Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T13:52:54.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Foliarly Applied Herbicides on Three Weed Species in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. David Moore  and
Philip A. Banks
J. David Moore
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the greenhouse, naptalam at 1.1 to 4.5 kg ai ha−1 antagonized activity of paraquat at 0.04 to 0.14 kg ai ha−1 in 14 of 16 rate combinations when applied to sicklepod. Sicklepod shoot fresh weight reduction was less compared to that obtained with paraquat alone when paraquat at 0.04 kg ha−1 was mixed with bentazon at 0.42 to 0.84 kg ai ha−1 or monocarbamide dihydrogensulfate at 14 to 58 kg ai ha−1. Paraquat activity on Florida beggarweed was antagonized by mixtures of paraquat at 0.04 or 0.07 kg ha−1 with bentazon at 0.63 or 0.84 kg ha−1 or paraquat at 0.04 to 0.14 kg ha−1 with naptalam at 3.4 or 4.5 kg ha−1. Mixtures of lactofen at 0.06 to 0.22 kg ai ha−1 with monocarbamide dihydrogensulfate at 14 kg ha−1 or lactofen at 0.06 or 0.16 kg ha−1 with alachlor at 1.4 to 2.8 kg ai ha−1 synergistically increased tall morningglory shoot fresh weight reduction. In the field, excellent sicklepod shoot fresh weight reduction by paraquat applied alone masked most antagonistic effects of paraquat mixtures. Addition of alachlor to monocarbamide dihydrogensulfate at 29 kg ha−1 improved activity on sicklepod compared to monocarbamide dihydrogensulfate applied alone.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2–chloro–N–(2,6–diethylphenyl)–N–(methoxymethyl)acetamidebentazon, 3–(1–methylethyl)–(1H)–2,1,3–benzothiadiazin–4(3H)–one 2,2–dioxidelactofen, (±)–2–ethoxy–1–methyl–2–oxoethyl 5–[2–chloro–4–(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]–2–nitrobenzoatemonocarbamide dihydrogensulfatenaptalam, 2–[(1–naphthalenylamino)carbonyl]benzoic acidparaquat, 1,1′–dimethyl–4,4′–bipyridinium ionFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC # DEDTOsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth. # PHBPUpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner′Alachlorbentazonlactofenmonocarbamide dihydrogensulfatenaptalamparaquatCASOBDEDTOPHBPU
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 614 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Atwater, M. L. and Rush, D. W. 1989. The effect of application timing of Enquik herbicide on peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:32.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. 1987. Weed control research in peanuts. Pages 25–27 in Georgia Peanut Res.–Extension Rep. Univ. Georgia College of Agric Misc. Publ. Google Scholar
3. Banks, P. A. 1989. Herbicide replacements for dinoseb in peanuts. Georgia Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. 566. Pages 1–8.Google Scholar
4. Böger, P. 1989. New plant-specific targets for future herbicides. Pages 247–282 in Böger, P. and Sandmann, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL 33431.Google Scholar
5. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds. 15:20–22.Google Scholar
6. Colvin, D. L. and Yonce, H. D. 1989. Basagran-Gramoxone admix combinations for peanut weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:23.Google Scholar
7. Evans, J. R., Turner, J. C., Gourd, D. R., and McKemie, T. E. 1988. Interaction of bentazon and paraquat for peanut weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:68.Google Scholar
8. Flint, J. L., Cornelius, P. L., and Barrett, M. 1988. Analyzing herbicide interactions: A statistical treatment of Colby's method. Weed Technol. 2:304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Pages 316–332 in Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
10. Green, J. M. and Bailey, S. P. Herbicide interactions with herbicides and other agricultural chemicals. Pages 37–61 in McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Monogr. No. 4. Champaign, IL 61820.Google Scholar
11. Hagwood, H. B., Nichols, R. L., Bates, M. R., and Trammell, C. A. 1988. Label summary for use of lactofen in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:70.Google Scholar
12. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
13. Hicks, T. V., Cole, T. A., and Wehtje, G. R. 1988. Weed control in peanuts with paraquat and paraquat tank mixtures. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:66.Google Scholar
14. Hogue, E. J. and Warren, G. F., 1970. Comparisons of dihydroxybenzenes and paraquat. Weed Sci. 18:179–182,Google Scholar
15. Mine, A. and Matsunaka, S. 1975. Mode of action of bentazon: Effect on photosynthesis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 5:444–450.Google Scholar
16. Moore, J. D. and Banks, P. A. 1989. Comparisons of early postemergence weed control systems for peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:29.Google Scholar
17. Nichols, R. L., Bates, M. R., Hagwood, H. B., and Trammell, C. A. 1988. Lactofen, an alternative to dinoseb in cotton and peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:329.Google Scholar
18. Pesticide products containing dinoseb; notices. 1986. Federal Register. 51:36634–36661.Google Scholar
19. Wehtje, G. R. and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Performance of various herbicide combinations with paraquat for weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:22.Google Scholar
20. Wehtje, G. R., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308–311.Google Scholar
21. Wilcut, J. W. and Swann, C. W. 1989. Evaluation of lactofen for weed control in Virginia peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:27.Google Scholar
22. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Yonce, H., Lunsford, J., Rogers, B., Greeson, V., Burnett, R., and McClary, T. 1989. Weed control with Gramoxone Super and tank mixes in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:23.Google Scholar