Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T11:53:10.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Select Bibliography 1961–1962

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law Bulletin for 1962
Information
Traditio , Volume 18 , 1962 , pp. 482 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 New York, Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography 1961–1962

The following special abbreviations will be used: AJLH = American Journal of Legal History; BIHR = Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research; JTS = Journal of Theological Studies; Med. Studies Gwynn = Medieval Studies Presented to Aubrey Gwynn S.J., ed. Watt, J. A., Morrall, J. B., Martin, F. X. (Dublin 1961). — At the time this Bulletin went to press, the first volume of papers read at the Bartolus Congress in Perugia (1958), Bartolo da Sassoferrato I (Milan 1961), had not yet been received, although some contributors have sent their offprints to the Institute. These will be included in a fuller listing of the contents of the volume in next year's issue. Likewise, vol. 6 of Studi Gregoriani (Rome 1961) and the Actes du Congrès de l'ancienne Université d'Orléans: Recueil des conférences prononcées les 6 et 7 mai 1961… (Orléans 1962) were not received in time for inclusion in this year's bibliography. S. K. Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. W., ‘The Intellectual Preparation for the Canon of 1215 against Ordeals,’ Speculum 36 (1961) 613–63. Canonistic interpretations (mostly MS material) of the conflicting texts in C. 2 q. 5 (pp. 618ff.); theological Institute of Research and Study in Medieval Canon Law opinions (626ff.); discusses the possible influence of Huguccio and Peter the Chanter on Innocent III in 4 Conc. Lat. c. 18.Google Scholar
Benson, R., ‘Rufin,’ DDC 7 (1961) 779–84. Biographie; L'œuvre du canoniste; Œuvres mineures; Droit public.Google Scholar
Bernhard, J., La Collection en deux livres (Cod. Vat. lat. 3832), I: La forme primitive de la collection en deux livres, source de la collection en 74 titres et de la collection d'Anselme de Lucques (Strasbourg 1962), 601 pp. [pp. 1–238 also as Nos. 1–2 of RDC 12 (1962)]. Starting from the differences between the capitulatio and the text of the collection in the Vatican MS, the author postulates an original recension (IILA), antedating not only the collection as transmitted (IILB), but also the collection in 74 titles, of which Vat. lat. 3832 has thus far always been considered a derivative. Annotated edition of the canons; discussion of common readings in IILB, 74 tit., Anselm, and Dictatus papae, as a clue to the relationship assumed by the author.Google Scholar
Bieler, L., ‘Towards an Interpretation of the So-called “Canones Wallici”,’ Med. Studies Gwynn 387–92. Determines the canones as ‘a formulation of customary law designed for a rural community of archaic type’ with three canons on penance appended in one version; resulting from Frankish-Welsh syncretism in Britanny.Google Scholar
Calasso, F., ‘L'eredità di Bartolo,’ ASD 3/4 (1959/60) 65–82.Google Scholar
Chaney, W. A., ‘Aethelberht's Code and the King's Number,’ AJLH 6 (1962) 151–77. Discusses the pagan-religious background of the nine-fold compensation for robbing the king, as contrasted with the eleven-fold compensation for a bishop's property.Google Scholar
Cheney, C. R., ‘A Group of Related Synodal Statutes of the Thirteenth Century,’ Med. Studies Gwynn 114–32. Discusses the complex interrelations of the statutes of Dublin (Wilkins 1.548, sub anno 1217), Chichester (Wilkins 2.169, s.a. 1289), York (Wilkins 2.285, s.a. 1306); the original text is a synod of York c. 1241–55 (whence Dublin, before 1261), enlarged c. 1306.Google Scholar
Cheney, C. R., ‘Rules for the Observance of Feast-Days in Medieval England,’ BIHR 34 (1961) 117–47. Materials from Thomas Chobham's Summa de penitentia, from provincial and diocesan statutes; appendix of fifteen mostly unpublished texts.Google Scholar
Cheney, C. R., ‘A Letter of Innocent III and the Lateran Decree on Cistercian Tithe-Paying,’ Cîteaux: Commentarii Cistercienses 13 (1962) 146–51. Discusses and publishes a newly discovered letter (Cambridge, Univ. Libr. MS Ff. 4.1, fol. 130va) dated 19 July 1214, which may well be the commonitio nostra addressed to the Cistercians, mentioned in 4 Conc. Lat. c. 55.Google Scholar
Mary Cheney, C. R., and ‘A Draft Decretal of Pope Innocent III in a Case of Identity,’ Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Bibliotheken 41 (1961) 29–47. Discussion and edition of a letter entered on fol. 74r-75r of MS Vat. Pal. 658 of the Glossa Palatina and also found in part as c. 33 of Coll. Abrinc. II (cf. this Bulletin, Trad. 15 [1959] 446, 480): the letter is obviously only a draft of the pope's decision in the suit of a man who is either a returning husband or an impostor.Google Scholar
Coing, H., ‘La pre-recezione in Germania,’ ASD 3/4 (1959/60) 1–34. (On the importance of ecclesiastical jurisdiction as a channel of Roman law: p. 8ff.).Google Scholar
Cortese, E., ‘“Iustitia” e principio soggettivo nel pensiero civilistico medievale,’ ibid. 119–54. Analyzes the interpretations of iustitia as ‘voluntas’ etc. (Ulp. D. 1.1.10 pr.; Inst. 1.1.pr.) in the glossators and commentators; sources, interrelations, doctrinal differences; the dichotomies iustitia-ius, iustitia-equitas. Google Scholar
Couvreur, G., Les pauvres ont-ils des droits? Recherches sur le vol en cas d'extrême nécessité depuis la Concordia de Gratien (1140) jusqu'à Guillaume d'Auxerre († 1231) (Analecta Gregoriana 111; Rome 1961), xxxix, 346 pp. Based on a detailed examination of the writings of legists, canonists, and theologians; with the publication of copious materials from 63 MSS. (Tables showing the use of Roman law texts by writers of theology and canon law: pp. 323-5.) Google Scholar
Cross, F. L., ‘History and Fiction in the African Canons,’ JTS n.s. 12 (1961) 227–47. An important revision of the corpus of African texts in the Western tradition: only the ‘Hippo Breviary’ and the ‘Council of Carthage’ in Dionysius Exiguus can be considered safe historical texts; to these, Carthage 525 and the secondary tradition in Ferrandus and Cresconius may be added. (Critical observations on the 'Carthage Register [= ante c. 34-c. 133] in Dion.: pp. 235ff.; on the Apiarian matter as a propaganda compilation: pp. 246ff.; cf. tabulation p. 246).Google Scholar
Diaz y Diaz, M. C., Index scriptorum latinorum medii aevi hispanorum (Madrid 1959), XX, 582 pp. Composed in a form similar to Dekker's Clavis patrum latinorum, with indication of MSS, editions, critical studies. Includes information on councils, canonical collections, writers on the two laws.Google Scholar
Dilcher, H., ‘Geldkondemnation und Sachkondemnation in der mittelalterlichen Rechtstheorie,’ ZRG Rom. Abt. 78 (1961) 277–307. (Canonists shortly considered, pp. 302-5).Google Scholar
Duggan, C., ‘The Trinity Collection of Decretals and the Early Worcester Family,’ this Bulletin for 1961, Traditio 17.506-26.Google Scholar
Duggan, C., ‘The Becket Dispute and the Criminous Clerks,’ BIHR 35 (1962) 1–28. Reexamines the material from Gratian and contemporary decretists, and concludes, reversing Maitland's judgment, that the better opinion was not that of Henry II's lawyers, but Becket's.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. P., ‘Irish Representatives and Irish Ecclesiastical Affairs at the Fourth Lateran Council,’ Med. Studies Gwynn 90–113. (Some letters of Innocent III discussed: pp. 95ff.) Google Scholar
Dvornik, F., The Ecumenical Councils (Twentieth Century Encyclopedia of Catholicism 82; New York 1961). (On the medieval councils: ch. 2, pp. 47–66.) Google Scholar
Fink-Errera, G., ‘Une institution du monde médiéval: la “pecia”,’ Revue philosophique de Louvain 60 (1962) 184–243.Google Scholar
Firth, F. C.S.B., ‘More about Robert of Flamborough's Penitential,’ this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17.531-2.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R.: see Jus Romanum Medii Aevi.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, H., ‘Das Ökumenische Konzil und seine historischen Grundlagen,’ Geschichte als Wissenschaft und Unterricht (1961) 672–95. Discusses inter al. the transformation of the concept of concilium universale, concilium generale during the Reform of the 11th cent. (pp. 681ff.).Google Scholar
Ganshof, F. L., ‘Droit romain dans le “Liber Floridus”,’ TRG 29 (1961) 432–44. Establishes the source (Isid. Etym. 5.2–4) for the text ‘De legibus diuinis et humanis… aut gentium’ in the encyclopedie collection (Lib. Flor.) of Lambert of St. Omer, , c. 1120 (MS Gand Univ. 92, fol. 229 lin. 13–20). A further study on the canon law sources of lin. 1–13 is to follow.Google Scholar
García Gallo, A., ‘San Isidoro jurista,’ Isidoriana: Estudios sobre San Isidoro de Sevilla en el XIV centenario de su nacimiento (León 1961) 133–41.Google Scholar
Genzmer, E.: see Ius Romanum Medii Aevi.Google Scholar
Gericke, W., ‘Das Glaubensbekenntnis der “Konstantinischen Schenkung”,’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 1–76. Discusses the stratification and considers it probable that the primicerius Christophorus was connected with this portion of the Constitutum. Google Scholar
Gericke, W., ‘Konstantinische Schenkung und Silvesterlegende in neuer Sicht,’ ibid. 293–304. A reply to Fuhrmann's criticism (cf. Bulletin for 1960, Traditio 16.565f.).Google Scholar
Gibert, R., ‘Fuentes del derecho visigótico,’ ASD 3/4 (1959/60) 315–21. A summary of recent views, especially on the Code of Euric and the Breviary of Alaric (the latter not to be considered the exclusive law of the Hispano-Romans, nor a territorial law, but subsidiary to Cod. Eur., esp. for Romans).Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J. T., ‘Canon Law Aspects of the Eleventh Century Gregorian Reform Programme,’ Journal of Eccles. History 13 (1962) 21–38. Discusses in particular the relationship of Dictatus Papae to the collection in 74 titles.Google Scholar
Gilmore, M. P., ‘The Jurisprudence of Humanism,’ Traditio 17 (1961) 493–501. A bibliographical study, esp. of Guido Kisch's work on Erasmus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gransden, A., ‘Some Late Thirteenth-Century Records of an Ecclesiastical Court in the Archdeaconry of Sudbury,’ BIHR 32 (1959) 62–9.Google Scholar
Greenslade, S. L., ‘Sede Vacante Procedure in the Early Church,’ JTS n.s. 12 (1961) 210–26 (with special consideration of material from the Register of Gregory the Great).Google Scholar
Hazard, G. C., ‘The Early Evolution of the Common Law Writs: A Sketch,’ AJLH 6 (1962) 114–22.Google Scholar
Heimpel, H., ‘Reformatio Sigismundi, Priesterehe und Bernhard von Chartres,’ Deutsches Archiv für die Erforschung des Mittelalters 17 (1961) 526–37 (discusses inter al. legislation of Pope Callixtus II on celibacy).Google Scholar
Herde, P., Beiträge zum päpstlichen Kanzlei– und Urkundenwesen im 13. Jahrhundert (Münchener historische Studien, Abt. Geschichtliche Hilfswissenschaften 1; Kallmünz 1961), xiii, 259 pp. Presents important new material on the personnel of the Chancery under Innocent IV (pp. 1–48); on categories of papal letters (50–64); repression of forgery (72-4); on proctors (with special reference to Bavarian recipients, 88–100); on chancery procedure (101-76) esp. delegation, correctors, and the audientia litterarum contradictarum. Edition of documents (186-97).Google Scholar
Hermesdorf, B. H. D., ‘De ontmoeting van kanoniek en inheems recht in de Noordelijke Nederlanden gedurende de 14de en 15de eeuw,’ TRG 30 (1962) 141–208. Discusses points of contact with canon law in the Dutch law books, treatises, and city statutes of the later Middle Ages, esp. concerning oaths, degradation, reverence for sacred places, asylum, the position of women and clerics in public life.Google Scholar
Hipola Aleixandre, F., La técnica jurídica de San Isidoro de Sevilla (Valencia 1961).Google Scholar
Infantes Florido, J. A., ‘San Agustín y la cuota de libre disposición.’ Anuariode historia del derecho español 30 (1960) 89–112. Discusses the texts of St. Augustine on the pars animae (but the author knows of the late E. F. Bruck's fundamental Kirchenväter und soziales Erbrecht only through a book review; cf. p. 91n.) and their ‘auténtica’(?) interpretation by Gratian, C. 13 q. 2 dict. a.c. 8, p.c. 8.Google Scholar
Ius Romanum Medii Aevi auspice Collegio antiqui iuris studiis provehendis (Société d'histoire des droits de l'Antiquité), Pars I 1a-d (Milan 1961), 146 pp. Teil I: Praemittenda; Die Zeit vor Irnerius: (1) Praemittenda. (a) De Visscher, F., ‘Préface,’ pp. 7–9; (b) ‘Einteilung des Gesamtwerkes (Stand vom September 1960),’ 11–24; (c) Feenstra, R. et Rossi, G., ‘Index adbreviationum et de modo citandi fontes,’ 25–108, 109-18; (d) Genzmer, E., ‘Einleitung,’ 119-46. — See also Trifone, , infra .Google Scholar
Janini, J., ‘Cuarantésima visigoda y carnes tollendas,’ Anthologica annua 9 (1961) 11–83. Critical edition and discussion of pertinent texts of councils from Zaragoza (380) to 8 Toledo (653).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, H., ‘“Causa debendi” und “causa petendi” bei Glanvill sowie im römischen und kanonischen Recht seiner Zeit,’ Traditio 17 (1961) 107–62. New evidence for the influence of the droit savant (obligations and actions) on ‘Glanvill's’ treatise, with a critique of Woodbine's choice of MSS for the edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, F. S.J., ‘Zur politischen Lehre der früh– und hochmittelalterlichen Kirche,’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 305–19. Continues the discussion, in reply to H. Barion's review (ibid. 46 [1960] 484–501) of the author's criticism, in Saggi storici intorno al Papato (Miscellanea historiae pontificiae 21; Rome 1959) 117-69, of Ullmann's Growth of Papal Government. Google Scholar
Kiefner, H., ‘Semel malus semper praesumitur esse malus,’ ZRG Rom. Abt. 78 (1961) 308–54. A study of reg. iur. 8 of the Liber Sextus, its antecedents in the Accursian gloss, its character as a praesumptio iuris, and the later restrictions of the rule. (However, the author disregards the classical commentaries of Johannes Andreae, Guido de Baysio, and Johannes Monachus on Boniface VIII's Regulae iuris; for the latter he still accepts the long-disproved authorship of Dinus.) Google Scholar
Kuttner, S., Harmony from Dissonance: An Interpretation of Medieval Canon Law (Wimmer Lecture 10; Archabbey Press, Latrobe, Pa. 1960 [publ. 1961]). 64 pp.Google Scholar
Kuttner, S., ‘Pope Lucius III and the Bigamous Archbishop of Palermo,’ Med. Studies Gwynn 409–53. On the interpretation of D. 34 c. 18 (Capitula Mart. Bracar. c. 43) by the early decretists and decretalists; the problem of papal dispensation from irregularity ex bigamia; the canonistic legend of the dispensation granted by Lucius III (the ‘archbishop’ was probably the Chancellor Matthew of Salerno). Appendix of texts, pp. 439-53.Google Scholar
Kuttner, S., ‘Notes on Manuscripts, I: Summae decretorum, II: Decretal collections, III: Vincentius Hispanus, IV: Varia,’ this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17.533-42.Google Scholar
Lattin, H. P., The Letters of Gerbert, with his Papal Privileges as Sylvester II translated with an introduction (Columbia University Records of Civilization 60; New York 1961), pp. x, 412.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C., ‘Rote Romaine’ (concluded), DDC 7 (1961) 769–71. Important list of manuscript collections of decisions; bibliography. (Cf. this Bulletin for 1960, Trad. 16.567).Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C., ‘Sicard de Crémone,’ DDC 7.1008–11.Google Scholar
Legendre, P., ‘E. M. Meijers et la romanistique mediévale,’ TRG 29 (1961) 331–42. An appreciation of the work of the late lamented scholar as collected in vol. III of his Etudes d'histoire du droit (ed. Feenstra, and Fischer, , 1959); abundant fresh information on MSS in the footnotes. Important lists of sigla of authors (13th and 14th cent.) of the schools of Italy and France, from over 60 MSS: pp. 336ff.Google Scholar
Maffei, D., ‘Cino da Pistoia e il “Constitutum Constantini”,’ Annali della Università di Macerata 24 (1961) 95–115. Discusses a notice by Egidius de Bellamera according to which Cino before his death changed his opinion (as expressed in the Lect. Codicis) on the inalienability of the iura imperii: since we do not know the final shape of Cino's Lect. Dig. veteris, Bellamera may well be correct.Google Scholar
Maisonneuve, H., ‘La morale d'après les conciles des Xe et XIe siècles,’ Mélanges de science religieuse 18 (1961) 1–46.Google Scholar
Marcos Rodríguez, F., ‘Tres manuscritos del siglo XII con colecciones canónicas,’ Analecta sacra Tarraconensia 32 (1959) 35–54. Describes three Salamanca University MSS: 2644 (Caesaraugustana), 2348 (Polycarpus), 2018 (unidentified collection). Also mentions MS 2678, a compilation of decretals in five books. (On this, cf. Annual Report, p. 450 supra, for García's forthcoming study.) Google Scholar
Marti, B. M., ‘Gomez versus the Spanish College at Bologna,’ Didascaliae: Studies in Honor of Anselm M. Albareda ed. Prete, S. (New York 1961) 293–319. Edits and comments upon a set of documents, copied in three MSS of 15th-cent. material on dictamen, from the acta of a lawsuit brought in 1402 against the Collegio di Spagna by a Portuguese student of canon law, Gometius Pellagii; the dossier includes four consilia: by Rodulphus de Lamandis, prior of S. Giovanni in Monte (pp. 307-10), Antonius de Butrio (311-13), Bartholomaeus de Saliceto (314-15), and Petrus de Ancharano (statement of concurrence only, 315).Google Scholar
Martínez Diez, G. S.J., ‘El Epítome Hispánico: una collección canónica española del siglo VII, estudio y texto crítico, I: Estudio,’ Miscelanea Comillas 36 (1961) 5–90. These prolegomena for the critical edition include: cap. 1. La investigación histórica y el Epítome Hisp. (pp. 15ff.); 2. Transmisión manuscrita (22ff.: 11 MSS); 3. Análisis y descripción (36ff.: councils 38ff., decretals 49ff.); 4 Fuentes (55ff.), 5. Autor (67ff.: probably a bishop of the province of Braga, early 7th cent.); 6. Difusión y influjo (73ff.). Also discusses carons and decretals in Spain during the first six centuries (c. 7, pp. 77ff.), the versio Gallica of the councils (app. I, 87f.), Mansi's excerpts from MS Lucca 490 (app. II, 89f.).Google Scholar
Martinis, L., ‘The Career and Library of a 15th-Century Lawyer (Bartolus of Sassoferrato's Grandson),’ ASD 3/4 (1959/60) 323–32. The grandson is Sallustio di Guglielmo, c. 1373–1461; his library catalogue: pp. 330ff.Google Scholar
May, G., ‘Bemerkungen zu der Frage der Diffamation und der Irregularität der öffentlichen Büsser,’ Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 12 (1961) 252–68.Google Scholar
May, G., ‘Die Anfänge der Infamie im kanonischen Recht,’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 77–94. From the imperial constitutions of 372 to Ps. Isid.Google Scholar
Monahan a Regina Carmeli, F., ‘De delegabilitate potestatis ordinis,’ Ephemerides Carmeliticae 12 (1961) 249–89. Discusses also writers of the classical period, e.g., 250-59, 268-74.Google Scholar
Morghen, R., ‘Ricerche sulla formazione del Registro di Gregorio VII,’ ASD 3/4 (1959/60) 35–63. Returns, against Borino's thesis, to a conception of the Dictatus Papae as the program of a canonical collection still to be compiled from old and new texts; concludes that Reg. Vat. 2 is an ‘original register,’ not of the Chancery, but composed from selected original documents under the direction of Gregory between 1076 and 1081, as a documentary of his pontificate, and intended to have ‘valore canonico.’ Google Scholar
Moynihan, J. M., Papal Immunity and Liability in the Writings of the Medieval Canonists (Analecta Gregoriana 120; Rome 1961), vii, 151 pp. The main part of the study, leaning heavily on the work of Ullmann, Ryan, and Tierney, deals with the ‘nisi a fide devius’ clause in D. 40 c. 6. List of MSS and edited texts used: pp. 145, 146-8.Google Scholar
Nörr, K. W., ‘Notes on Manuscripts, V: Der Apparat des Laurentius zur Compilatio III; VI: Summa Posnaniensis,’ this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17. 542–4.Google Scholar
Paradisi, B., ‘La Scuola di Orléans: un'epoca nuova nel pensiero giuridico (a proposito del volume di A. [sic] M. Meijers, Etudes d'histoire du droit 3/1,’ Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 26 (1960) 347–62. Discusses the role of Roman law in France, within a political and constitutional framework different from that of Italy; develops Meijers' observations on the relatively limited importance of dialectic in the method of the Orleanese writers, with whom practical problems of exegesis are treated much less ‘scholastically’ than points of pure theory.Google Scholar
da Rosa Pereira, I., ‘Dois manuscritos alcobacenses da Primera Compilação,’ offprint from Lumen, April-May 1962 (23 pp.). Analyzes in full MSS Alcob. 173 (304) and 381 (305). Notes on the textual shape (omissions, additions, etc.) of Comp. I in these MSS: pp. 4–9, 13–20; glosses: pp. 20–23.Google Scholar
da Rosa Pereira, I., ‘Silvestre Godinho: um canonista português,’ offprint from Lumen, July 1962 (8 pp.). Biography, archival material, including Silvester's will; publication of some glosses on Comp. III from Alcob. MS 381 (305): pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
Pilati, G., Chiesa e Stato nei primi quindici secoli: Profilo dello sviluppo della teoria attraverso le fonti e la bibliografia (Rome-Paris etc. 1961), 415 pp. (On Gratian: p. 185; decretists: 199–203; other canonists: 207-60).Google Scholar
Riesenberg, P., ‘The Consilia Literature: a Prospectus,’ Manuscripta 6 (1962) 3–22. A general survey; does not consider the problems discussed in G. Rossi's fundamental Consilium sapientis. Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M. J., ‘Innocent IV and the Element of Fiction in Juristic Personalities,’ The Jurist 22 (1962) 287–318.Google Scholar
Rossi, G.: see Ius Romanum Medii Aevi.Google Scholar
Sambin, P., ‘Libri di Bonincontro de’ Boattieri, canonista bolognese († 1380) e di Antonio David, vescovo di Fano († 1416),' Rivista di storia della Chiesa in Italia 15 (1961) 197–215.Google Scholar
Sawicki, J., Statuty synodalne krakowskie biskupa Jana Konarskiego z 1509 roku (Concilia Poloniae: Zródla i studia krytyczne 1; Lublin 1961), with added French title page (Les statuts synodaux du diocèse de Krakow promulgués par l'évêque Jan Konarski en 1509) and German summary (pp. 60–61). A somewhat revised reprint of the study and text first issued under the same title in another series (Polish Academy: Studia i Materialy do historii ustawodawstwa synodalnego w Polsce 8; Krakow 1945). The synod of 13 July 1509 and the Rubricella for the diocese for the year 1511 (liturgical calendar) are edited from the broadside of 1509/10 which survives in a single copy at Cracow. A general study of the Cracow synods 1459–1547 precedes. (Note: vol. 2–9 of the Concilia Poloniae appeared between 1948 and 1957.) Google Scholar
Skånland, V., ‘Supplerende og kritiske bemerkningen til Eirik Vandvik: Latinske dokument til Norsk historie fram til år 1204,’ Historisk Tidsskrift 41 (1961–2) 129–46. Discussing Vandvik's publication of Latin documents bearing on the history of Norway before 1204, the author deals with some letters of Gregory VII and Eugene III; in particular he publishes addenda on some papal letters from early decretal collections: Alexander III, ‘Ex diligenti’ and ‘Ad aures’ (JL-; cf. Holtzmann, , ‘Krone und Kirche in Norwegen,’ Beilagen No. 1 and 3); JL 16552, 17639, 17671 (from Coll. Seguntina), edition of JL 16572 (to Oslo), 17612 (to Bergen).Google Scholar
Sheehy, M. P., ‘English Law in Medieval Ireland: Two illustrative documents,’ Archivium Hibernicum 23 (1960) 167–75. Publishes two petitions of the Irish clergy concerning ecclesiastical and royal jurisdiction, from B. M. Cotton MS Aug. ii fol. 104a (pp. 171-4) and Lambeth MS 619 fol. 206a (174-5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprandel, R., ‘Ivo von Chartres und die moderne Doktrin “Nulla poena sine lege”,’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 95–108. Analyzes patristic texts in Ivo Pan. 4.113, 114; 2.168; C. 32 q. 4 c. 3; and especially Ivo's dictum ‘Illae causae a iudicibus ecclesiasticis minime audiantur quae legibus non continentur,’ formulated after L. Visig. 2.1.13 (p. 99).Google Scholar
Stehkämper, H., ‘Ein Utrechter kanonistischer Traktat über Kriegsrecht (1419/1420),’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 196–265. Discusses and edits the Latin text and its Middle Low German translation — both in the Staatsarchiv Münster, collection of the Verein für Geschichte und Altertumskunde Westfalens, MS 324 — of an opinion written during the wars of 1417–22 for the city councillors of Utrecht by a group of Dominicans, on the canonistic principles of just war and conduct of war. Sources (chiefly Johannes Lector of Freiburg): pp. 216ff.; analysis of doctrine: 222ff.; edition: 249-65.Google Scholar
Szentirmai, A., ‘Die ungarische Diozesansynode im Spätmittelalter,’ ZRG Kan. Abt. 47 (1961) 266–92.Google Scholar
Teetor, P. R., ‘England's Earliest Treatise on the Law Merchant: an Essay on the Lex Mercatoria from The Little Red Book of Bristol (circa 1280 A.D.),’ AJLH 6 (1962) 178–210. Translation of the text: pp. 181–210.Google Scholar
Tierney, B., ‘“Tria quippe distinguit iudicia…”: A Note on Innocent III's Decretal Per Venerabilem,’ Speculum 37 (1962) 48–59. Analyzes Innocent's teaching on temporal Jurisdiction in the letter Potthast 1794 (X 4.17.13) and its interpretation by the glossators of the Compp. antt. and the Gregorian Decretals.Google Scholar
Trifone, R., Il diritto romano comune e diritti particolari nell'Italia meridionale (Ius Romanum Medii Aevi, Pars V 2d; Milan 1962). 56 pp.Google Scholar
Ullmann, W., ‘Eugenius IV, Cardinal Kemp, and Archbishop Chichele,’ Med. Studies Gwynn 359–83. Discusses the papal decree Non mediocri (to be dated c. 1440, as against the usual 1439) on the office and precedence of cardinals, its background, and doctrinal importance in the matter of jurisdiction as distinct from ordo. Google Scholar
Zacour, N. P., ‘Stephanus Hugoneti and his “Apparatus” on the Clementines,’ this Bulletin for 1961, Trad. 17.527–30.Google Scholar
Zumkeller, A., ‘Zur handschriftlichen Überlieferung und ursprünglichen Textgestalt der Augustinusregel (aus dem Nachlass des P. Dr. Winfried Hümpfner),’ Augustiniana 11 (1961) 425–33. Notes on new MSS and new readings which the late W. Hümpfner planned to use for a revision of his edition of the Rule.Google Scholar