Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T16:48:16.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arsenic Levels in Crops Irrigated with Water Containing MSMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. W. J. Anderson ,
J. C. Pringle  and
R. W. Raines
L. W. J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Aquatic Weed Control Lab., P.O. Box 25007, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
J. C. Pringle
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Aquatic Weed Control Lab., P.O. Box 25007, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
R. W. Raines
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Aquatic Weed Control Lab., P.O. Box 25007, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mature plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Super Sioux’), cucumber (Cucumis sativas L. ‘Early pickling’), and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in small field plots, were exposed once to sprinkler or furrow irrigation water containing 0.11 kg/ha or 1.12 kg/ha MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate). Concentrations of MSMA in water were about 0.22 ppmw and 2.2 ppmw for the two rates, respectively. Samples of crops and soil were subsequently analyzed for elemental arsenic content by colorimetric and atomic absorption methods. Arsenic residues were higher, compared to controls, only in crops exposed to MSMA applied in sprinkler irrigation. Average arsenic levels were highest in tomatoes exposed to 2.2 ppmw MSMA by sprinkler irrigation, and after 30 and 45 days were 0.26 ppm and 0.35 ppm, respectively. Average arsenic levels in sprinkler-irrigated crops ranged from double to triple the arsenic levels in control (untreated) crops. Atomic absorption was more sensitive than the colorimetric method and could detect smaller differences in arsenic content of samples. The average arsenic residues in soil varied from 1 to 3 ppm, but the differences could not be attributed to treatment with MSMA.

Keywords

Ditchbankresidueaquaticherbicideweed
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , July 1978 , pp. 370 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aikens, M. B. and Lewis, R. J. 1976. Chemical distribution and gaseous evolution of arsenic-74 added to soils as DSMA-74 As. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 40:655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anderson, L. W. J., Dozier, H. L., Grosse, W. C., and Murray, W. S. 1974. EPA compendium of registered pesticides, Vol. 1. Herbicides and plant regulators. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
3. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Mode of action of herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 504 pp.Google Scholar
4. Bartley, T. R. 1970. Abstract of progress report on herbicide monitoring. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 23:65–66.Google Scholar
5. Bruns, V. F., Demint, R. J., Frank, P. A., Kelly, A. D., and Pringle, J. C. Jr. 1974. Responses and residues in six crops irrigated with water containing 2,4-D. College of Agric. Res. Center, Washington State Univ. Bull. 798. 9 pp.Google Scholar
6. Carey, A. E., Wiersma, G. B., Tai, H., and Mitchell, W. G. 1973. Organochlorine pesticide residues in soils and crops in the corn belt region, United States–1970. Pestic. Monit. J. 6:369–376.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Domir, S. C., Woolson, E. A., Kearney, P. C., and Isensee, A. R. 1976. Translocation and metabolic fate of monosodium methanearsonic acid in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:1214–1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Dowler, C. E. and Hauser, E. W. 1975. Weed control systems in cotton on Tifton loamy sand soil. Weed Sci. 23:40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Edwards, A. C. and Davis, D. E. 1975. Effects of an arsenical herbicide on a salt marsh ecosystem. J. Environ. Qual. 4:215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Finlayson, D. G. and MacCarthy, H. R. 1975. Pesticide residues in plants. Pages 57–86 in Edwards, C. A., ed. Environmental pollution by pesticides. Vol. 3 Environ. Res. Serv. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Hamilton, K. C. 1971. Repeated, foliar applications of MSMA on purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:675–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hiltibold, A. E., Hajek, B. F., and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Distribution of arsenic in soil profiles after repeated applications of MSMA. Weed Sci. 22:272–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kelly, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1970. Vitality of tubers of yellow nutsedge treated with arsenical herbicides. Weed Sci. 18:437–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Robinson, Edward L. 1975. Arsenic in soil with five annual applications of MSMA. Weed Sci. 23:341–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Salman, H. A., Bartley, T. R., and Summers, A. D. 1972. Progress report of residue studies on organic arsenicals used for ditchbank weed control. U.S. Dep. Interior, Bur. of Reclam., Rep. RECERC-72-37, 8 pp.Google Scholar
16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. Initial scientific review of MSMA/DSMA. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency. EPA 540/1-75-020. 115 pp.Google Scholar
17. Von Rumker, R., Lawless, E. W., and Meiners, A. F. 1974. Production, distribution, use and environmental impact potential of selected pesticides. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency. EPA 540/1-74-001. 439 pp.Google Scholar
18. Wauchope, R. D. 1975. Fixation of arsenical herbicides, phosphates, and arsenate in alluvial soils. J. Environ. Qual. 4:355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Weed Science Society of America. 1974. Herbicide handbook. 3rd Ed. pp. 225–228.Google Scholar
20. Wiersma, G. B., Tai, G., and Sand, P. F. 1972. Pesticide residue levels in soils, FY 1969–National Soils Monitoring Program. Pestic. Monit. J. 6:194–228.Google ScholarPubMed
21. Woolson, E. A. 1977. Fate of arsenicals in different environmental substrates. Environ. Health Perspectives (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar