Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:35:36.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Pauper Marriage in Seventeenth-Century England (The Alexander Prize)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Steve Hindle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last thirty years the work of historical demographers, spearheaded by Sir Tony Wrigley, Roger Schofield and others at the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure, has demonstrated the centrality of marriage to explanations of early modern English demographic change: ‘a history of English population in this period in which nuptiality did not figure prominently would resemble the proverbial production of Hamlet without the prince of Denmark.’ Although their ‘neo-Malthusian’ or ‘neo-classical’ model of population levels kept in ‘dilatory homeostasis’ by negative feedback relationships between living standards, age at first marriage and the proportion of the population never marrying has not been immune from criticism, it is now generally accepted that changes in fertility rather than in mortality account for population stagnation in mid-seventeenth-century England, and for its renewed and rapid growth from the 1730s. Moreover, having flirted with, and subsequently discarded, changes in marital fertility as a proximate cause of fluctuations in the birth rate, Wrigley and Schofield are now convinced that nuptiality was decisive. For Wrigley, ‘the crucial importance of the tension between production and reproduction which affected all pre-industrial societies’ explains why marriage had a ‘significance…far wider than the purely demographic.’ ‘Marriage,’ he argues, ‘was the hinge on which the [early modern English] demographic system turned.’

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 8 , December 1998 , pp. 71 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield, The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (reprinted edn, Cambridge, 1989), 450–3; Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oeppen, J. E. and Schofield, R. S., English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 1580–1837 (Cambridge, 1997), 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 The relationship of Wrigley and Schofield's model to its ‘Malthusian’ and ‘classical’ predecessors is helpfully discussed by Landers, John, ‘From Colyton to Waterloo: Mortality, Politics and Economics in Historical Demography’, in Rethinking Social History: English Society 1570–1920 and Its Interpretation, ed. Wilson, Adrian (Manchester, 1993), 100Google Scholar. For ‘dilatory homeostasis’, see Wrigley, and Schofield, , Population History, 451Google Scholar.

3 Cf. Wrigley, E. A., ‘Family Limitation in Pre-industrial England’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xix (1966)Google Scholar, reprinted in Wrigley, People, Cities and Wealth: The Transformation of Traditional Society (Oxford, 1987), 242–69.

4 Wrigley, E. A., ‘The Growth of Population in Eighteenth-Century England: A Conundrum Resolved’, Past and Present, no. 98 (02 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted in Wrigley, People, Cities and Wealth, 239–40.

5 Weir, D. R., ‘Rather Never Than Late: Celibacy and Age at Marriage in English Cohort Fertility’, Journal of Family History, ix (1984), 349Google Scholar.

6 Wrigley, and Schofield, , Population History, xixGoogle Scholar; Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 195Google Scholar; For the Cambridge Group's detailed response to Weir, see Schofield, R.S., ‘English Marriage Patterns Revisited’, Journal of Family History, x (1985), 2–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 197Google Scholar.

8 For the Act of 1653 and its consequences see Nourse, G. B., ‘Law Reform Under the Commonwealth and Protectorate’, Law Quarterly Review, lxxv (1959), 512–29Google Scholar; and Durston, Christopher, The Family in the English Revolution (Oxford, 1989), 71–86Google Scholar. On underregistration of marriages c.1640–60, see Wrigley, and Schofield, , Population History, 23–8, especially table 1.4 and figure 1.2Google Scholar.

9 Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 125Google Scholar.

10 For criticisms of the ‘long lag’, see especially Flinn, M. W., ‘The Population History of England, 1541–1871’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xxxv (1982), 443–57Google Scholar; and (David Levine in) Gaunt, D., Levine, D. and Moodie, E., ‘The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Review Symposium’, Social History, viii (1983), 157Google Scholar. For the shift of interest toward celibacy, see Weir, ‘Rather Never Than Late’ and Goldstone, J. A., ‘The Demographic Revolution in England: A Re-examination’, Population Studies, xlix (1986), 5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Weir, , ‘Rather Never Than Late’, 342Google Scholar; Goldstone, , ‘Demographic Revolution’, 31Google Scholar.

12 The best discussion of the changing incidence of service is Kussmaul, Ann, Servants in Husbandry in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1981), 97–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Local studies of the relationship between marriage formation and the labour markets include Levine, David, Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Levine, David and Wrightson, Keith, The Making of an Industrial Society: Whickham, 1560–1765 (Oxford, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Sharpe, Pam, ‘Literally Spinsters: A New Interpretation of Local Economy and Demography in Colyton in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xliv (1991), 46–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For overviews, see Schurer, Kevin, ‘Variations in Household Structure in the Late Seventeenth Century: Towards a Regional Analysis’, in Surveying the People: The Interpretation and Use of Document Sources for the Study of Population in the Later Seventeenth Century, ed. Schurer, Kevin and Arkell, Tom (Oxford, 1992), 253–78Google Scholar; and Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 182–94Google Scholar.

13 Quoting Schofield, Roger, ‘Family Structure, Demographic Behaviour and Economic Growth’, in Famine, Disease and the Social Order in Early Modern Society, ed. Walter, John and Schofield, Roger (Cambridge, 1989), 285, 304Google Scholar. For other influential commentaries on the role of ideology in family formation, see Macfarlane, Alan, The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property and Social Transition (Cambridge, 1978)Google Scholar; Lesthaeghe, Ron, ‘On the Social Control of Human Reproduction’, Population and Development Review, vi (1980), 542–4Google Scholar; Smith, Richard M., ‘Fertility, Economy and Household Formation in England Over Three Centuries’, Population and Development Review, vii (1981), 618–9Google Scholar; and Smith, Richard M., ‘Some Issues Concerning Families and Their Property in Rural England 1250–1800’, in Land, Kinship and Life-Cycle, ed. Smith, Richard M. (Cambridge, 1984), 1–86Google Scholar.

14 Ingram, Martin, ‘The Reform of Popular Culture? Sex and Marriage in Early Modern England’, in Popular Culture in Seventeenth-Century England, ed. Reay, Barry (1985), 143Google Scholar.

15 Wrigley, and Schofield, , Population History, 298–305Google Scholar; Ingram, Martin, ‘Spousals Litigation in the English Ecclesiastical Courts, c.1350–1640’, in Marriage and Society: Studies in the Social History of Marriage, ed. Outhwaite, R. B. (1981), 47–57Google Scholar; and Houlbrooke, Ralph, The English Family 1450–1700 (1984), 85–8Google Scholar.

16 Legal developments with respect to marriage are usefully summarised in Outhwaite, R. B., Clandestine Marriage in England, 1500–1850 (1995), 1–17Google Scholar. For the late seventeenth-century flight from ecclesiastical solemnisation, see Brown, Roger Lee, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Fleet Marriages’, in Marriage and Society, ed. Outhwaite, , 117–36Google Scholar; Gillis, John, ‘Resort to Clandestine and Common Law Marriage in England and Wales, 1650–1850’, in Disputes and Settlements: Law and Human Relations in the West, ed. Bossy, John (Cambridge, 1983), 261–86Google Scholar; and Outhwaite, , Clandestine Marriage, 19–74Google Scholar.

17 On objections to marriage banns on grounds of precontract or ‘incest’, see Ingram, Martin, Church Courts, Sex and Marriage in England, 1570–1640 (Cambridge, 1987), 245–7Google Scholar; Adair, Richard, Courtship, Illegitimacy and Marriage in Early Modern England (Manchester, 1996), 162Google Scholar; and Cressy, David, Birth, Marriage and Death: Religion, Ritual and the Life-Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England (Oxford, 1997), 305–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Quoting Ingram, ‘The Reform of Popular Culture?’, 136Google Scholar.

19 But see, from a general theoretical perspective, Lesthaeghe, ‘Social Control of Human Reproduction’ and, more specifically, Smith, , ‘Fertility, Economy and Household Formation’, 602–11Google Scholar.

20 5 Elizabeth I, c.4. See Bindoff, S. T., ‘The Making of the Statute of Artificers’, in Elizabethan Government and Society, ed. Bindoff, S. T., Hurstfield, J. and Williams, C. H. (1961), 56–94Google Scholar. But see now Woodward, D. M., ‘The Background to the Statute of Artificers: the Genesis of Labour Policy, 1558–1563’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xxxiii (1980), 32–44Google Scholar; and Elton, G. R., The Parliament of England, 1559–1581 (Cambridge, 1986), 263–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 See Hindle, Steve, ‘Exclusion Crises: Poverty, Migration and Parochial Responsibility in English Rural Communities c.1560–1660’, Rural History, vii (1996), 125–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hindle, , ‘Power, Poor Relief and Social Relations in Holland Fen, c.1600–1800’, Historical Journal (forthcoming, 1998)Google Scholar.

22 Lincolnshire Archives Office, Frampton PAR 10/1 [vestry minute book, 1597–1683], unfol. (29 May 1642); 1/1 [parish register], unfol. (Jan. 1654). For the immediate context of these decisions, see Hindle, ‘Power, Poor Relief and Social Relations’.

23 Cressy, , Birth, Marriage and Death, 286–92Google Scholar, provides an elegant summary of the transformations involved in matrimony.

24 The only detailed discussion of indemnity bonds is Styles, Philip, ‘The Evolution of the Laws of Settlement’, University of Birmingham Historical Journal, ix (1963)Google Scholar, reprinted in Styles, Studies in Seventeenth-Century West Midlands History (Kineton, 1978), 180–3. But see now Hindle, ‘Exclusion Crises’.

25 Wrightson, Keith and Levine, David, Poverty and Piety in an English Village: Terling, 1525–1700 (2nd edn, Oxford, 1995), 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Ibid., 80.

27 Ingram, , Church Courts, 131Google Scholar.

28 Ingram, , ‘The Reform of Popular Culture?’, 145Google Scholar.

29 O'Hara, Diana, ‘“Ruled By My Friends”: Aspects of Marriage in the Diocese of Canterbury’, Continuity and Change, vi (1991), 28Google Scholar.

30 Early Essex Town Meetings: Braintree, 1619–1636; Finchingfield, 1626–34, ed. Emmison, F. G. (Chichester, 1970), 117Google Scholar; O'Hara, , ‘“Ruled By My Friends”’, 28Google Scholar.

31 Worcestershire County Records: Calendar of the Quarter Sessions Papers, Volume I: 1531–1643, ed. Wills-Bund, J. W. (Worcester, 1900), 266–7Google Scholar.

32 Stone, Lawrence, Uncertain Unions: Marriage in England. 1660–1753 (Oxford, 1992), 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Elton, G. R., ‘Reform by Statute: Thomas Starkey's Dialogue and Thomas Cromwell's Policy’, in Elton, , Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government (4 vols., Cambridge, 1974–1992), II, 252Google Scholar, notes a policy paper sent to Cromwell suggesting the prevention of the marriages of young men until they were of ‘potent age’. Dean, David, Law-Making and Society in Late Elizabethan England: The Parliament of England, 1584–1601 (Cambridge, 1996), 184–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reports an abortive bill to prevent ‘sundry great abuses by licenses for marriages without banes’ in the parliamentary session of 1597–8.

34 Levine, and Wrightson, , Industrial Society, 352Google Scholar.

35 Wrightson, and Levine, , Poverty and Piety, 133Google Scholar.

36 O'Hara, , ‘“Ruled By My Friends”’, 28Google Scholar; Hindle, ‘Power, Poor Relief and Social Relations’, passim; MS Ellesmere 6162, fo. 36; Huntington Library, San Marino, Ca.

37 Pelling, Margaret, ‘Old Age, Poverty and Disability in Early Modern Norwich: Work, Remarriage, and Other Expedients’, in Life, Death and the Elderly: Historical Perspectives, ed. Pelling, Margaret and Smith, Richard M. (1991), 88Google Scholar.

38 Ingram, , Church Courts, 215Google Scholar; cf. Hindle, ‘Exclusion Crises’.

39 Walter, John, ‘A “Rising of the People”? The Oxfordshire Rising of 1596’, Past and Present, no. 107 (05 1985), 90–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See the theoretical discussion of the response patterns, including not only obedience and ‘deferred gratification’ but also deviance and rebellion, of those who lose out in systems where reproduction is subject to social control in Lesthaeghe, , ‘Social Control of Human Reproduction’, 533–34Google Scholar.

40 Hertfordshire Record Office D/P 65/3/3, fos 329–31 cited in Hindle, , ‘Exclusion Crises’, 134Google Scholar.

41 Kussmaul, , Servants in Husbandry, 24–7Google Scholar; Souden, David, ‘Migrants and the Population Structure of Later Seventeenth-Century Provincial Cities and Market Towns’, in The Transformation of English Provincial Towns, 1600–1800, ed. Clark, Peter (London, 1984), 150–61Google Scholar; Souden, David, ‘“East, West-Home's Best”? Regional Patterns of Migration in Early Modern England’, in Migration and Society, ed. Clark, and Souden, , 292–332Google Scholar.

42 Stapleton, Barry, ‘Marriage, Migration and Mendicancy in a Pre-Industrial Community’, in Conflict and Community in Southern England: Essays in the History of Rural and Urban Labour From Medieval to Modern Times, ed. Stapleton, Barry (Gloucester, 1992), 56, 62Google Scholar.

43 Levine, , Family Formation, 39Google Scholar.

44 Ingram, ‘Reform of Popular Culture?’; Ingram, Martin, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and Mocking Rhymes’, in Popular Culture, ed. Reay, , 166–97Google Scholar. Thompson, Edward, Customs in Common (1991), 454Google Scholar, notes the use of rough music against exogamous marriage.

45 Quoting the definition of culture in Cohen, A. P., ‘Belonging: The Experience of Culture’, in Belonging: Identity and Social Organisation in British Rural Cultures, ed. Cohen, A. P. (Manchester, 1982)Google Scholar.

46 Citing Phillips, Scott K., ‘Natives and Incomers: the Symbolism of Belonging in Muker Parish, North Yorkshire’, in Symbolising Boundaries: Identity and Diversity in British Cultures, ed. Cohen, A. P. (Manchester, 1986)Google Scholar, reprinted in Michael Drake (ed.), Time, Family and Community: Perspectives on Family and Community History (Oxford, 1994), 234.

47 David Cressy's thorough, though not exhaustive, searches of church court materials do not appear to have turned up any additional instances of the practice: Cressy, , Birth, Marriage and Death, 312Google Scholar.

48 Smith, Richard M., ‘Marriage Processes in the English Past: Some Continuities’, in The World We Have Gained: Histories of Population and Social Structure, ed. Bonfield, Lloyd, Smith, Richard M. and Wrightson, K. E. (Oxford, 1986), 73 n. 101Google Scholar; Smith, Richard M., ‘Charity, Self-interest and Welfare: Reflections From Demograpic and Family History’, in Charity, Self-interest and Welfare in the English Past, ed. Daunton, Martin (London, 1996), 24Google Scholar.

49 Adair, , Courtship, Illegitimacy and Marriage, 138Google Scholar. Cf. Smith, , ‘Charity, Self-interest and Welfare’, 45 n. 3Google Scholar.

50 Ingram, , ‘Spousals Litigation’, 55–6Google Scholar; Ingram, , Church Courts, 131Google Scholar.

51 Whateley, William, A Bride-Busk; or a Direction for Married Persons (1623), 175Google Scholar.

52 Johnson, John, The Clergy-man's Vade Mecum (1709), 186Google Scholar. For Johnson, rector of Cranbrook in Kent, see DNB [s.v. Johnson, John].

53 Reynel, Carew, The True English Interest (1674), 59–67Google Scholar, reprinted in Seventeenth-Century Economic Documents, ed. Joan Thirsk and J. P. Cooper (Oxford, 1972), 758–60, at 760.

54 Sir William Coventry, ‘An Essay Concerning the Decay of Rents and Their Remedies’ [c.1670], reprinted in Seventeenth-Century Economic Documents, ed. Thirsk and Cooper, 79–84, at 80.

55 Dudley North, ‘Some Notes Concerning the Laws for the Poor’ [British Library Additional Manuscripts, 32512, fos. 124v–130v], fo. 128v.

56 Appleby, Joyce Oldham, Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England (Princeton, 1978), 135Google Scholar.

57 North, ‘Some Notes Concerning the Laws For the Poor’, fo. 128v.

58 Coventry, , ‘Decay of Rents’, 80Google Scholar.

59 Johnson, , Clergy Man's Vade Mecum, 186Google Scholar.

60 Reynel, , True English Interest, 760Google Scholar.

61 Brooks, Colin, ‘Projecting, Political Arithmetic and the Act of 1695’, English Historical Review lxxxvii (1982), 39Google Scholar; Boulton, Jeremy, ‘The Marriage Duty Act and Parochial Registration in London, 1695–1706’, in Surveying the People, ed. Schurer, and Arkell, , 227Google Scholar; Davenant, Charles, Works, ed. Whitworth, C. (5 vols., 1771), II, 190–1Google Scholar; London Inhabitants Within the Walls, 1695, ed. Glass, D. V. (London Record Society Publications, ii, 1966), xiv–xvGoogle Scholar. Cf. Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 139Google Scholar.

62 Pressey, W.J., ‘Essex Affairs Matrimonial (As Seen in the Archdeaconry Records)’, Essex Review, xlix (1940), 86Google Scholar.

63 Ingram, , ‘Spousals Litigation’, 56Google Scholar; Ingram, , Church Courts, 131Google Scholar.

64 Reynel, , True English Interest, 760Google Scholar.

65 Coventry, , ‘Decay of Rents’, 80Google Scholar.

66 Johnson, , Clergy Man's Vade Mecum, 186–7Google Scholar.

67 North, ‘Some Notes Concerning the Laws for the Poor’, fos. 128–28v.

68 Quoting Wrightson, Keith, ‘The Politics of the Parish in Early Modern England’, in The Experience of Authority in Early Modern England, ed. Griffiths, Paul, Fox, Adam and Hindle, Steve (Basingstoke, 1996), 19Google Scholar.

69 Solar, Peter M., ‘Poor Relief and English Economic Development Before the Industrial Revolution’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., xlviii (1995), 16Google Scholar.

70 See, for example, the careful criticism of the categories of historical sociology in Tadmor, Naomi, ‘The Concept of the Household-Family in Eighteenth-Century England’, Past and Present, no. 151 (05 1996), 111–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Wrigley, , ‘Family Limitation’; Wrigley, and Schofield, , Population History, xix, 450–3Google Scholar.

72 Wrigley, et al. , English Population History From Family Reconstitution, 125Google Scholar.

73 Cf. the scepticism of Slack, Paul, Poverty and Policy in Tudor and Stuart England (London, 1988), 207–8Google Scholar.