Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:23:43.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Placement Techniques for Preemergence Applications of Pendimethalin in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven M. Brown
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
John E. Morrison Jr.
Affiliation:
Ag. Eng., USDAARS, P.O. Box 6112, Temple, TX 75603
David C. Bridges
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate placement techniques for preemergence applications of pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.]. The first technique consisted of row shields mounted behind the planter units. Shields maintained an untreated strip over the crop drill and allowed successful crop establishment with pendimethalin at 1.1 kg ai/ha, despite a simulated, intense rainfall of 3.8 cm within 24 h after planting. A second technique, which consisted of a special nozzle arrangement, was evaluated in no-till grain sorghum. The nozzle arrangement allowed a broadcast herbicide application but maintained an untreated strip over the crop drill. No stand reductions occurred using this technique at pendimethalin rates of 1.1 and 2.2 kg/ha. In a growth chamber experiment, preemergence applications of pendimethalin severely injured grain sorghum when the soil was wet at the time of emergence, but injury was reduced under hot, dry conditions.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1965. Detoxification of simazine- and atrazinetreated soil with activated carbon. Proc. Northeast. Weed Conf. 19:365366.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1982. Weed control in corn planted into untilled weed stubble. Agron. J. 94:521526.Google Scholar
3. Chandler, J. M., Wooten, O. B., and Fulgham, E. F. 1978. Influence of placement of charcoal on protection of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) from diuron. Weed Sci. 26:239244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Craig, J. and Frederiksen, R. A. 1985. Effect of seed safeners on incidence of sorghum downy mildew. Proc. Grain Sorghum Res. and Util. Conf. 14:137.Google Scholar
5. Hollingsworth, D. and Abernathy, J. R. 1977. Efficacy and phytotoxicity of post-incorporated applications of dinitroaniline herbicides in corn and sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:119.Google Scholar
6. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of dinitroaniline-type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ketchersid, M. L., Norton, K., and Merkle, M. G. 1981. Influence of soil moisture on the safening effect of CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 29:281287.Google Scholar
8. Mcintosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.Google Scholar
9. Moomaw, R. S., Martin, A. R., and Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1983. Layby herbicide application for season-long weed control in irrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 31:137140.Google Scholar
10. Norton, K. R. and Merkle, M. G. 1977. Using dinitroaniline herbicides in grain sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:422.Google Scholar
11. Sullivan, K. L. and Merkle, M. G. 1980. Differential response of various sorghum varieties to preemergence application of pendimethalin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:46.Google Scholar