Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:49:49.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

C. H. Firth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One result of the war has been to turn our attention from domestic to foreign affairs. For a long time the British electorate had been so wrapped up in our own constitutional struggles that it was almost completely blind and deaf to other issues. It has been brought back to the affairs of Europe as it were by an earthquake. People who never thought seriously about the relations of England and the Continent, and were content to leave foreign policy to our Foreign Secretaries, begin to form opinions of their own, and will in due season express them at the poll. A new period of our history has begun in which a democracy, hitherto indifferent to external problems and exceptionally ignorant about them, will demand information about these problems, and cannot, without great peril to national interests, be left as uninformed as it is.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 10 , December 1916 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Letters, i. 247, ed. 1827.Google Scholar

1 Dilke, , Present Position of European Politics, 1887, pp, 282–3.Google Scholar

1 Speech, xvii.Google Scholar

2 Hervé, G., Après la Marne, p. 260.Google Scholar

1 Memoirs from 1662–9, Temple, 's Works, i. 286, ed. 1764Google Scholar. Compare Bernard, Montague's Lectures on Subjects connected with Diplomacy, p. 115.Google Scholar

1 I twice heard Lord Goschen tell this story.

1 ‘Toutes ces puissances veulent conserver leurs saillies, remplir leurs échancrures, et s'arrondir enfin suivant l'occasion.’—Mémoires du Comte de Ségur, i. 277 (ed. 1859).Google Scholar

1 Lyall, , Life of Lord Dufferin, p. 544Google Scholar (ed. Nelson). Compare Sorel's prophetic essay entitled ‘La Diplomatie et le Progrès,’ in his Essais d'Histoire et de Critique, 1883, p. 281.Google Scholar

2 Steed, Wickham, Hapsburg Monarchy, pp. 182, 194, 199.Google Scholar

3 Busch, , Bismarck—Some Secret Pages of his History, 3 vols., 1898Google Scholar. Bismarck in the Franco-German War, 2 vols., 1879.Google Scholar

1 October 22, 1914.

1 Browning, Oscar, Preface to England and Napoleon in 1803, x–xi.Google Scholar

1 On their history, see SirHertslet, E., Recollections of the Old Foreign Office, 1901, p. 145.Google Scholar

1 First Report of the Public Records Commission, ii. 63.Google Scholar

1 Duclerc, M. to the President of the Republic, 12 23, 1882Google Scholar. ‘Vous remarquerez avec moi, M. le Président, l'activité et la persévérance de la Commission dans l'accomplissement de l'œuvre en vue de laquelle elle avait été formée, c'est-à-dire la communication à la fois prudente et libérale des documents historiques conservés au Dépôt des Affaires Étrangères.’ — Rapport, 1880–1882, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar

2 The changes in the French regulations may be thus summarised. The Decree of 1874 opened the F.O. papers up to 1713; that of 1879 up to 1792; that of 1880 up to 1814; that of 1891 up to 1830.

1 See Rapport sur les Travaux de la Commission des Archives Diplomatiques for 1880–1882, p. 15.Google Scholar

2 See Rapport, 1880–1882, p. 18Google Scholar; 1905–7, p. 11. The Committee terms the collection when completed ‘A la fois un monument incomparable des traditions de la politique extérieure de la France et une œuvre pratique pour l'éducation diplomatique de notre démocratie.’ They then proceed, with the same object, to recommend a second series of publications. ‘Pour que ce dernier but fût atteint, il ne suffirait pas du Recueil des instructions. Par celui-ci, on peut connaître les idées directrices de l'action de la France dans le monde, les intérêts permanents et essentiels qu'elle s'est efforcée de défendre. Il ne serait pas moins nécessaire que l'on pût se rendre compte de quelle manière ces idées se sont manifestées et ces intérêts ont été sauvegardés.’ Hence the necessity for this new series of publications, in which ‘il faudrait que toutes les formes de l'activité diplomatique pussent trouver place: recueils de dépêches embrassant une mission et une négociation complète; actes des congrès qui ont abouti à des traités généraux réglant pour un temps le statut international des contractants; relations des ambassadeurs ou envoyés, quand elles existent.’

1 See Rapport, 1884, p. 10Google Scholar. Besides the correspondence of Castillon and Marillac the series includes the correspondence of Barthélemy.

2 Rapport, 1889–1890, pp. 9, 21Google Scholar; 1894–1904, p. 13.

1 E.g., Driault, E. and Monod, G., Histoire Contemporaine (1815–1908)Google Scholar; or Malet, A., L'Époque Contemporaine.Google Scholar

2 Transactions, New Series, vol. xviii, pp. 12–31.Google Scholar

1 The Cambridge Historical Series, edited by DrProthero, , which now numbers 23 volumesGoogle Scholar. Volumes on Modern Germany and Modern France, since 1815, are now in the press; and a volume on Austria-Hungary is in preparation.

2 Since this was written the first volume of SirWard, A. W.'s History of Modern Germany has been added to the series.Google Scholar

3 London, 1915 (Allen and Unwin).