Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-scc96 Total loading time: 0.318 Render date: 2021-06-20T20:27:33.426Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Article contents

Revisiting the Perspective and Progress of Integrated Weed Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Debanjan Sanyal
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, Monmouth Agronomy Center, Monmouth, IL 61462
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003
Randy L. Anderson
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD 57006
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Statewide IPM Program, Kearney Agricultural Center, University of California, Parlier, CA 93648
Corresponding

Abstract

The concept of integrated pest management (IPM) was first introduced in the 1960s. Since then many definitions of IPM have appeared in the literature. According to the 1988 U.S. National IPM Coordinating Committee, the primary goals of IPM programs are to reduce pesticide use and the subsequent environmental impact and to rely more on alternative strategies to control pests. Integrated weed management (IWM) comes under the umbrella of IPM with similar objectives of using multiple management tactics and incorporating the knowledge of weed biology and crop physiology into the weed management system. The goals of IWM range from maximizing profit margins to safeguarding natural resources and minimizing the negative impact of weed control practices on the environment. The acceptance of IWM by farmers will depend on their perceived risk to management, individual management capability, and environmental interactions that will influence the economic viability of the cropping system. We have been in this process of developing, integrating, and adopting potential IWM practices for the last 25 to 30 yr. However, strategic directions for research in the future must continue to discover opportunities for enhanced profitability and sustainability.

Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Anderson, R. L. 2005. A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agron. J. 97:15791583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andow, D. A. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 36:561586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, K. L. 1996. Diseases under conservation tillage systems. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:635639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, W. I. and Kogan, M. 1996. Compendium of IPM definitions. Oregon State University, Integrated Plant Protection Center, Corvallis, OR. Web site http://www.ippc.orst.edu/ipmdefinitions/.Google Scholar
Benbrook, C. M., Groth, E., Halloran, J. M., Hansen, M. K., and Marquardt, S. 1996. Pest Management at the Crossroads. Yonkers, NY Consumers Union. 272.Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R. L., Snchez, R. A., Forcella, F., Kruk, B. C., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res. 67:105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1997. Weed biology: importance to weed management. Weed Sci. 45:349356.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Inderjit, . 2003. Challenges and opportunities in implementing allelopathy for natural weed management. Crop Prot. 22:661671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Reddy, K. N. 1988a. Effects of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) on growth, yield, and nutrient status of transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 36:775778.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Reddy, K. N. 1988b. Interference of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technol. 2:505508.Google Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. 1960. Studies on plant competition. in Harper, J.L., ed. The Biology of Weeds. Oxford, UK Blackwell Science. 133142.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:507513.Google Scholar
Boutwell, J. L. and Smith, R. H. 1981. A new concept in evaluating integrated pest management programs. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 27 (2):117118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1999. Expanding the context of weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 2003. Weed biology, cropping systems, and weed management. J. Crop Prod. 8:245270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Gunsolus, J. L. 1996. Effect of date of preplant tillage and planting on weed populations and mechanical weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:373379.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., and Forcella, F. 1997. Implications of weed seed bank dynamics to weed management. Weed Sci. 45:329336.Google Scholar
Burn, A. J., Coaker, T. H., and Jepson, P. C. 1987. Integrated Pest Management. San Diego. CA: Academic.Google Scholar
Callaway, M. B. 1992. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 7:169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, D. G., Rajotte, E. G., and Harp, A. 1992. A survey of integrated pest management (IPM) adoption in Pennsylvania (contract number 449011). Final report to Pennsylvania Dept. of Agriculture. Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Entomology, University Park.Google Scholar
Capinera, J. L. 2005. Relationships between insect pests and weeds: an evolutionary perspective. Weed Sci. 53:892901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisaka, H. 1977. Weed damage to crops: yield loss due to weed competition. in Fryer, J.D. and Matsunaka, S., eds. Integrated Control of Weeds. Tokyo University of Tokyo Press. 116.Google Scholar
Coble, H. D. and Mortensen, D. A. 1992. The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technol. 6:191195.Google Scholar
Coli, W. M. and Hollingsworth, C. S. 1996. Defining the ambiguous. The Grower (April) 4858.Google Scholar
Conley, S. P., Binning, L. K., Boerboom, C. M., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 2003. Parameters for predicting giant foxtail cohort effect on soybean yield loss. Agron. J. 95:12261232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, B. J. 1987. Theory and realty of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q. 2:1320.Google Scholar
Cowbrough, M. J., Brown, R. B., and Tardif, F. J. 2003. Impact of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) aggregation on economic thresholds in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:947954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapar, G. F., Curry, M. P., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Grower acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois. Weed Technol. 11:828831.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409417.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through manipulations of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491497.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1986. Naturally occurring chemical compounds as herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:1544.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. 1986. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:6789.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1990. Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbance. Weed Sci. 38:504510.Google Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Lindquist, J. L., Shapiro, C. A., and Blankenship, E. E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, H. 1978. Nematode economic thresholds: derivations, requirements, and theoretical considerations. J. Nematol. 10:341350.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., King, R. P., Swinton, S. M., Buhler, D. D., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1996. Multiyear validation of a decision aid for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 44:650661.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D. H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, K. A. and Dixon, P. M. 1998. When does the spatial pattern of weeds matter? Predictions from neighborhood models. Ecol. Appl. 8:12501259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, K. S., Arshad, M. A., and Moyer, J. R. 1997. Cultural control of weeds. in Pimental, D., ed. Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use. New York J. Wiley. 237275.Google Scholar
Gillmeister, W. L., Moffitt, L. J., Bhowmik, P. C., and Geoffrey, P. 1989. Profitability of Cabbage Weed Control Alternatives. University of Massachusetts Bull. no. C-199, 10 p.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. 1978. The Least in Best Pesticide Strategy. Emmaus. PA: JG Press. 205p.Google Scholar
Halford, C., Hamill, A. S., Zhang, J., and Doucet, C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:737744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441447.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., and Clayton, G. W. 2001. Timing weed removal in field pea (Pisum sativum). Weed Technol. 15:277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., and Schmoll, J. T. 2003. Postdispersal predation of giant ragweed seed in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 51:955964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, S. J. and Forcella, F. 1993. Vernal seedling emergence model for common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci. 41:309316.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2007. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Online at: http://www.weedscience.org.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, C. S. and Coli, W. M. 2001. IPM adoption in northeastern U.S.: an examination of the IPM continuum. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 6:177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, C. S., Coli, W. M., and Hazzard, R. V. 1996. Massachusetts IPM guide-lines. Commodity specific definitions. Ext. Bull. SP-136. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. and Medd, R. 2000. Economic thresholds and the case for longer term approaches to population management of weeds. Weed Technol. 14:337350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. and Beckie, H. J. 1998. Contribution on nitrogen fertilizer placement to weed management in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 12:507514.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds. 10:2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50:773786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003. Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:666673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:568573.Google Scholar
Leighty, C. E. 1938. Crop rotation. in. U.S. Department of Agriculture Yearbook of Agriculture: Soils and Men. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office. 406430.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. J., van Lenteren, J. G., Phatak, S. C., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1997. A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 94:1224312248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl. 3:92122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. R. 1997. Many little hammers: Ecological management of crop–weed interactions. in Jackson, L., ed. Ecology in Agriculture. New York Academic. 291341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P. 2001. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybecker, D. W., Schweizer, D. W., and King, R. P. 1991. Weed management decisions in corn based on bioeconomic modeling. Weed Sci. 39:124129.Google Scholar
Martin, S. G., Van Acker, R. C., and Friesen, L. F. 2001. Critical period for weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49:326333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D. G. and Glynn, C. J. 1994. Difficulties in measuring adoption of apple IPM. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 48:219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1975. Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci. 23:386390.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 1993. A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecol Appl. 3:5373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohler, C. L. and Callaway, M. B. 1995. Effects of tillage and mulch on weed seed production and seed banks in sweet corn. J. Appl. Ecol. 32:627639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, D. A., Bastiaans, L., and Sattin, M. 2000. The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook. Weed Res. 40:4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Roman, E. S., Lindwall, C. W., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Weed management in conservation tillage systems for wheat production in North and South America. Crop Prot. 13:243259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munier-Jolain, N. M., Chauvel, B., and Gasquez, J. 2002. Long-term modeling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. Weed Res. 42:107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences 1969. Principles of Plant and Animal Pest Control. Washington, DC National Academy Press 508.Google ScholarPubMed
Nieto, J. H., Brondo, M. A., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS. 14:159166.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. 1999. Ecological implications of using thresholds for weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2:3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. and Kogan, M. 2000. Interaction between weeds, arthropod pests, and their natural enemies in managed ecosystems. Weed Sci. 48:94158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Blackshaw, R. E., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., and Maurice, D. C. 2005. Field evaluation of regression equations to estimate crop yield losses due to weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 85:955962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. R. 1988. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol. 2:398403.Google Scholar
Overton, J. 1996. Ecologically Based Pest Management—New Solutions for a New Century. Washington, DC Natl. Acad. Press. 144.Google Scholar
Pedigo, L. P. 1995. Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice. J. Agric. Entomol. 12:171181.Google Scholar
Pedigo, L. P., Hutchins, S. H., and Higley, L. G. 1986. Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 31:341368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pester, T. A., Burnside, O. C., and Orf, J. H. 1999. Increasing crop competitiveness to weeds through crop breeding. J. Crop. Prod. 2:3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, F. and Cussans, G. W. 1981. The influence of tillage on the weed flora in a succession of winter cereal crops on a sandy loam soil. Weed Res. 21:185190.Google Scholar
Ponce, R. G. and Santin, I. 2004. Effects of early weed infestation on growth, yield, and nitrogen nutrition of pepper. J. Plant Nutr. 27:651661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajotte, E. G., Kazmierczak, R. F., Norton, G. W., Lambur, M. T., and Allen, W. A. 1987. The National Evaluation of Extension's Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Programs. Appendix 3: Massachusetts Apple IPM Impact Study. Virg. Coop. Ext. Serv. Pub. 491-014. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6:155.Google Scholar
Roman, E. R., Thomas, A. G., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Modeling germination and seedling elongation of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L). Weed Sci. 47:149155.Google Scholar
Sarrantonio, M. and Gallandt, E. 2003. The role of cover crops in North American cropping systems. J. Crop Prod. 8:5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. C., Singh, H. B., and Friesen, G. H. 1977. Competition from weeds and their control in direct seeded rice. Weed Res. 17:103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, W. C. 1982. Integrated Weed Management Systems Technology for Pest Management. Weed Sci. 30:212.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A., Clements, D. R., and Upadhyaya, M. K. 2004. Weed management in agroecosystems: towards a holistic approach. in Pandalai, S., ed. Recent Research Developments in Crop Science, Vol. 1, Part II. Trivandrum, India Research Signpost. 451477.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A. and Fidelibus, M. W. 2005. Grape vine row orientation affects light environment, growth, and development of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 53:802812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A., Knezevic, S. Z., Roy, R. C., Ball-Coelho, B., and Swanton, C. J. 2002. Effect of tillage, cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil. Weed Res. 42:7687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A., Rajcan, I., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 2001. An integrated weed management strategy for glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:517522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. F. and van den Bosch, R. 1967. Integrated control. in Kilgore, W. and Doutt, R., eds. Pest Control: Biological, Physical, and Selected Chemical Methods. New York Academic. 295–340.Google Scholar
Stern, V. M., Smith, R. F., van den Bosch, R., and Hagen, K. S. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia. 29:81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, K. F., Lanini, W. T., Mitchell, J. P., Miyao, E., and Shrestha, A. 2006. Control, yield, and quality of processing tomato production under different irrigation, tillage, and herbicide systems. Weed Technol. 20:831838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Chandler, K., and Shrestha, A. 1999a. Weed seed return as influenced by the critical weed-free period in corn (Zea mays L). Can. J. Plant Sci. 79:165167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Weaver, S., Cowan, P., Van Acker, R., Deen, W., and Shrestha, A. 1999b. Weed thresholds: theory and applicability. J. Crop Prod. 2:929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657663.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1996. Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:475479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepe, I., Erman, M., Yazlik, A., Levent, R., and Ipek, K. 2005. Comparison of some winter lentil cultivars in weed–crop competition. Crop Prot. 24:585589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tette, J. P., Kovach, J., Schwarz, M., and Brunno, D. 1987. IPM in New York apple orchards—development, demonstration, and adoption. New York's Food Life Sci. Bull. 119. Ithaca, NY Cornell University.Google Scholar
Timmons, F. L. 2005. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 53:748761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollenaar, M., Dibo, A. A., Aguilera, A., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agron. J. 86:591595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. National IPM Coordinating Committee 1988. Integrated pest management: a national plan for future direction. Pages 12.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr). Weed Sci. 41:194200.Google Scholar
Vandeman, A., Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., and Lin, B. H. 1994. Adoption of integrated pest management in U. S. agriculture. ERS Bull. 707. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Vitta, J. I. and Satorre, E. H. 1999. Validation of a weed : crop competition model. Weed Res. 39:259269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Smika, D. E. 1990. Central Great Plains. in Donald, W.W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 127157.Google Scholar
Wijnands, F. G. 1992. Evaluation and introduction of integrated arable farming in practice. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 40:239249.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J. 2004. Economics of weed management: principles and practices. Weed Technol. 18:14031407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, G. G., Wiles, L. J., and Bennett, A. C. 2002. Weed management decision models: pitfalls, perceptions, and possibilities of the economic threshold approach. Weed Sci. 50:411424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. 2006. Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn. Weed Sci. 54:928933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, D. L. 1992. Future of weed science research. Weed Technol. 6:162165.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C. 1985. On the conceptual basis of crop loss assessment: the threshold theory. Rev. Phytopathol. 23:455473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1988. The concept and application of the critical weed-free period. in Altieri, M.A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL CRC. 145155.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 2004. in. Weed–Crop Competition: A Review. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing. 109129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Revisiting the Perspective and Progress of Integrated Weed Management
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Revisiting the Perspective and Progress of Integrated Weed Management
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Revisiting the Perspective and Progress of Integrated Weed Management
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *