Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:29:00.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption and Mobility of Metribuzin in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. E. Savage
K. E. Savage*
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sorption equilibria and relative mobility of metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazin-5(4H)-one] were evaluated on 16 soils from the lower alluvial flood plain of the Mississippi River as a function of soil properties. Metribuzin sorption and mobility were significantly correlated with each other and both parameters were significantly associated with clay content, organic matter, and water content at 0, 0.33 field capacity (FC), and 15 bars tension. Prediction equations for adsorption (K1 = −1.10 + 0.08 FC) and mobility (Rf = 0.81 − 0.015 FC) indices were developed based on water content at 0.33 bar tension (FC). A competitive effect was observed between the combination of various levels of clay and organic matter as related to metribuzin adsorption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , September 1976 , pp. 525 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hance, R.J. 1965. The adsorption of urea and some of its derivatives by a variety of soils. Weed Res. 5:98–107.Google Scholar
2. Hance, R.J. 1967. Relationship between partition data and the adsorption of some herbicides by soils. Nature 214:630–631.Google Scholar
3. Harris, C.I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:214–216.Google Scholar
4. Harris, C.I. and Warren, G.F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Helling, C.S. 1971. Pesticide mobility in soils. III. Influence of soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35:743–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Helling, C.S. and Turner, B.C. 1968. Pesticide mobility: Determination by soil thin-layer chromatography. Science 162:562–563.Google Scholar
7. Lambert, S.M. 1967. Functional relationship between sorption in soil and chemical structure. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:572–576.Google Scholar
8. Lambert, S.M., Porter, P.E., and Schieferstein, R.H. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to soil. Weeds 13:185–190.Google Scholar
9. Savage, K.E. and Wauchope, R.D. 1974. Fluometuron adsorption-desorption equilibria in soil. Weed Sci. 22:106–110.Google Scholar
10. Upchurch, R.P., Selman, F.L., Mason, D.D., and Kamprath, E.J. 1966. The correlation of herbicidal activity with soil and climatic factors. Weeds 14:42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Weber, J.B., Weed, S.B., and Ward, T.M. 1969. Adsorption of s-triazines by soil organic matter. Weed Sci. 17:417–421.Google Scholar