Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:32:10.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allelopathy of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. A. Steenhagen  and
R. L. Zimdahl
D. A. Steenhagen
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
R. L. Zimdahl
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The allelopathic potential of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) was investigated in the field and greenhouse. Reductions in frequency and density of quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.] and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) were noted where leafy spurge had high densities in the field. Field soil samples taken from areas of moderate and high leafy spurge densities inhibited tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in the greenhouse. Growth of seedlings was inhibited up to 60% when leafy spurge leaves, roots, or litter were incorporated into soil, but surface applied leafy spurge litter had no effect. Growth inhibition was demonstrated for crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.] and tomato when 0.1 to 1.0% (w/w) of leafy spurge leaves or roots were added to soil. Based on these studies we postulate that leafy spurge exhibits allelopathic characteristics which may result from the incorporation of dead or decaying plant material in soil.

Keywords

Plant littertomatocrabgrass
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bonner, James. 1950. The role of toxic substances in the interaction of higher plants. Bot. Rev. 16:51–65.Google Scholar
2. Heikes, E. 1975. Leafy spurge. Colorado State University Extension Bull. (Unnumbered). 2 pp.Google Scholar
3. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. Rev. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn., Circ. 347, Col. Agric., Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
4. Le Tourneau, D. 1951. The phytotoxic effects of aqueous extracts of leafy spurge. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf., p. 181.Google Scholar
5. Le Tourneau, D., Failes, G. D., and Heggeness, M. G. 1956. The effect of aqueous extracts of plant tissue on germination of seeds and growth of seedlings. Weeds 4:363–368.Google Scholar
6. Le Tourneau, D. and Heggeness, M. G. 1957. Germination and growth inhibitors in leafy spurge foliage and quackgrass rhizomes. Weeds 5:12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Muller, C. H. 1966. The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 93:322–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rice, E. L. 1965. Inhibition of nitrogen-fixing and nitrifying bacteria by seed plants. II. Characterization and identification of inhibitors. Physiol. Plant. 18:255–268.Google Scholar
9. Rice, E. L. 1969. Inhibition of nitrogen-fixing and nitrifying bacteria by seed plants. III. Inhibitors from Euphorbia supina . Physiol. Plant. 22:1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York, 353 p.Google Scholar
11. Selleck, G. W. 1972. The antibiotic effect of plants in laboratory and field. Weed Sci. 20:189–194.Google Scholar
12. Selleck, G. W., Coupland, R. T., and Frankton, C. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monogr. 32:1–29.Google Scholar
13. Whittaker, R. M. and Feeny, P. P. 1971. Allelochemics:chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770.Google Scholar