Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:58:57.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elaiosomes on Weed Seeds and the Potential for Myrmecochory in Naturalized Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert W. Pemberton  and
Delilah W. Irving
Robert W. Pemberton
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., West. Reg. Res. Ctr., Albany, CA 94710
Delilah W. Irving
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., West. Reg. Res. Ctr., Albany, CA 94710
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of plants naturalized in the United States were examined for the presence of elaiosomes. Seeds of 47 species belonging to 13 families (Asteraceae, Boraginaceae, Dipsacaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Fumariaceae, Lamiaceae, Liliaceae, Poaceae, Polygonaceae, Resedaceae, Rosaceae, and Solanaceae) were found to have elaiosomes, indicating that these species are probably mymecochorous, i.e., dispersed by ants. These include important rangeland weeds such as bull thistle, Canada thistle, musk thistle, diffuse knapweed, spotted knapweed, and leafy spurge. Myrmecochory in naturalized species may enhance their weediness in areas where they are established and assist their colonization of new and relatively closed communities.

Keywords

Antsseed dispersalrangelandCRUACCRUPYCRUTECENCYCENMECENNICXDBETLNMOSAOSCEPHCYEPHHEEPHPEFUMOFGENTIKNAARLAMAMLAMMALAMPUPTLANPTLRCRESLURIICOSLYMASYMOFELYCMULEEU
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1990 , pp. 615 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beattie, A. J. 1983. Distribution of ant-dispersed plants. Pages 249–267 in Kubitzki, K., ed. Dispersal and Distribution. Parey, Hamburg, W. Germany.Google Scholar
2. Beattie, A. J. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K. 182 pages.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beattie, A. J. and Culver, D. C. 1983. The nest chemistry of two seed-dispersing ant species. Oecologia 56:99–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Berg, R. Y. 1975. Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Aust. J. Bot. 23:475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bond, W. J. and Slingsby, P. 1983. Seed dispersal by ants in shrublands of the Cape Province and its evolutionary implications. S. Afr. J. Sci. 79:231–233.Google Scholar
6. Bond, W. J. and Slingsby, P. 1984. Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Protaceae. Ecology 65:1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bresinsky, A. 1963. Bau, entwicklungsgeschichte und inhalsstoffe der elaiosomen. Bibl. Bot. 126:1–54.Google Scholar
8. Fahn, A. 1982. Plant Anatomy. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K. Pages 470–471, 479.Google Scholar
9. Handel, S. N. 1978. The competitive relationship of three woodland sedges, and its bearing on the evolution of ant dispersal of Carex pedunculata Evolution 32:151–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Heithaus, E. R. 1981. Seed predation by rodents on three ant-dispersed plants. Ecology 62:136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Leininger, W. C. 1988. Non-chemical alternatives for managing selected plant species in the western United States, Colorado State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Ft. Collins. 48 pages.Google Scholar
12. Munz, P. A. 1968. A supplement to a California flora. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. Page 73.Google Scholar
13. Munz, P. A. and Keck, D. D. 1959. A California flora. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. Page 774.Google Scholar
14. Ohara, M. and Higashi, S. 1987. Interference by ground beetles with the dispersal by ants of seeds of Trillium species (Liliaceae). J. Ecol. 75:1091–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Pemberton, R. W. 1988. Myrmecochory in the introduced range weed, leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) Am. Midl. Nat. 119:431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ridley, H. N. 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. L. Reeve Co., Ltd., Asford, Kent, U.K. Pages 518–527.Google Scholar
17. Robbins, W. W., Bellue, M. K., and Ball, W. S. 1970. Weeds of California. State of Calif., Sacramento. Pages 510–511, 515.Google Scholar
18. Semander, R. 1906. Entwurf einer monographie der Europaischen myrmekochoren. K. Sven. Vetenskapsaka d. Handl. 41:1–409.Google Scholar
19. United States Dept. Agric. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Soil Conserv. Serv. Tech. Publ. 159. Vol. 1. 854 pages.Google Scholar
20. Zimdahl, R. L. 1983. Weeds of Colorado. Colorado State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Ft. Collins. Page 7.Google Scholar