Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:02:34.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Herbicide Inhibition of Photosynthetic Electron Transport by Fluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Edward P. Richard Jr. ,
John R. Goss ,
Charles J. Arntzen  and
Fred W. Slife
Edward P. Richard Jr.
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
John R. Goss
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Charles J. Arntzen
Affiliation:
MSU/DOE, Plant Res. Lab., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48823
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The kinetics of chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence was used as a tool for detecting herbicide inhibition in studies using intact soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] leaves. The terminal level of fluorescence (FT), obtained 150 s after the onset of illumination of the abaxial leaf surface, was found to be independent of the dark preadaptation interval and to vary little between leaflets and leaves within and among untreated plants. Increases in FT were detected in plants following the foliar application of herbicides which inhibit photosynthetic electron transport. Fluorescence measurements indicated significant electron transport inhibition in leaves following treatment with 40-mM solutions of either atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropyiamino)-s-triazine] or diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] after 0.5 and 1 h, respectively. Results of this study indicate that Chl fluorescence can be used to measure injury qualitatively by photosynthetic electron transport-inhibiting herbicides in intact plants long before visual symptoms of injury occur. Possible uses of this sensitive, rapid, and non-destructive technique for studying herbicide penetration as affected by adjuvants and environmental factors are discussed.

Keywords

Photosynthesisatrazinediuron
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 361 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H., Arntzen, C. J., and Stoller, E. W. 1981. Chlorophyll fluorescence assay for the determination of triazine resistance. Weed Sci. 29:316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Arntzen, C. J., Ditto, C. L., and Brewer, P. E. 1978. Chloroplast membrane alterations in triazine-resistant Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:278–282.Google Scholar
3. Bohme, H., Kunert, K. J., and Boger, P. 1981. Sites of herbicidal action on photosynthesis: A fluorescence assay study. Weed Sci. 29:371–373.Google Scholar
4. Ducrest, J. M. and Gasquez, J. 1978. Fluorescence as a means of detecting the chloroplastic resistance of Chenopodium album L. and Poa annua L. to atrazine. Chemosphere 7:691–696.Google Scholar
5. Izawa, S. 1977. Inhibitors of electron transport. Pages 266–282 in Trebst, A. and Avron, M., eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology New Series, Vol. 5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
6. Kok, B., Malkin, S., Owens, O., and Forbush, B. 1967. Observations on the reducing side of the O2-evolving photoact. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 19:446–459.Google Scholar
7. Melcarek, P. K. and Brown, G. N. 1977. Effects of chill stress on prompt and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence from leaves. Plant Physiol. 60:822–825.Google Scholar
8. Miles, C. D. and Danniel, D. J. 1973. A rapid screening technique for photosynthetic mutants of higher plants. Plant Sci. Lett. 1:227–240.Google Scholar
9. Mohanty, P. and Govindjee, . 1974. The slow decline and the subsequent rise of chlorophyll fluorescence transients in intact algal cells. Plant Biochem. J. 1:78–106.Google Scholar
10. Papageorgiou, G. 1975. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A intrinsic probe of photosynthesis. Pages 320–366 in Govindjee, ed. Bioenergetics of Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Schreiber, U., Fink, R., and Vidaver, W. 1977. Fluorescence induction in whole leaves: Differentiation between the two leaf sides and adaptation to different light regimes. Planta 133:121–129.Google Scholar
12. Schreiber, U., Groberman, L., and Vidaver, W. 1975. Portable solid-state fluorometer for the measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence induction in plants. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46:538–542.Google Scholar
13. Schreiber, U., Vidaver, W., Runeckles, V. C., and Rosen, P. 1978. Chlorophyll fluorescence assay for ozone injury in intact plants. Plant Physiol. 61:80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Sousa Machado, V., Arntzen, C. J., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, F. R. 1978. Comparative triazine effects upon system II photochemistry in chloroplasts of two common lamb-quarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Sci. 26:318–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tischer, W. and Strotmann, H. 1977. Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 460:113–125.Google Scholar
16. Walker, D. A. and Zelitch, I. 1963. Some aspects of metabolic inhibitors, temperature, and anaerobic conditions on stomatal movement. Plant Physiol. 38:390–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wills, G. D., Davis, D. E., and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1963. The effect of atrazine on transpiration in corn, cotton, and soybeans. Weeds 11:253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Zankel, K. L. and Kok, B. 1972. Estimation of pool sizes and kinetic constants. Pages 218–238 in San Pietro, A., ed. Methods of Enzymology, Vol. XXIV. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar