Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:59:17.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparisons of Dicamba, Picloram, and 2,4-D for Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

F. W. Roeth
F. W. Roeth*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. University of Nebraska, South Central Station, Clay Center, NE 68933
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fall applications of 0.14 kg/ha of picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) to musk thistle (Carduus nutans L.) rosettes controlled musk thistle stems better and more consistently than fall applications of 2.2 kg/ha of 2,4-D amine [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], 0.6 kg/ha of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), or a mixture of 0.3 kg/ha dicamba + 1.1 kg/ha of 2,4-D. Dry conditions in 1975 and cool conditions in November, 1976, hampered control with all herbicides except picloram. In spring applications when growing conditions were favorable, herbicide differences were usually not significant. For all herbicides, treatment of bolted stems did not control musk thistle satisfactorily. Picloram was superior for reducing stems 12 to 18 months after application in 2 of 3 yr. Residual control resulted principally because the herbicide killed many seedlings and first-year rosettes at the time of application.

Keywords

Rangeland weed controlclimatic effectsherbicide combinationspopulation variations
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , November 1979 , pp. 651 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dunn, P. H. 1976. Distribution of Carduus nutans, C. acanthoides, C. pycnocephalus, and C. crispus, in the United States. Weed Sci. 24:518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Feldman, Israel, McCarty, M. K., and Scifres, C. J. 1968. Ecological and control studies of musk thistle. Weed Sci. 16:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. McCarty, M. K., Scrifes, C. J., Smith, A. L., and Horst, G. L. 1969. Germination and early seedling development of musk and plumeless thistle. Univ. of Nebraska Res. Bull. 299. 28 PP.Google Scholar
4. McCarty, M. K. and Scrifes, C. J. 1969. Life cycle studies with musk thistle. Univ. of Nebraska Res. Bull. 230. 15 pp.Google Scholar
5. McCarty, M. K. and Hatting, J. L. 1975. Effects of herbicides or mowing on musk thistle seed production. Weed Res. 15:363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar