Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:24:57.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Berthold of Zwiefalten's Chronicle: Reconstructed and Edited with an Introduction and Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Luitpold Wallach*
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Harpur College, Endicott, N.Y.

Extract

To Barbara, Sally, Henrik

The saying of Terentianus Maurus, habent sua fata libelli, may well be applied to the Latin text here edited. Out of my studies of Berthold of Zwiefalten's Chronicle grew my thesis for the Ph. D. degree of the University of Tübingen, Studien zur Chronik Bertholds von Zwiefalten, published in Studien und Mitteilungen zur Geschichte des Benediktinerordens 51 (1933) 83–101 and 183–195. The subsequent work on the Chronicle and the relevant studies that appeared between 1933 and 1938 are described below in the Introduction. The political developments in Germany prevented me from bringing out the planned edition of the reconstructed Chronicle, and compelled me to be satisfied with the presentation in the Revue Bénédictine 50 (1938) 141–145, of the synopsis of my reconstruction with the first edition of 1852 in the Monumenta Germaniae Historica. In 1946–47 my fortune led me to Cornell University where the work in its present form was written. When preparing in 1953 the MS for the printer, I noticed in Wattenbach-Levison, Deutschlands Geschichtsquellen im Mittelalter I (Weimar 1952) 29 note 106, the edition by Erich König and Karl Otto Müller, Die Zwiefalter Chroniken Ortliebs und Bertholds (Schwäbische Chroniken der Stauferzeit 2; Stuttgart-Berlin 1941). Upon inquiry the W. Kohlhammer Verlag at Stuttgart informed me that their stock of the book had been destroyed during the war. Professor Dr. P. Gehring of the University Library at Tübingen then kindly mailed the surviving library copy of the book to Ithaca, New York, in January 1955. The examination of both Chronicles plainly showed me,

a) that the text of Berthold's Chronicle edited by Erich König is basically the text of my first reconstruction, the MS of which I had turned over to E. König before I left Germany in August 1939, and

b) that the Introduction to Berthold by Karl Otto Müller, also his re-evaluation of Ortlieb, often follow in word and contents my Tübingen Ph. D. Thesis of 1932.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Zeller, J., ‘Geschichte des Klosters (Zwiefalten),’ in Beschreibung des Oberamts Münsingen (2nd ed. Stuttgart 1912) 803–861; Brackmann, A. Germania Pontificia II 1 (Berlin 1923) 218–222; also Weller, K., Württembergische Kirchengeschichte bis zum Ende der Stauferzeit (Stuttgart 1936).Google Scholar

2 Cf. Wattenbach, W., Deutschlands Geschichtsquellen im Mittelalter II (6th ed. Berlin 1894) 394–5.Google Scholar

3 See Wallach, L., ‘Zur Chronik Ortliebs von Zwiefalten,’ Revue Bénédictine 49 (1937) 200203.Google Scholar

4 Die Kopffische Kompilation der Zwiefalter Chroniken Ortliebs und Bertholds,’ Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskünde [=NA] 5 (1880) 452456.Google Scholar

5 NA 42 (1921) 317. Google Scholar

6 Studien und Mitteilungen zur Geschichte des Benediktiner-Ordens 51 (1933) 83–101, 183–195; see Stenzel, K., in Jahresberichte für deutsche Geschichte 9–10 (1933–34; Leipzig 1936) 642 no. 58; Bulletin d'histoire Bénédictine 4 (1932–41) no. 1131; also Revue Bénédictine 55 (1943–44) 161. Cf. NA 50 (1935) 690; Württembergische Vierteljahrhefte 40 (1934) 131; for the fragmentary text transmission see below, Section VIII B under Cr.Google Scholar

7 Cf. Weber, D., Die Wüstungen in Württemberg (Stuttgart 1927); Weller, K., Besiedlungsgeschichte Württembergs vom 3. bis 13. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart 1938).Google Scholar

8 See ch. 28; on infantulus cf. Hofmeister, A., ‘Puer, iuvenis, senex,’ Papsttum und Kaisertum. Paul Kehr dargebracht (München 1926) 289ff.Google Scholar

9 See ch. 11; also Brackmann, A., Germ. Pont. II 1 (1923) 221 no. 6.Google Scholar

10 Compare the study by Hildegard Güssefeld, Der Kirchenschatz des Klosters Zwiefalten (typewritten Thesis Würzburg 1924). Google Scholar

11 Cf. ch. 10: ‘Bertoldus pictor’; also mentioned in Necrologium Zwif., MGH Necrologia 1.243, xv Kal. Ian. Google Scholar

12 Ch. 47; Hauck, A., Kirchengeschichte Deutschlands III (3rd and 4th edd. 1906) 930 n.3, wrongly identifies ‘Bertoldus pictor’ (see n.11) with the author of the chronicle.Google Scholar

13 Ch. 51, where he calls himself tertius abbas, not counting the nine weeks’ incumbency of Bilgrinus (see Annales Zwifaltenses ad a. 1139). In the list of Zwief. abbots he is the fourth; cf. MGH SS 13.333. Google Scholar

14 Ulrich, the second abbot died on March 19, 1139 (MGH Necr. 1. 247; Ann. Zwif. ad a.; ‘Bilgrinus septem ebdomadas presidit’; Berthold was therefore not elected before the end of May, 1139. Google Scholar

15 Cf. Zwiefalten Translatio manus s. Stephani, MGH SS 10.93; Ann. Zwif. 1141. Google Scholar

16 See n. 17. Google Scholar

17 Zwiefalten Translatio duarum virginum, MGH SS 10.92, Bibliotheca hagiographica (ed. Bollandiani Bruxellis, Socii 1898ff.) 8446; cf. Levison, W., ‘Das Werden der Ursulalegende,’ Bonner Jahrbücher 132 (1927) 35ff.; Coens, M., ‘Les vierges martyres de Cologne,’ Analecta Bollandiana 47 (1929) 89ff.; Guy de Tervarent, ‘Légendes et reliques. Le cas des Onze Mille Vierges,’ Le Moyen Age 30 (1929) 17ff.Google Scholar

18 Cf. Ann. Zwif. ad a. 1143. Google Scholar

19 See Vita et Passio s. Ernesti ed. van Ortroy, Fr., Acta Sanctorum Novembris III (Bruxellis 1910) 614–617; independently edited also by Brehm, K., Schwäbisches Archiv 29 (1911) 97ff.Google Scholar

20 Ann. Zwif. ad a. 1146–47.Google Scholar

21 Ibid. 1152.Google Scholar

22 Ibid. 1158.Google Scholar

23 Ibid. 1169; concerning his day of death cf. MGH Necr. 1.252, xii Kal. Maii.Google Scholar

24 See Sulger, Arsenius, Annales Imperialis Monasterii Zwifaltensis (Augustae Vindelicorum 1698) 137; May, J., Die heilige Hildegard von Bingen (1911)366ff.Google Scholar

25 PL 197.370–71, epist. 140. Google Scholar

26 Ibid. 284–5. epist. 65; Pitra, J. B., Analecta Sacra 8 (Paris 1891) epist. 123.Google Scholar

27 Pitra, , op. cit. epist. 155.Google Scholar

28 Ibid. epist. 61.Google Scholar

29 PL 197.371 epist. 141. Google Scholar

30 Pitra, , op. cit. epist. 128.Google Scholar

31 See Sulger, Arsenius, op. cit. (n. 24 supra) 130; Pitra, epist. 49; Fr. Haug, ‘Der Briefwechsel der hl. Hildegard mit der schwäbischen Geistlichkeit,’ Rottenburger Zeitschrift für praktische Theologie 13 (1929–30) 54; Haug, ‘Epistulae Hildegardis, S. secundum codicem Stuttgartensem,’ Revue Bénédictine 43 (1931), does not offer new material for our problem. Hans Liebeschütz, Das allegorische Weltbild der hl. Hildegard von Bingen (Studien der Bibliothek Warburg 15; 1930)5, assumes with other scholars that one of the contemporary witnesses for Hildegard is to be found in the Ann. Zwif. ad a. 1142; but this passage in the Annales is written by a hand of the fourteenth century; cf. Eugen Schneider, Die Zwiefalter Annalen und Ortliebs Chronik (Stuttgart 1889) 12 note 5.Google Scholar

32 Redlich, O., Die Privaturkunden des Mittelalters (1911) 91f.Google Scholar

33 Polheim, K., Die lateinische Reimprosa (Berlin 1925) 396.Google Scholar

34 Ibid. 70ff.; Meyer, W. von Speyer, ‘Die rhythmische lateinische Prosa,’ Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur mittellateinischen Rhythmik II (Berlin 1905) 236ff.Google Scholar

35 Manitius, M., Geschichte II (München 1923) 16.Google Scholar

36 This MS contains also excerpts from the twelfth-century transmission of Leo of Naples’ version J2 of the Historia dePreliis of Alexander the Great; see Wallach, L., ‘Quellenkritische Studien zum hebräischen Josippon,’ Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 82 (1938) 192–3.Google Scholar

37 For other MSS of Hermann's martyrology see Quentin, Henri, Les martyrologes historiques du moyen âge (Paris 1908) 680.Google Scholar

38 Cf. Ottonis et Rahewini Gesta Imp Friderici I. (3rd ed. rec. Waitz, G. cur de Simson, B., SS. rer. Germ. 1912).Google Scholar

39 See Bernhardi, W., Konrad III. (Leipzig 1883) 596, 628, 651.Google Scholar

40 Ed. van Ortroy, Fr., AS Novembris III (Bruxellis 1910) 616.Google Scholar

41 Otfonis Episc. Frising. Chron. ed. Hofmeister, A. (2nd ed. SS. rer. Germ. 1912) xix.Google Scholar

42 Brackmann, , Germ. Pont. II 1 (1923) 103, also 136 no. 47, 147 no. 4.Google Scholar

43 Burchardi Praepositi Urspergensis Chronicon ed. Holder-Egger, O. and de Simson, B. (2nd ed. SS. rer. Germ. 1916).Google Scholar

44 Edited with the older necrology in MGH Necr. 1. 240–263. Google Scholar

45 Cf. Hans Heuermann, Die Hausmachtpolitik der Staufer von Herzog Friedrich I. bis König Konrad III. (Leipzig 1939). Google Scholar

46 Bernhardi, W., Lothar von Supplinburg (Leipzig 1879) 556.Google Scholar

47 Bernhardi, W., op. cit. 417–20.Google Scholar

48 Cf. Albrecht Keller, Die Schwaben in der Geschichte des Volkhumors (Stuttgart 1907). Google Scholar

49 Cf. Mauser, O., Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik auf vergleichender Grundlage (München 1933) 19-20, 22–28; Karstien, C., Historische deutsche Grammatik (Heidelberg 1939) 36. I share the view that a MHG Schriftsprache never existed; cf. also Fr. Maurer in Germanische Philologie: Festschrift für Otto Behaghel (Heidelberg 1934) 227.Google Scholar

50 Cf. furthermore Schwarz, E., Deutsche Namenkunde I-II (Göttingen 1949–50), and Bach, A., Deutsche Namenkunde I-III (Heidelberg 1953).Google Scholar

51 See Bach, A., ‘Deutsche Siedlungsnamen in genetisch-wortgeograph. Betrachtung,’ Festschrift für Otto Behaghel (Heidelberg 1924) 233 ff.; Will, W., ‘Deutsche Namenforschung,’ Germanische Philologie; Festschrift für Otto Behaghel (Heidelberg 1934) 137–154.Google Scholar

52 Cf. Lexer, M., Mittelhochdeutsches Handwörterbuch I (1872) 28 and III (1878) 1223.Google Scholar

53 Cf. Bohnenberger, K. ‘Die -heim und -weiler Namen Alemanniens mit einem Anhang über die -ingen Namen, ‘Württembergische Vierteljahrshefte 31 (1925); Bach, A., ‘Die Ortsnamen auf -heim im Südwesten des deutschen Sprachgebiets,’ Wörter und Sachen 8 (1923) 142ff.Google Scholar

54 See Helbok, A., ‘Die deutschen Weiler-Orte,’ Mitteilungen des österreichischen Instituts für Geschichtsforschung Erg. Bd. 11 (1929) 129–39.Google Scholar

55 Cf. Bohnenberger, K., Die Ortsnamen Württembergs in ihrer Bedeutung für die Siedlungsgeschichte (2nd ed. 1927); also Weller, K., op. cit.; n. 7 supra).Google Scholar

56 See Spruner-Menke, , Hand-Atlas für die Geschichte des Mittelalters (3rd ed. Gotha 1880) map 35: Swabia.Google Scholar

57 Ed. Selmer, C., Middle High German Translations of the Regula Sancti Benedicti (Cambridge Mass. 1933) 13-47; cf. K. O. Müller, ‘Eine Handschrift der Benedicti, Regula S. aus der Frühzeit des Klosters Zwiefalten,’ Historisches Jahrbuch der Görresgesellschaft 60 (1940) 246–49.Google Scholar

58 Schulz, Marie, Die Lehre von der historischen Methode bei den Geschichtsschreibern des Mittelalters (1909) 84ff.; also my remarks in Revue Bénédictine 49 (1937) 201.Google Scholar

59 MGH SS 10.70. Google Scholar

1 cf. 1. Cor. 15.45Google Scholar

2 cf. Reg. Ben. 58.43; cf. etiam Aug., De peccatorum meritis et remissione 1.13.17 (CSEL 60.17.12)Google Scholar

3 cf. Reg. Ben. 33.2; Rom. 5.19Google Scholar

4 cf. Aug. De pecc. mer. et rem. 1.2.2 (CSEL 60.4.3) cum legitur hoc deum primo homini etiam post peccatum increpando et damnando dixisse: terra es et in terram ibis? cf. Gen. 3.19; Eccle. 3.20Google Scholar

5 cf. Rom. 5.12Google Scholar

6 Iob. 14.1; cf. lob 21.26Google Scholar

7 cf. Rom. 5.18; 1. Cor. 15.22; Aug. De pecc. mer. 1.4.4 (CSEL 60.5.25); ib. 1.13.16 (CSEL 60.16.16)Google Scholar

8 cf. Reg. Ben. ed. Linderbauer, p. 105Google Scholar

9 Eccle. 3.20Google Scholar

10 cf. Iob 34.15; Ps. 103.29Google Scholar

11 Eccle. 2.16Google Scholar

12 cf. Gen. 41.30Google Scholar

18 cf. Reg. Ben. 7.125Google Scholar

14 Esth. 9.20Google Scholar

15 cf. Ps. 36.20Google Scholar

a universis W b-b et — originem ante Quapropter m c maiorem W d veluti WGoogle Scholar

16 Hieron. ep. 29.1 (CSEL 54.232); cf. Revue Bénédictine 50 (1938) 144Google Scholar

17 Isid. etym. 1.3.5; cf. Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 194Google Scholar

18 cf. Act. 28.21Google Scholar

19 cf. Ps. 43.2Google Scholar

20 1. Ioh. 1.3Google Scholar

21 Dan. 2.35Google Scholar

22 cf. 1. Reg. 30.19Google Scholar

23 cf. Iob 42.6; 2. Pet. 2.6Google Scholar

24 Ioh. 4.38Google Scholar

25 cf. Matth. 20.2Google Scholar

26 cf. Eccle. 2.19Google Scholar

27 Matth. 20.12Google Scholar

28 cf. Matth. 20.4–6Google Scholar

29 Iudith 6.17Google Scholar

30 cf. Act. 12.5Google Scholar

31 cf. 1. Cor. 3.6e norint K f loquitur W g qu. videlicet et a qui quibus W h quoniam m 1 maiores W k pecunia (sic) F1 1 ex W m quantove m n cineresue W o et W p usus sit r. W q qui KGoogle Scholar

1 1 Ier. 1.10 2 Sap. 8.1 3 2. Cor. 6.14 4 cf. 1. Par. 5.10Google Scholar

1 a libellus W b C. et L. K c al Mumpelgart ut in margine membranae scripturn erat Cr d spiritus s. K e que usque oblata om. K f sustinendos F1 g Uwilunhalda W h om. K i alium F1 k extollit m 1 Zwiful. K m om. KGoogle Scholar

1 5 Ios. 21.9 6 cf. Iudith 8.7 7 cf. Lev. 1.4–5Google Scholar

2 1 cf. Ios. 9.13 2 Ps. 103.15 3 Ps. 41.5 vel 46.2 4 1. Cor. 3.6 5 Ios. 15.19; cf. Iud. 1.15Google Scholar

1 n Hulstetin K o Honhiluwe W p Ista usque singula om. KGoogle Scholar

2 a C. usque tradidit om. K b vicino K c quorum ista sunt vocabula add. K d Omnia igitur K e p. usque dicimus om. K f 21 mansus F1Google Scholar

3 1 cf. 2. Reg. 19.43 2 cf. Lev. 19.20 3 Esth. 9.6 4 cf. Tob. 1.14Google Scholar

2 g K Lindimarus W Lindimorgus F1 h quas statim subiungimus K 1 hic usque devitamus om. KGoogle Scholar

3 a L. usque Tarodingin om. K b d. quoque K c persolventem KWF1 d om. m e om. m f octo contra KGoogle Scholar

5 Tob. 11.5 Google Scholar

g per accidens W h apud usque universum om. K i Dedit usque mansum om. K k quatuor m l appellatas KW m beneficilis W beneficiis F1 n D. usque traditis om. K o constitutas Cr p Podmicum F1Google Scholar

3 6 Lev. 6.20 7 cf. Iudith 8.7Google Scholar

4 1 cf. 1. Par. 5.2 2 cf. 1. Tim. 5.15 3 Apoc. 11.7 4 cf. Ioh. 19.30 5 cf. Apoc. 12.11 6 cf. 2. Pet. 1.21 7 Dan. 11.15; Iud. 6.2 8 cf. Matth. 10.22 9 cf. Luc. 23.7.11Google Scholar

3 q Hic usque praedium om. KGoogle Scholar

4 a Sexto omn. codd. Quarto potius; mortuus est enim Couno a. 1092 secundum Ortliebum (1.14) et Annales Zwifaltenses. b anno 1095 F1 vide app. crit. a c hic K d p. suas m e amicos F1 f Liutoldus WGoogle Scholar

5 1 Eccle. 45.1 2 1. Tim. 2.8 3 cf. Hebr. 2.5 4 cf. 1. Reg. 16.12 5cf. Sap. 2.18 6 cf. 2. Reg. 20.8 7 Phili. 2.6 8 Luc. 19.21 9 cf. Num. 31.53 10 Ios. 13.1 11 2. Reg. 4.4. 12 Ioh. 1.39Google Scholar

5 a H. usque interdixit om. K b om. k c om. K d vix et aegre queant F1 e annuo Cr f Tunc KGoogle Scholar

c 1 cf. 2. Reg. 1.23 2 cf. Phili. 4.3Google Scholar

7 1 3. Reg. 8.50 2 4. Reg. 23.15 3 cf. Matth. 10.22Google Scholar

8 1 Luc. 22.31 2 Apoc. 12.12 3 cf. Iac. 5.5 4 cf. Dan. 13.9 5 Ps. 21.14 6 cf. Ps. 72.9; etiam Bonitho, Liber ad Amicum, MGH Libelli de Lite 1.606.27; Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 109Google Scholar

7 a Enabirrach F1 Emburach Or b Saltzbouch F1 c iuxta F1 d om. KGoogle Scholar

8 a rege m b namque m c haec W d abscisus m e iudicio KGoogle Scholar

7 3. Reg. 13.33 8 Ez. 9.6 9 cf. Frutolfi et Ekkehardi Chron., glossa in cod. Stuttgart. hist. f. 411, MGH SS 6.202; etiam Bernoldi Chron. ad a. 1076, MGH SS 5.431 sq.; Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 187 sq. 10 cf. Eccli. 50.13 11 Bonitho, , op. cit. 614.14 12 cf. 1. Ioh. 3.12 13 2. Tim. 2.26 14 cf. Luc. 3.8 16 cf. 2. Macc. 10.12 16 cf. 2. Macc. 5.7–8 17 cf. Is. 21.15 18 cf. Ps. 118.13 18a Ps. 100.3 19 cf. Codex Udalricus ed. Jaffé, Ph.; p. 144; Ottonis Frising. Chron. 6.306 (ed. Hofmeister, A. 1912); Paulus Bernried. Vita Gregorii VII ch. 110 (ed. Watterich, I.540): Dilexi iustitiam et odivi iniquitatem, propterea morior in exilio (cf. Ps. 44.8 = Hebr. 1.9)Google Scholar

f -que m g itaque F1 Cr h F1 celebrante KWB1 i pridie m k deest m l attemptatur W m om. K n expiraret m o quomodo m Google Scholar

20 Gen. 8.8 21 Galat. 2.9 22 Rom. 11.4 23 Iudith 1.11 24 Luc. 19.14 25 Ex. 9.12 26 cf. 2. Macc. 12.41 27 cf. 3. Reg. 5.3 28 Matth. 10.21, 36 29 2. Par. 25.20 30 1. Reg. 10.26 31 cf. Luc. 14.33 32 cf. Rom. 12.1 33 cf. Willehelmi Constitutiones Hirsaugienses, prol. PL 150.927B; etiam Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 190 Google Scholar

p F1 om. al. codd. q truncidantur F1 r sine num. K s isti d. K t hoc versiculo et hac coronae inscriptione: Petra dedit Petro, Petrus diadema Rudolpho. Hi ambo F1 cf. Ottonis et Rahewini Gesta Friderici I Imp. ed. de Simson, B. (1912) 23 u an. illa et generationibus F1 n. et generationibus WGoogle Scholar

8 34 cf. Act. 23.10 35 cf. Tob. 3.14 36 cf. Reg. Ben. I.23.14 37 Ps. 76.11 38 cf. Ier. 25.9 39 Is. 10.5 40 cf. 1. Reg. 10.26 41 cf. 2. Macc. 5.7–8 42 Apoc. 18.6Google Scholar

9 1 cf. Ioh. 11.30 2 cf. Prov. 27.27 3 Iud. 14.8 4 Num. 23.10Google Scholar

8 v illum F1 w verum usque captus om. KGoogle Scholar

9 a per … libras F1 b etiam K c quoniam KGoogle Scholar

10 a M. usque decoravit om. KGoogle Scholar

10 1 cf. Marc. 5.23 2 cf. Iud. 19.9 3 Vide Ortlieb 1.20 4 cf. Gen. 7.13 5 cf. 2. Macc. 4.28Google Scholar

10 b honorem F1 c Bernhardus m d item usque consecrata om. K e C. usque depinxit om. K f vide c g Sacellum K capellam m h A. usque condita om. K i constrinximus F1 k monachus F1 l factus F1 m Griesingen F1 n ducissa K o om, KGoogle Scholar

10 6 cf. Luc. 1.53Google Scholar

11 1 cf. Translatio manus s. Stephani (MGH SS 10.90 sq.); Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 99Google Scholar

11 a alium m b NB. quod abbas fuerit huius monasterii Zwif. qui hunc librum scripsit glossa sine dubio marginalis in codd. WF1 c a. tamen p. m excepto K d capsulam F1Google Scholar

2 cf. Iob 19.12 3 cf. Ex. 12.4 4 Is. 60.13 5 Ps. 2.2 6 1. Macc. 4.57 7 cf. Hebr. 11.9 Google Scholar

e Vide glossam sine dubio marginalem in codd. WF1 in Studien und Mitteilungen OSB 51 (1933) 91 f Deduwinum (uulgo Dietwein) F1 g legatum add. manu recent. W h K Sexibrana F1 i cappa KW k samet m l KGoogle Scholar

12 1 cf. Greg. mor. (PL 75.511 A) ex huius vitae naufragio nudus evasi 2 cf. Greg. dial. 3.16 (ed. Moricca, U., Fonti per la Storia d'Italia 57.177) in devexo montis latere 3 cf. Ier. 50.28 4 cf. Reg. Ben. 58.28 5 cf. Hebr. 12.22Google Scholar

12 a de Tetingin add. B2 b monachus factus m c 4 F1 d Stubucha KW e pernatans unum mansum W f deest W g Neuwenhusen ducit ad K h Ningen KGoogle Scholar

6 Is. 10.5 7Deut. 31.27 7a Iudae Epist. 11 8 1. Ioh. 2.19 9 Luc. 9.62 10 cf. Matth. 26.37 11 Matth. 14.23 12 Tob. 14.17 13 cf. Geg XL hom. in ev. (PL 76.1155C) aetas quae decrepita … dicitur Google Scholar

i Conradi Cr k Ottmot F1 l in villa que Otmot vel Cretunbach appellatur dedit plus quam unum mansum K m Eiselin scribit Diutwin B2 Ditwin W Diettwin F1 Drutwin K n 9 m o 10 Cr p quatuor F1 q quia W r KCr Eiselin legit LX B2 s apud m t-t et usque partis deest m u hodie Blietshausen F1Google Scholar

12 14 cf. 2. Reg. 14.25 15 cf. 2. Macc. 7.42 16 Osee 2.6 17 cf. Ex. 9.20 18 cf. Luc. 5.6 19 Matth. 6.30Google Scholar

14 1 cf. Ps. 104.19 2 cf. Gen. 8.21Google Scholar

12 v om. m w per inimicos m x K Bertoldus Cr y finis codd, WF1Google Scholar

13 a om. K b huicce KGoogle Scholar

15 1 Matth. 21.34 2 Gen. 27.36 3 cf. 2. Reg. 30.15 4 cf. Act. 25.5 5 Deut. 19.6Google Scholar

15 6 cf. Gen. 26.7 7 Ps. 37.10Google Scholar

16 1 cf. Prov. 6.11 2 1. Reg. 4.18Google Scholar

17 1 Ps. 118.127 2 cf. Matth. 27.33Google Scholar

16 a Eiselin legit duo B2Google Scholar

17 4 Ez. 28.4 4 cf. Act. 27.19 5 cf. 3. Reg. 6.32Google Scholar

18 1 cf. Act. 24.5 2 cf. Luc. 10.39 3 cf. Gen. 27.37 4 cf. Iud. 13.5 5 Deut. 31.11 6 Gen. 1.2Google Scholar

17 a Zatzolfo K b sacellano KGoogle Scholar

18 a Hadewic vero soror eius prius … K b deest K c quam usque vidi om. KGoogle Scholar

18 7 Luc. 10.42Google Scholar

20 1 Sap. 4.11Google Scholar

19 a empta K b Gerolt B2Google Scholar

20 2 cf. Gen. 45.18Google Scholar

21 1 Phili. 2.15 2 Gen. 16.12 3 cf. Is. 65.25 4 cf. 4. Reg. 11.14 5 cf. Ex. 2.22 6 cf. Gen. 31.27Google Scholar

21 a Cono K Oudalricus B23 b regali B2Google Scholar

22 1 1. Par. 12.28 2 cf. Is. 66.3 3 Gen. 25.27 4 Iud. 14.8 5 Matth. 12.45 (Luc. 11.26)Google Scholar

23 1 cf. Iud. 20.37 2 cf. Act. 20.30 3 cf. Iudith 7.9 4 Ps. 64.4Google Scholar

23 5 cf. 1. Reg. 4.18 6 cf. Matth. 20.4 ff.Google Scholar

25 1 Matth. 25.13 2 Iud. 5.22 3 1. Reg. 4.18 4 Iob 16.14Google Scholar

24 a B2 disertissimus K b Bertholdus in marg. supra KGoogle Scholar

26 1 cf. Ioh. 1.47Google Scholar

27 1 Iob 1.1Google Scholar

28 1 cf. 3. Reg. 3.20 2 cf. Dan. 3.21 3 cf. 1. Reg. 1.24 4 Zach. 3.2 5 cf. Gen. 12.10Google Scholar

27 a-a om. KGoogle Scholar

28 a lacuna KB2 (= Eiselin)Google Scholar

28 6 cf. Is. 22.3Google Scholar

29 1 Epist. 97.3 (CSEL 55.184) … brevitati studens 2 cf. Iob 14.18 3 cf. 1. Reg. 1.23 4 cf. 2. Macc. 9.4 5 Gen. 22.9 6 cf. 3. Reg. 3.20 7 cf. Gen. 1.15 8 Greg. XL hom. in ev. 1.1 (PL 76.1078C)Google Scholar

29 9 Apoc. 12.1 10 cf. Iud. 20.25 11 cf. 2. Macc. 12.16 12 cf. Ex. 24.10 13 cf. Eccle. 12.2 14 cf. Tob. 2.19 15 cf. Iudith 14.15Google Scholar

29 a potius XXVIIGoogle Scholar

30 a-a Cr om. KB23Google Scholar

31 1 cf. Greg. dial. 4.6 (ed. Moricca, U., Fonti per la Storia d'Italia 57. 239.7) cottidianis miraculis coruscantGoogle Scholar

30 b XX Cr c-c om. KGoogle Scholar

32 1 Thren. 3.15 2 cf. Rom. 2.16 3 Rufinus, , hist. eccl. 2.5.5 ed. Mommsen, Th. (Leipzig 1903) 119.5–6; cf. etiam Gildae Sapientis, De excidio et conquestu Britanniae ch. 20 MGH Auctores Antiquissimi, Chronica Minora 3, ed. Mommsen, Th. p. 36.10; Defensor, Liber Scintillarum 66 PL 88.701B 4 cf. Gen. 45.18 5 1. Cor. 15.3Google Scholar

33 1 cf. Esth. 14.1 2 cf. Amos 9.13 (Joel 3.18) 3 Iosue 14.4Google Scholar

34 1 cf. Ier. 10.3 2 Ps. 54.5 3 Ez. 13.5Google Scholar

35 1 cf. Ps. 117.22; etiam 1. Pet. 2.4Google Scholar

36 1 cf. Iob 36.3 2 Ps. 89.15Google Scholar

34 a prebuit KGoogle Scholar

35 a deest KGoogle Scholar

36 3 Lev. 1.17 4 cf. 2. Macc. 10.36 5 cf. Ez. 12.12 6 Lev. 1.17 7 cf. Gen. 37.8 8 cf. Nahum 2.3Google Scholar

36 a-b in marg. K c paucis interiectis diebus alius electus add. KGoogle Scholar

37 a repudiatio K b Hoc KGoogle Scholar

38 1 2. Cor. 7.5. 2 cf. 2. Macc. 11.12 3 cf. Ioh. 18.11Google Scholar

39 1 cf. Eccli. 3.27… in illo peribitGoogle Scholar

38 a Quomodo igne et ferro ubique uastabamur litteris capit. KGoogle Scholar

39 2 cf. Gen. 33.4Google Scholar

39 a que MSSGoogle Scholar

40 1 cf. Is. 5.27 2 cf. Greg. mor., ex huius vitae naufragio nudus evasi PL 75.511A; vide etiam c. 12 test. 1 3 cf. Luc. 21.1 4 Apoc. 14.13 5 Iob 1.8Google Scholar

40 a om. K b Paraitinhulwe K c Obrehestetin Eiselin B2 d deest KGoogle Scholar

41 a quem Eiselin suo fol. 35 cum Roudolfo de Hohdorf laico confundit B2 b om. K c quinquagintis K d Hi duo dimidii mansus ad O. etc. in margine KGoogle Scholar

41 1 Luc. 2.19 2 cf. Luc. 15.17 3 cf. Matth. 3.7Google Scholar

41 e K Eiselin scribit Ulmariorum B2 f cum aliter auferre ea non possent B2 g om. B2 h quali nobis dederunt add. B2 i Walichstetin B2Google Scholar

41 4 Iob 3.25Google Scholar

42 1 cf. Iob 8.12 2 cf. 2. Macc. 9.21 3 cf. Gen. 43.29 4 Eccle. 9.10Google Scholar

41 k Eiselin corrupte vocat Bernhardum B2 1 unum CrGoogle Scholar

42 a sacellum K b B2 Cr tres KGoogle Scholar

42 5 cf. Ez. 37.11Google Scholar

43 1 Ez. 2.4 2 Luc. 18.2 3 Matth. 3.9; cf. etiam Luc. 3.8 4 Iob 23.16 5 Lev. 6.17 6 cf. 1. Par. 29.17 7 Matth. 26.38Google Scholar

42 c quem Eiselin Bernhardum vocat B2 d Grunigin B2 e Eiselin intermittit illud in villa Uplumare et ibidem B2Google Scholar

43 8 cf. Ps. 2.2 9cf. Tob. 8.9Google Scholar

44 1 Ioh. 18.11 2 Phili 2.21 3 cf. Tractatus Garsiae Tholetani canonici de Albino et Rufino ed. Sackur, E. MGH Libelli de Lite 2.424 n.1; etiam Paul Lehmann, Die Parodie im Mittelalter (München 1922) 44 n.1, 54ff.Google Scholar

44 a vis auri in margine K b manda Cr c Romenae K Eiselin habet Romae B2Google Scholar

46 1 cf. Matth. 20.2ff.Google Scholar

47 1 Ps. 70.18Google Scholar

45 b scil. coenobiiGoogle Scholar

46 a dicit K b Eiselin habet in eodem vico B2 c Eiselin Leungruti ego Leimgrubi legendum puto B2 d kGoogle Scholar

47 a In capitalibus de thesauro aecclesiae et quantus fuerit KGoogle Scholar

2 cf. Ier. 10.5 3 cf. Cant. 7.1 Google Scholar

b om . KGoogle Scholar

47 4 cf. Is. 56.8; (cf. etiam Ortlieb, MGH SS 10.88.46) 5 cf. 1. Par. 21.3 6 cf. Matth. 25.21 7 1. Cor. 3.17 8 Iob 40.18 9 4. Reg. 20.17 10 Matth. 18.7; 26.24Google Scholar

47 c om. KGoogle Scholar

48 a Diepemindingen K b supra lineam K c Sletinbuch CrGoogle Scholar

49 1 Ioh. 1.47 2 Ps. 23.4 3 cf. Matth. 20.16Google Scholar

48 d Eiselin vero Scachwison B2Google Scholar

49 a Hoc habent ambo exemplaria (i.e. EK), licet antea (vide c. 12) dictum sit de 4 mansus B2 b Bernhardus B2 c MSS d Eiselin Sundirinha B2Google Scholar

50 1 cf. Luc. 10.20 2 cf. Matth. 5.19 3 cf. Deut. 8.9 4 cf. Gen. 43.29 5 cf. Luc. 10.20Google Scholar

49 e 22 B2Google Scholar

50 a om. KGoogle Scholar

51 1 cf. Ex. 35.24. 2 cf. 1. Cor. 13.11Google Scholar

52 1 cf. Gen. 45.19Google Scholar

52 a in margine supra lineam K b om, KGoogle Scholar

52 2 cf. Tit. 3.14Google Scholar

53 1 cf. Deut. 28.57 2 cf. Greg. dial. 4.16 ed. Moricca, p. 252.7 sed tamen rebus pauperem vitam ducebantGoogle Scholar

52 c-d om. KGoogle Scholar

53 a tanta p. et n. B2 b quod B2Google Scholar

533 cf. 2. Reg. 13.10 4 cf. Dan. 1.16 5 cf. Iob 30.7 6 Matth. 12.1 7 cf. Thren. 1.11Google Scholar