Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:42:56.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Musical Text: Theorizing Openness after Structuralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2023

SAM RIDOUT Open the ORCID record for SAM RIDOUT [Opens in a new window]
SAM RIDOUT*
Affiliation:
Independent writer, London, UK
*
Email: samridout94@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article attends to the conjuncture in the early 1970s of post-Cagean musical practice and poststructuralist theory associated with the journal Musique en jeu and the music department of the Centre universitaire expérimental de Vincennes. Reading the theoretical writing of figures including Daniel Charles and Ivanka Stoïanova alongside the music of Costin Miereanu, the article elaborates the account of the open work that emerges there, before turning to an LP by Miereanu, Luna cinese (1975), which grapples with the aporetic figure of the open record and in so doing takes the ‘openness’ of post-Cagean experimentalism in new directions. In conclusion, I begin to theorize what Miereanu's open record suggests about the listening that records call for and the fixity of records in general.

Type
Article
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , First View , pp. 1 - 15
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlington, Robert. ‘Introduction: Avant-garde Music and the Sixties’, in Sound Commitments: Avant-Garde Music and the Sixties, ed. Adlington, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. ‘Opera and the Long-Playing Record’ [1969], trans. Thomas Y. Levin. October 55 (1990), 62–6.Google Scholar
Andreica, Oana. ‘Labyrinthes d'Adrien by Costin Miereanu or the Topology of Ruptures and Junctions’, in Sounds, Societies, Significations: Numanistic Approaches to Music, ed. Povilioniene, Rima. Cham: Springer, 2017. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, Roland. ‘From Work to Text’ [1971], in Image Music Text, ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen. London: Fontana, 1977. 155–64.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Le degré zéro de l’écriture. Paris: Seuil, 1953.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. ‘Le grain de la voix’. Musique en jeu 9 (1972), 57–63.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland ‘Listening’ [1977], in The Responsibility of Forms: Critical Essays on Music, Art, and Representation, trans. Richard Howard. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991. 245–60.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z, trans. Miller, Richard. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990 [1970].Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version’, in The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, ed. W, Michael. Jennings, Brigid Doherty, and Thomas Y. Levin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2008. 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borio, Gianmario. ‘Music as Plea for Political Action: The Presence of Musicians in Italian Protest Movements around 1968’, in Music and Protest in 1968, ed. Kutschke, Beate and Norton, Barley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Georgina. ‘On Musical Mediation: Ontology, Technology and Creativity’. Twentieth-Century Music 2/1 (2005), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories of Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘Dix Jeunes compositeurs’. Musique en jeu 1 (1970), 78–85.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘Entr'acte: “Formal” or “Informal” Music?’. The Musical Quarterly 51/1 (1965), 144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘L’écriture et le silence’. Musique en jeu 11 (1973), 99–108.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘L'esthétique du non finito chez John Cage’. Revue d'esthétique 21/2–4 (1968), 23–6.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘L'interprète et le hasard’. Musique en jeu 3 (1971), 45–51.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘La musique et l’écriture’. Musique en jeu 13 (1973), 3–13.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘La musique à Vincennes’. Musique en jeu 18 (1974), 63–92.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘Nature et silence chez John Cage’, in Le langage: Actes du XIIe Congrès des Sociétés de philosophie de langue française. Neufchâtel: La Baconnière, 1966. 172–4.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. ‘Ouverture et indétermination’. La Pensée 135 (1967), 182–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paul. ‘La Fac Soixante-Huitarde: The Centre Universitaire Expérimental de Vincennes and the Afterlife of a Revolutionary Moment’, in Global Revolutionary Aesthetics and Politics after Paris ’68, ed. Munro, Martin, Cloonan, William J., Faulk, Barry J., and Weber, Christian P.. London: Lexington, 2020. 79–102.Google Scholar
Cook, Nicholas. Beyond the Score: Music as Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
‘Daniel Charles: biographie’. http://home.att.ne.jp/grape/charles/dc/dc-bio.html (accessed 8 February 2023).Google Scholar
Diaconu, Ana. ‘Costin Miereanu's Contribution to Musique en jeu’. Musicology Today 12 (2021), 41–52.Google Scholar
Dosse, François. History of Structuralism. 2: The Sign Sets, 1967–Present, trans. Deborah Glassman. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. ‘L'oeuvre ouverte ou la poétique de l'indétermination’. Nouvelle revue française 91 (1960), 117–24.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. The Open Work, trans. Anna Cancogni. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989 [1962].Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Goldman, Jonathan. ‘Open Works on Record: An Unsung Mediation’, in Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, ed. Barthel-Calvet, Anne-Sylvie and Christopher, Brent Murray. Abingdon: Routledge, 2023. 152–71.Google Scholar
Goodman, David. ‘Distracted Listening: On Not Making Sound Choices in the 1930s’, in Sound in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, ed. Suisman, David and Strasser, Susan. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010. 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, David. Records Ruin the Landscape: John Cage, the Sixties, and Sound Recording. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Iddon, Martin. ‘The Haus That Karlheinz Built: Composition, Authority, and Control at the 1968 Darmstadt Ferienkurse’. The Musical Quarterly 87/1 (2004), 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iddon, Martin and Thomas, Philip. John Cage's Concert for Piano and Orchestra. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language, trans. Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984 [1974].Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. Sèméiotikè: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil, 1969.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. ‘Le sujet en procès’, in Artaud: Communications et interventions du Colloque de Cérisy, juin-juillet 1972, ed. Sollers, Philippe. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions, 1973. 43–108.Google Scholar
Levaux, Christophe. We Have Always Been Minimalist: The Construction and Triumph of a Musical Style, trans. Rose Vekony. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Metzger, Heinz-Klaus. ‘John Cage, or Liberated Music’ [1959], trans. Ian Pepper. October 82 (1997), 49–61.Google Scholar
Miereanu, Costin. ‘Décomposons Wagner’. Musique en jeu 22 (1976), 64–79.Google Scholar
Miereanu, Costin. Fuite et conquête du champ musical. Paris: Méridiens Klincksiek, 1995.Google Scholar
Miereanu, Costin. ‘Luna cinese: un récit de science-fiction musicale’. Musique en jeu 32 (1978), 51–9.Google Scholar
Miereanu, Costin. ‘“Textkomposition”: voie zéro de l’écriture musicale’. Musique en jeu 13 (1973), 49–73.Google Scholar
Mowitt, John. Text: The Genealogy of an Antidisciplinary Object. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
‘Notes on Contributors’. Contemporary Music Review 8/1 (1993), 213–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piencikowski, Robert. ‘“A score neither begins nor ends; at most it pretends to”: Fragmentary Reflections on the Boulezian “non finite”’, in Pierre Boulez Studies, ed. Campbell, Edward and O'Hagan, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekret, Paul. ‘“Melodies wander around as ghosts”: On Playlist as Cultural Form’. Critical Quarterly 61/2 (2019), 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, Jim. Music in the Balkans. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steingo, Gavin. ‘The Musical Work Reconsidered, in Hindsight’. Current Musicology 97 (2014), 81–112.Google Scholar
Stoïanova, Ivanka. ‘L’énoncé musical’. Musique en jeu 19 (1975), 23–57.Google Scholar
Stoïanova, Ivanka. Geste–Texte–Musique. Paris: Union général d’éditions, 1978.Google Scholar
Stoïanova, Ivanka. ‘Musique, graphie, geste’. Musique en jeu 13 (1973), 104–14.Google Scholar
Stoïanova, Ivanka. ‘Musique répétitive’. Musique en jeu 25 (1977), 64–74.Google Scholar
Stoïanova, Ivanka. ‘Pli selon pli: portrait de Mallarmé’. Musique en jeu 11 (1973), 75–98.Google Scholar
Strongin, Theodore. ‘When the Listener Is Composer’. New York Times, 16 June 1968, Arts section, 19.Google Scholar
Szendy, Peter. Listen: A History of Our Ears, trans. Charlotte Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Szendy, Peter. Of Stigmatology: Punctuation as Experience, trans. Jan Plug. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tone, Yasunao. ‘John Cage and Recording’. Leonardo Music Journal 13 (2003), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar