Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:01:51.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE IRISH PEERAGE AND THE ACT OF UNION, 1800–1971

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2002

Abstract

THERE was always an important, though varying, distinction between the Irish peerage and the Irish House of Lords. The former dated from the late twelfth century, and the latter, or at least something discernible as its forerunner, from the late thirteenth. From then until the early seventeenth century, because men who were neither temporal nor spiritual peers attended the House of Lords (though in decreasingly significant numbers) by virtue of a writ of summons only, the House of Lords was a larger body than the Irish peerage. Thereafter, due to the number of non-Irishmen and/or non-residents who were created Irish peers, the House of Lords became the smaller body, because such people seldom or never attended.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Francis G. James,Lords of the Ascendancy: the Irish House of Lords and its Members, 1600–1800(Dublin, 1995), pp. 20–2; T.W. Moody, ‘The Irish Parliament under Elizabeth and James I: a General Survey’, inProceedings of the Royal Irish Academy(hereafter,Proc. RIA) vol.xlv(1939), 55; R.P. Gadd,The Peerage of Ireland, with Lists of all Irish Peerages, Past and Present(Irish Peers Association, 1985), 7–10 andpassim, together with Gadd,Errata: Addenda(1987).