Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-5rzhg Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2021-12-06T00:53:55.067Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Mismanagement and Ecclesiastical Visitation of English Monasteries in the Early-Fourteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Edwin N. Gorsuch*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University

Extract

A most pernicious problem contributing to the economic woes of English monasteries in the early-fourteenth century was mismanagement. This condition was usually, if not almost universally, present and derived in part from the fact that the administrators of religious houses, especially the small ones, were not well trained for the complexities of their tasks. The official records of the royal chancery abound with notices that monasteries suffered from this malady, and the entries in these records follow a pattern, repeating time and time again a variety of standard charges. Having perhaps endured internal dissension that had contributed to the economic difficulty, monasteries became impoverished by indiscreet rule, their goods were wasted, and they experienced mismanagement. In addition, the documents assert that these troubled monasteries suffered from indebtedness, that lax discipline prevailed, and that lands of religious corporations were alienated illegally. Finally, the entries maintain that the ill-advised sale of corodies, and the unwarranted grants of pensions contributed to a depressed monastic economy. To illustrate these observations upon defective monastic administration, reference to specific examples is needed.

Type
Miscellany
Copyright
Copyright © Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Calendar of Patent Rolls… [cited hereafter as CPR] 1327–1330, p. 136.

2 CPR 1327–1330, p. 384.

3 CPR 1327–1330, p. 391.

4 CPR 1327–1330, p. 525.

5 CPR 1334–1338, p. 211.

6 CPR 1345–1348, p. 391.

7 CPR 1348–1350, pp. 175–176.

8 CPR 1330–1334, p. 579.

9 CPR 1340–1343, p. 444.

10 See Knowles, David, The Religious Orders in England I (Cambridge 1948) 5563, for a discussion of monastic administration.

11 Brown, W. (ed.), Register of Thomas of Corbridge … I (Surtees Society Publ. 138; Durham and London 1925) 228230, 280–282. The prior of Newstead, together with two canons — two of the wiser monks in the house — and the prior of the house of Felley, were to constitute this committee for overseeing the finances of Newstead. No expenditures were to be undertaken without the knowledge, assent, counsel, and wishes of these individuals. After expenditures had been decided upon by the committee, the proposed action of the four was to be explained, discussed, and agreed to in the chapter of the monastery. Thus, all monks of the house were to have an opportunity to voice their opinions on how revenues were to be spent.

12 The obedientiary system assigned revenues from specified sources to the various monastic officials in such a way that each officer used the proceeds of enumerated properties in making the expenditures required by his position. The system was inefficient during the fourteenth century, when centralized direction and organization of both expenditures and receipts was needed so that the returns from resources could be maximized. Restrictive stipulations in endowments inhibited change from the system, for donors often indicated how the proceeds from their gifts were to be used.

13 Register of Thomas of Corbridge I 272–279. Indeed, the archbishop maintained that he had taken steps which would have made it easier for the prior to effect reform, for he had found during his visitation that there had been living in the priory certain brethren who were contumacious and refractory, and that he had sent them away to other houses in order that the prior might have a better chance to improve conditions at Thurgarton. There had been no such improvement, however, and the archbishop found it necessary to remove the prior, and gave orders to the convent to elect a more judicious monk to the position of leadership.

14 Thompson, A. H. (ed.), Register of William Greenfield … IV (Surtees Society Publ. 152; Durham and London 1938) 2831.

15 Page, William (ed.), The Victoria History of the County of York III (London 1913) 9798.

16 See Lucas, Henry S., ‘The Great European Famine of 1315, 1316, and 1317,Speculum 5 (1930) 343377.

CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Victoria History (cit. n. 15) III 97–98.

18 Goodman, A. W. (ed.), Registrum Henrici Woodlock … (Canterbury and York Series; Oxford 1934–1940) 316317.

19 See Knowles, , Religious Orders I 47 and 104, for comments on John of Rutherwyk, also Registrum Henrici Woodlock 533–537 (an entry under the year 1314).

1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mismanagement and Ecclesiastical Visitation of English Monasteries in the Early-Fourteenth Century
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Mismanagement and Ecclesiastical Visitation of English Monasteries in the Early-Fourteenth Century
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Mismanagement and Ecclesiastical Visitation of English Monasteries in the Early-Fourteenth Century
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *