Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T20:18:50.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Age of Uncertainty: Britain in the Early-Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

David Eastwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One does not have to be a card-carrying postmodernist to understand that historical periods do not possess inherent characteristics. ‘Eras of Reform’, ‘Ages of Revolution’, ‘Triumphs of Reform’, and ‘Centuries of Reformation’ exist only in, and as, texts. They represent, in the simplest of forms, readings of the past. The nomenclatures we employ to demarcate and characterise particular historical moments embody fundamental ideological assumptions, encapsulating an idée fixe, and exposing the crux of the creative—or, if you prefer, the scholarly—process. Traditionalists might already be crying foul, insisting that our titles, or period characterisations, reflect rather than impute salience. History, as Geoffrey Elton might have instructed us, reports rather than constructs the past. The writing of history, Elton suggested in 1967, ‘amounts to a dialogue between the historian and his materials. He supplies the intelligence and the organising ability, but he can interpret and organise only within the limits set by his materials. And those are the limits created by a true and independent past.’ Revealingly, though, our book titles generally describe or construct processes, rather than recall events; and processes are abstractions whose full meaning, as Vico told us long ago, is apparent only in retrospect. Of course the Reformation happened, but not in the same way as the Battle of Trafalgar happened. Thus describing the sixteenth century as ‘The Age of Reformation’ orders the experience of the European West in a very particular way. It was also, and some might say equally, an age of exploration, of empire, of inflation, of hunger, and of the explosion of print culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 8 , December 1998 , pp. 91 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Elton, Geoffrey, The Practice of History (1967), 120Google Scholar, cf. 11–20. This position has been restated, albeit with refinements and a more apparently sympathetic reception of the role of theory, in Evans, Richard J., In Defence of History (1997)Google Scholar.

2 Vico, Giambattista, The New Science [3rd edn., 1744] (trans Bergin, T. G. and Fisch, M. H., Ithaca and London, 1984)Google Scholar; Berlin, Isaiah, Vico and Herder. Two Studies in the History of Ideas (1976), 3–142Google Scholar; and Haddock, Bruce A., ‘Vico and the Methodology of the History of Ideas’, in Vico: Past and Present, ed. Tagliacozzo, Giorgio (Atlantic Highlands, 1981), 227–39Google Scholar.

3 Dunn, John, ‘Revolution’, in Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L. eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge, 1989), 333–56Google Scholar, esp. 334–5; idem, Modern Revolutions: An Introduction to the Analysis of a Political Phenomenon (Cambridge, 1972).

4 Burke's most neutral characterization of the Revolution as ‘the late proceedings in France’ was uncharacteristically understated, but it captured the idea of process for all that: Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in Frame [1790] (ed. O'Brien, C.C., Harmondsworth, 1969), 85Google Scholar.

5 Halévy, Elie, England in 1815 (1913, first English edn. 1923)Google Scholar; The Liberal Awakening (1923, first English edn., 1926); The Triumph of Reform (1830–1841) (1923, first English edn., 1927). Interestingly in the cases of volumes two and three a rather different English title was superimposed, indicating the influence of an existing liberal teleology. The French titles of volumes two and three were: Du lendemain de Waterloo à la veille du Reform Bill and De la crise du reform Bill a l'avenement de Sir Robert Peel. See Chase, Myrna, Elie Halévy. An Intellectual Biography (New York, 1980)Google Scholar.

6 Woodward, Llewellyn, The Age of Reform 1815–1870 [1938] (2nd edn., Oxford, 1962), 629Google Scholar.

7 Briggs, Asa, The Age of Improvement, 1783–1867 (1959)Google Scholar.

8 Wesley, Addison Longman, History Catalogue (1997), p. 12Google Scholar.

9 Evans, Eric J., The Forging of the Modem State. Early Industrial Britain 1783–1870 (1983), 177–269Google Scholar.

10 Derry, John, Reaction and Reform. England in the Early Nineteenth Century (1963), 4Google Scholar.

11 Gash, Norman, Aristocracy and People. Britain 1815–1865 (1979), 7,8, 350Google Scholar and passim; cf. McCord, Norman, British History, 1815–1906 (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar.

12 Finlayson, G.B.A.M., Britain in the Eighteenth Thirties. Decade of Reform (1969), 107Google Scholar.

13 Lubenow, William C., The Politics of Government Growth. Early Victorian Attitudes Towards State Intervention 1833–1848 (Newton Abbot, 1971), 188Google Scholar.

14 Newbould, Ian, Whiggery and Reform 1830–41. The Politics of Government (Basingstoke and London, 1990), 321Google Scholar. As a reading this is a more persuasive account of Peelism than Whiggism, and insights into Peelite Conservatism were perceptively developed in Newbould, Ian, ‘Sir Robert Peel and the Conservative Party, 1831–41: A Study in Failure?’, English Historical Review, xcviii (1983), 527–57Google Scholar.

15 Brent, Richard, Liberal Anglican Politics. Whiggery, Religion, and Reform 1830–1841 (Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar.

16 Machin, G. I. T., Politics and the Churches in Great Britain 1832 to 1868 (Oxford, 1977), 28–111Google Scholar; Smith, R.J., The Gothic Bequest. Medieval Institutions in British Thought, 1688–1863 (Cambridge, 1980), 171–200Google Scholar; Gash, Norman, Reaction and Reconstruction in English Politics 1832–1852 (Oxford, 1965), 60–118Google Scholar.

17 Mandler, Peter, Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform. Whigs and Liberals 1830–1852 (Oxford, 1990), esp. 110–99, 275–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar and passim.

18 See also Parry's, Jonathan always suggestive and subtle The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain (New Haven and London, 1993)Google Scholar.

19 Mandler, , Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform, 119–20Google Scholar.

20 Hilton, Boyd, The Age of Atonement. The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought 1785–1865 (Oxford, 1988), 3Google Scholar. See also Waterman, A. C. M., ‘The Ideological Alliance of Political Economy and Christian Theology, 1798–1833’, Jnl. Ecclesiastical History, xxiv (1983), 231–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Waterman, A.C. M., Revolution, Economy, and Religion. Christian Political Economy, 1798–1833 (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soloway, R. A., Prelates and People. Ecclesiastical Social Thought in England 1783–1852 (1969)Google Scholar.

21 See for example his treatment of Perceval, Copleston, Ashley, Sadler, and Oastler; Hilton, , Age of Atonement, pp. 29–30, 212–13, 219Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., p. 65 and passim.

23 Briggs, , Age of Improvement, 2–3Google Scholar.

14 For a striking and persuasive broadening of the terrain of contemporary debate see Gambles, A.C., ‘The Boundaries of Political Economy: Tory Economic Argument 1806–1847’ (University of Oxford, D.Phil, thesis, 1996)Google Scholar; and idem, ‘Rethinking the Politics of Protection: Conservatism and the Corn Laws, 1830–52’, EHR forthcoming, Sept. 1998. Perkin's, Harold classic The Origins of Modem English Society 1780–1880 (1969), 237–52Google Scholar, remains as sane and satisfying as ever. Differently cast are Sack, James J., From Jacobite to Conservative. Reaction and Orthodoxy in Britain c. 1760–1832 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; and Hole, Robert, Pulpits, Politics and Public Order in England 1760–1832 (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Clark, J.C.D., English Society 1688–1832 (Cambridge, 1985), 64–75Google Scholar, quotation at p. 65. I am uncertain what ‘belated’ can mean in this context.

26 Veitch, G.S., Genesis of Parliamentary Reform (1913)Google Scholar; Dickinson, H. T., Liberty and Property. Political Ideology in Eighteenth-Century Britain (1977)Google Scholar.

27 Clark, , English Society, 199–200Google Scholar.

28 Clark, , English Society, 262Google Scholar. For rather different readings see Dinwiddy, J. R., Radicalism and Reform in Britain 1780–1850 (1992), 195–206, 229–52Google Scholar; and Eastwood, David, ‘Patriotism and the English State in the 1790s’, in The French Revolution and British Popular Politics, ed. Philp, Mark (Oxford, 1991), 146–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Crafts, N. F. R., British Economic Growth During the Industrial Revolution (Oxford, 1985)Google Scholar.

30 For critiques see Hoppit, Julian, ‘Counting the Industrial Revolution’, Ec[onomic] H[istory] R[eview], xliii (1990), 173–93Google Scholar; Berg, Maxine and Hudson, Pat, ‘Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution’, Ec.H.R., xlv (1992), 24–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hudson, Pat, The Industrial Revolution (1992)Google Scholar.

31 Cannadine, David, ‘The Past and the Present in the Industrial Revolution 1880–1980’, Past and Present, 103 (1984), 131–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Toynbee, A., Lectures on the Industrial Revolution (1884)Google Scholar; , J. L. and Hammond, B., The Town Labourer, 1760–1832 (1917)Google Scholar; , J. L. and Hammond, B., The Rise of Modern Industry (1925)Google Scholar; Ashton, T.S., The Industrial Revolution, 1760–1830 (1948)Google Scholar; Rostow, W. W., The British Economy of the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1948)Google Scholar. For figures see Crafts, , British Economic Growth, p. 32Google Scholar.

32 Wrigley, E. A., Continuity, Chance and Change. The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England (Cambridge, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Rodger, Richard, Housing in Urban Britain 1780–1914 (new edn., Cambridge, 1995), 19Google Scholar. The expenditure of such as high proportion of national capital on what was often poor-quality housing is explained partly by the sheer pace of urbanisation and partly by the still modest rates of capital formation.

34 Southey, Robert, Letters from England [1807] ed. and intro Simmons, Jack (Gloucester, 1984), 203Google Scholar. For Southey as a social critic see Eastwood, David, ‘Robert Southey and the Intellectual Origins of Romantic Conservatism’, English Historical Review, Civ (1989), 308–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘“Ruinous Prosperity”. Robert Southey's Critique of the Commercial System’, The Wordsworth Circle, xxv (1994), 72–76; Cobban, Alfred, Edmund Burke and the Revolt Against the Eighteenth Century (2nd edn., 1960), 197–232Google Scholar.

35 Southey, , Letters from England, 210–11Google Scholar.

36 Escher, H.C., ‘Escher's Letters from England in 1814’, in Industrial Britain under the Regency 1814–18 ed. Henderson, W. O. (New York, 1968), 34–5Google Scholar.

37 [d'Eichthal, Gustave], A French Sociobgist Looks at Britain. Gustave d'Eichthal and British Society in 1828 eds. Radcliffe, Barrie M. and Chaloner, W.H. (Manchester University Press, 1977), 7Google Scholar.

38 Faucher, Leon, Manchester in 1844. Its Present Condition and Future Prospects ed. and trans. Culverwell, J. P. (London and Manchester, 1844), 3–4Google Scholar.

39 Canrnell, Geoffrey, Robert Southey and His Age—The Development of a Conservative Mind (Oxford, 1960)Google Scholar; Simmons, Jack, Southey (1945)Google Scholar; Robert Southey. The Critical Heritage, ed. Madden, Lionel (London and Boston, 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Curry, Kenneth, Southey (London and Boston, 1975)Google Scholar; Mendilow, Jonathan, The Romantic Tradition in British Political Thought (1986), 47–82Google Scholar; Eastwood, ‘Robert Southey and the Intellectual Origins of Romantic Conservatism’.

40 Macaulay's, unsigned review appeared in the Edinburgh Review, I (01 1830), 528–65Google Scholar, and was widely reprinted: see Macaulay, Lord, Critical and Historical Essays (3 vols, 1878), i, 217–69Google Scholar; Fontana, Biancamaria, Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society. The Edinburgh Review 1802–32 (Cambridge, 1985), 76–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Southey, Robert, Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of Society (2 vols., 1829), i, 166, 169–70Google Scholar.

42 Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain [1842] (ed. and intro. Flinn, M. W., Edinburgh, 1965), 78–9Google Scholar. For the Report and its influence see Lewis, R. A., Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement 1832–1854 (1952), esp. 29–105Google Scholar; Finer, S. E., The Life and Times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (1952), 209–42Google Scholar; Brundage, Anthony, England's “Prussian Minister”. Edwin Chadwick and the Politics of Government Growth, 1832–1854 (University Park Pennsylvania and London, 1988), 79–172Google Scholar.

43 Itself an expanded version of Gaskell's, The Manufacturing Population of England (1833)Google Scholar. See also Kay, J. P., The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes Employed in Cotton Manufacture in Manchester (1832)Google Scholar; Lees, Andrew, Cities Perceived. Urban Society in European and American Thought 1820–1940 (Manchester, 1985), 16–39Google Scholar; and Turner, Michael, Reform and Respectability. The Making of a Middle-Class Liberalism in Early Nineteenth-Century Manchester (Manchester, Chetham Society, 3rd ser., xl, 1995), 164–208Google Scholar.

44 Engels, Friedrich, The Condition of the Working Class in England [1845] (Eng. trans. Henderson, W. O. and Chaloner, W.H., Stanford, 1958), 311–12Google Scholar. See also Marcus, Steven, Engels, Manchester and the Working Class (1974)Google Scholar; Carver, Terrell, Friedrich Engels. His Life and Thought (Basingstoke and London, 1989), 95–132Google Scholar.

45 Carlyle, Thomas, ‘Signs of the Times’ [1829]Google Scholar, reprinted in Critical and Miscellaneous Essays (4 vols., 1857), ii, 100–1.

46 Eliot, George, Passages Selected from the Writings of Thomas Carlyle (1855)Google Scholar quoted in Himmelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty. England in the Early Industrial Age (London and Boston, 1984), 202Google Scholar.

47 We currendy lack the necessary modern critical study of Carlyle which attends to his inner voice and properly maps his influence, but see Himmelfarb, , Idea of Poverty, 191–206Google Scholar; Froude, J. A., Thomas Carlyle: A History of the First Forty Years of his Life (2 vols., 1882)Google Scholar; Froude, J. A., Thomas Carlyle: A History of His Life in London 1834–1881 (2 vols., 1881)Google Scholar; Rosenberg, Philip, The Seventh Hero: Thomas Carlyle and the Theory of Political Activism (Cambridge Mass., 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomas Carlyle: The Critical Heritage ed. Seigel, J. P. (1971)Google Scholar.

48 Carlyle, Thomas, Chartism [1839]Google Scholar reprinted in Carlyle, Sartor Resartus. Lecture on Heros. Chartism. Past and Present (1894), 37–8.

49 Ibid., p. 10.

50 Eastwood, David, ‘“Amplifying the Province of the Legislature”: the Flow of Information and the English State in the Early Nineteenth Century’, Historical Research, 62 (1989), 276–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Re-Reading the Constitution. New Narratives in the Political History of England's Long Nineteenth Century, ed. Vernon, James (Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar; Eastwood, David, Making Public Policy in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Swansea, 1998)Google Scholar; Williams, Karel, From Pauperism to Poverty (London, Boston, and Henley, 1981), esp. 235–308Google Scholar.

51 Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (ed. Edwin, Cannan, 1904)Google Scholar, esp. bk. 1 chs. 1, 3, 8,; bk. 2 ch. 1; bk. 4 chs. 7, 8, 9.

52 Winch, Donald, Riches and Poverty. An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834 (Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar; cf. Himmelfarb, , Idea of Poverty, 42–144Google Scholar; Petersen, William, Malthus (1979), 38–134, 218–40Google Scholar; James, Patricia, Population Malthus. His Life and Times (London, Boston, and Henley, 1979), 55–159Google Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., ‘Malthus and the Prospects for the Labouring Poor’, Historical Jnl., 31 (1988), 813–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Malthus, T. R., An Essay on the Principle of Population [1798 edn.]. ed. and intro., Flew, A. (Harmondsworth, 1970)Google Scholar; Malthus, T. R., An Essay in the Principle of Population [1803 edn.], ed. and intro. Hollingsworth, T.H. (Everyman edn., 1973)Google Scholar; Malthus, T. R., Principles of Political Economy Considered with a View to their Practical Application (1820)Google Scholar; Malthus, T. R., Observations on the Effects of the Corn Laws … (2nd edn., 1814)Google Scholar.

54 Ricardo, David, Principles of Political Economy [1817], ed. Sraffa, P. (Cambridge, 1951)Google Scholar; Berg, Maxine, The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy 1815–1848 (Cambridge, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge, 1983), 63–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Hilton, , Age of Atonement, esp. 203–51Google Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, Corn, Cash, Commerce. The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments 1815–1830 (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, ‘Peel: A Reappraisal’, Historical Jnl., 22 (1979), 585–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brady, Alexander, William Huskisson and Liberal Reform (Oxford, 1928)Google Scholar; Jenkins, Brian, Henry Goulbum 1784–1856. A Political Biography (Liverpool, 1996)Google Scholar; esp. 150–2, 185–214, 288–356; Jones, W.D., ‘Prosperity’ Robinson. The Life of Viscount Goderich 1782–1859 (1967), 65–134Google Scholar.

57 See, e.g., The Trial of Feargus O'Connor and Fify-Eight Others on a Charge of Sedition, Conspiracy, Tumult and Riot (Manchester and London, 1843), viiGoogle Scholar. The case is also compellingly made in Hilton, , Age of Atonement, p. 65Google Scholar.

58 Wiener, Martin, Reconstructing the Criminal. Culture, Law, and Policy in England, 1830–1914 (Cambridge, 1990), 29Google Scholar.

59 Report from His Majesty's Commissioners for Inquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Laws, Parliamentary Papers, xxvii (44), 36–55Google Scholar.

60 Eastwood, David, Government and Community in the English Provinces 1700–1870 (1997), 123–70Google Scholar; Eastwood, David, ‘Rethinking the Debates on the Poor Law in Early Nineteenth-Century England’, Utilitas, 6 (1994), 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Godwin, William, Of Population. An Enquiry Concerning the Power of Increase of the Numbers of Mankind (1820)Google Scholar; Godwin, William, Thoughts Occasioned by a Perusal of Dr Parr's Spital Sermon … [1801], in Political and Philosophical Writings of William Godwin ed. Philp, Mark (7 vols., 1993), ii, 163–208Google Scholar; Sadler, Michael Thomas, The Law of Population … In Disproof of the Superfercundity of Human Beings and Developing the Real Principle of their Increase (2 vols., 1830)Google Scholar; Perkin, , Origins of Modern English Society, 137–52Google Scholar; Eastwood, ‘Robert Southey and the Intellectual Origins of Romantic Conservatism’.

62 Porter, G. R., The Progress of the Nation (3 vols., 1836–1843)Google Scholar; Brown, Lucy, The Board of Trade and the Free-Trade Movement 1830–42 (Oxford, 1958), 27–31, 76–93Google Scholar; Prouty, Roger, The Transformation of the Board of Trade (1957), 3–10, 99Google Scholar.

63 Cullen, Michael J., The Statistical Movement in Early Victorian Britain. The Foundations of Empirical Social Science (Hassocks, 1975)Google Scholar; Ashton, Thomas S., Economic and Social Investigations in Manchester, 1833–1933 (1934)Google Scholar.

64 Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population, 251–4; Lewis, R. A., Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement 1832–1854 (1952), 17–18, 62–6Google Scholar; Finer, S. E., The Life and Times of Edwin Chadwick (1952), 22–3Google Scholar.

65 Census of England and Wales (1861), ‘Report’, Parliamentary Papers, 1863, liii, 24–7, quotation at 27.

66 Chartism, 26–7, orig. italics, cf. ‘Signs of Times’, 116–18. Carlyle's Chartism was conceived whilst working on his French Revolution, and this conjunction is crucial to understanding both the language and sense of revolutionary imminence which infuse Chartism.

67 Macaulay, T. B., ‘Mirabeau’ [1832]Google Scholar, reprinted in The Miscellaneous Wirings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay (1889), 275. See also Clive, John, Thomas Babington Macaulay. The Shaping of the Historian (1973), 142–76Google Scholar.

68 Macaulay, , ‘Mirabeau’, 630Google Scholar. Burrow, John, A Liberal Descent. Victorian Historians and the English Past (Cambridge, 1981), 11–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winch, Collini, and Burrow, , That Noble Science of Politics, 91–126Google Scholar; Ghosh, Peter, ‘Macaulay and the Heritage of the Enlightenment’, EHR, cxii (1997), 358–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Quinault, Roland, ‘The French Revolution of 1830 and Parliamentary Reform’, History, 79 (1994), 377–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. Flick, Carlos, The Birmingham Political Union and the Movements for Reform in Britain 1830–1839 (Folkestone, 1978), 54–92Google Scholar; Brock, Michael, The Great Reform Act (1973), 161–313Google Scholar; Cannon, John, Parliamentary Reform, 1660–1832 (Cambridge, 1972), 204–41Google Scholar.

70 Baines, Edward, The life of Edward Baines (London and Leeds, 1851), 157–61Google Scholar; Salmon, Philip, ‘Electoral Reform at Work. Local Politics and National Parties, 1832–1841’, (University of Oxford D.Phil, thesis, 1997)Google Scholar; Seymour, Charles, Electoral Reform in England and Wales. The Development and Operation of the Parliamentary Franchise 1832–1885 (new edn., Newton Abbot, 1971), 7–164Google Scholar; Prest, John, Politics in the Age of Cobden (1977)Google Scholar.

71 In a large literature see esp. Thompson, Dorothy, The Chartists. Popular Politics in the Industrial Revolution (1984)Google Scholar; Pickering, Paul, Chartism and the Chartists in Manchester and Salford (1995)Google Scholar.

72 Trial of Feargus O'Connor, vi.

73 Jones, Gareth Stedman, Languages of Class. Studies in English Working Class History 1832–1982 (Cambridge, 1983), 90–178Google Scholar; Epstein, James, Radical Expression. Political Language, Ritual, and Symbol in England 1790–1850 (Oxford, 1994)Google Scholar; Taylor, Miles, The Decline of British Radicalism 1847–1860 (Oxford, 1995), esp. 19–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Finn, Margot, After Chartism. Class and Nation in English Radical Politics, 1848–1974 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar.

74 Hilton, , Corn, Cash, Commerce, 171–302Google Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, ‘The Ripening of Robert Peel’ in Public and Private Doctrine: Essays in British History Presented to Maurice Cowling ed. Bentley, M. (Cambridge, 1993), 63–84Google Scholar; Gordon, Barry, Economic Doctrine and Tory Liberalism 1824–1830 (1979)Google Scholar; Brock, W. R., Lord Liverpool and Liberal Toryism 1820 to 1827 (2nd edn., 1967)Google Scholar; Gash, Norman, Lord Liverpool (1984), 171–91, 217–30Google Scholar.

75 Matthews, R. C. O., A Study in Trade-Cycle History. Economic Fluctuations in Great Britain, 1833–1842 (Cambridge, 1954), 164Google Scholar, cf. 142–7, 219–20; Gayer, A.D., Rostow, W. W., and Schwartz, A.J., The Growth and Fluctuation of the British Economy, 1700–1850 (2 vols., Oxford, 1953), i, 276–303Google Scholar; Clark, G. Kitson, ‘Hunger and Politics in 1842’, Jnl. Modern History, xxv (1953), 355–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Hansard, 3rd ser., xlv, 543, my ital.; see also Hardy, William, ‘Conceptions of Manufacturing Advance in British Politics c.1800–1847, with special reference to Parliament, Governments and their Advisers’ (Univ. of Oxford, D.Phil, thesis, 1994), 279–95Google Scholar.

77 Hansard, 3rd ser., lxi (1842), 422–66; SirNorthcote, Stafford, Twenty Tears of Financial Policy (1862), 1–58Google Scholar; Buxton, Sydney, Finance and Politics. An Historical Study 1783–1885 (2 vols., 1888), i 43–63Google Scholar; Eastwood, David, ‘“Recasting Our Lot”: Peel, the Nation, and the Politics of Interest’, in A Union of Multiple Identities. The British Isles, c.1750–c.1850 (Manchester, 1997), 29–44, esp. 32–5Google Scholar. For a different and important reading see Hilton, ‘Peel: A Reappraisal’.

78 Peel, to Croker, , 3 Aug. 1841, pr. in Sir Robert Peel from his Private Papers ed. Parker, C.S. (3 vols., 1899), ii, 529Google Scholar.

79 See also Hilton, , Age of Atonemnet, pp. 255–97Google Scholar.