Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:55:10.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of Johnsongrass and Cocklebur with Six Soybean Varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. G. McWhorter  and
E. E. Hartwig
C. G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Stoneville, Mississippi 38776
E. E. Hartwig
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Stoneville, Mississippi 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heavy infestations of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) reduced the yield of six soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) varieties 23 to 42% with both hand-harvesting and mechanical-harvesting over a 3-year period. ‘Davis', ‘Lee’, and ‘Bragg’ varieties produced significantly higher yields than did ‘Semmes', ‘Jackson’, or ‘Hardee’ when grown in weed-free plots, but ‘Bragg’ produced significantly higher yields than all other varieties when grown with johnsongrass. Less regrowth of johnsongrass occurred in plots of ‘Bragg’, ‘Davis', and ‘Semmes' than in plots of ‘Lee’, ‘Jackson’, and ‘Hardee’. Common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) reduced the average yields of six soybean varieties 63 to 75% when plots were hand-harvested. ‘Semmes' showed the lowest percentage yield reduction from common cocklebur competition when hand-harvested, and ‘Semmes' and ‘Bragg’ showed 53% to 57% reduction respectively when machine harvested.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 56 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Green, D. E., Cavanah, L. E., and Pinnell, E. L. 1966. Effect of seed moisture content, field weathering, and combine cylinder speed on soybean seed quality. Crop Sci. 6:7–10.Google Scholar
2. Hicks, D. R., Pendleton, J. W., Bernard, R. L., and Johnston, T. J. 1969. Response of soybean plant types to planting patterns. Agron. J. 61:290–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Holm, L. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci. 17:113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1965. Effectiveness of preplanting tillage in relation to herbicides in controlling johnsongrass for soybean production. Agron. J. 57:385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.Google Scholar
6. Park, J. K. and Webb, B. K. 1959. Soybean harvesting losses in South Carolina. South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 123: 8 p.Google Scholar
7. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil mosture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.Google Scholar
8. Staniforth, D. W. 1962. Responses of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effect of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.Google Scholar
10. U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1965. Losses in agriculture. Agr. Handb. No. 291. 120 p.Google Scholar
11. Vengris, J., Drake, M., Colby, W. G., and Bart, J. 1953. Chemical composition of weeds and accompanying crop plants. Agron. J. 45:213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Weber, C. R. and Fehr, W. R. 1966. Seed yield losses from lodging and combine harvesting in soybeans. Agron. J. 58:287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.Google Scholar