Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T11:58:02.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Overview of New Techniques and Advances in Weed Physiology and Molecular Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 480 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Helentjaris, T. and Burr, B. 1989. Development and application of molecular markers to problems in plant genetics. Current communications in molecular biology, Cold Spring Harbor Lab., Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
2. Hou, Y. and Sterling, T. M. 1991. Characterization of snakeweed genetic variability using gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. Suppl. 96:562a.Google Scholar
3. Kephart, S. R. 1990. Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes; a comparative analysis of techniques. Am. J. Bot. 77:693–712.Google Scholar
4. King, R. P., Lybecker, D. W., Schweizer, E. E., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1986. Bioeconomic modeling to simulate weed control strategies for continuous corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:972–979.Google Scholar
5. Moss, S.R. 1990. Herbicide cross-resistance in slender foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides) . Weed Sci. 38:492–496.Google Scholar
6. Nissen, S. J., Masters, R. A., Lee, D. J., and Rowe, M. L. 1991. Comparison of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the chloroplast DNA of five leafy spurge (Euphorbia spp.) accessions. Weed Sci. 39:(In press).Google Scholar
7. Nissen, S. J., Masters, R. A., Lee, D. J., and Rowe, M. 1991. Evaluation of genetic diversity in Euphorbia esula using chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms. WSSA Abstr. 31:135.Google Scholar
8. Pohl, R. W. 1951. The genus Setaria in Iowa. Iowa St. J. Sci. 25:501–508.Google Scholar
9. Powles, S. B. and Howat, P. D. 1990. Herbicide-resistant weeds in Australia. Weed Technol. 4:178–185.Google Scholar
10. Slife, F. W. 1954. A New Setaria species in Illinois. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 11:6–7.Google Scholar
11. Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S., eds. 1989. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
12. Swinton, S. M. 1990. A bioeconomic model of weed management in Minnesota com and soybeans. PhD. Dissertation Proposal, Dep. Agric. and Appl. Econ., Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
13. Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J., eds. 1983. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
14. Wang, R. L. and Dekker, J. 1990. Use of molecular markers to differentiate inter- and intra-specific variants of the foxtail (Setaria spp.) complex. WSSA Abstr. 30:194.Google Scholar
15. Warwick, S. I. 1990. Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Syst. Evol. 169:41–54.Google Scholar
16. Warwick, S. I., Thompson, B. K., and Black, L. D. 1987. Life history and allozyme variation in populations of the weed species Setaria faberi . Can. J. Bot. 65:1396–1402.Google Scholar