors. Plant Cell Environ. 4:97–106.Google Scholar
35. Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E. 1980. Seed survival and periodicity of seedling emergence in some species of Atriplex, Chenopodium, Polygonum and Rumex . Ann. Appl. Biol. 94:111–120.Google Scholar
36. Salisbury, E. J. 1942. The weed problem. Nature 149:594–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Samimy, C. and Khan, A. A. 1983. Secondary dormancy, growth-regulator effects, and embryo growth potential in curly dock (Rumex crispus) seeds. Weed Sci. 31:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1972. Phytochrome control of germination of Rumex crispus L. seeds induced by temperature shifts. Plant Physiol. 50:645–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1973. Phytochrome transformation and action in seeds of Rumex crispus L. during secondary dormancy. Plant Physiol. 52:475–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Toole, E. H. and Brown, C. 1946. Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiment. J. Agric. Res. 72:201–210.Google Scholar
41. Totterdell, S. and Roberts, E. H. 1979. Effects of low temperatures on the loss of innate dormancy and the development of induced dormancy in seeds of Rumex obtusifolius L. and Rumex crispus L. Plant Cell Environ. 2:131–137.Google Scholar
42. Vincent, E. M. and Cavers, P. B. 1978. The effects of wetting and drying on the subsequent germination of Rumex crispus . Can. J. Bot. 56:2207–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. United States Department of Commerce. 1967–1976. Clima-tological data. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Environmental Data Service. Volumes 62–71.Google Scholar
44. Weaver, S. E. and Cavers, P. B. 1979. Dynamics of seed populations of Rumex crispus and Rumex obtusifolius (Polygonaceae) in disturbed and undisturbed soil. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:909–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar