Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T11:57:50.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the ways a scholarly journal maintains the appearance of impartiality—or, as some would have it, hides its prejudices behind a façade of impartiality—is by not publishing the work of its staff. Why, then, are there so many pages of this issue taken up by Milhous and Hume? Like several other articles in this issue and the next, this piece was part of the backlog accepted by my predecessor, Roger Herzel. Despite the awkwardness of the situation, he and I agreed that the account book format made for technical difficulties best left to me to deal with. Even with the time to experiment and the printing equipment under my own control I have not been able to solve all the typographical problems, but I am happy to have been able to spare Roger the nuisance presented by this very technical piece.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © American Society for Theatre Research 1990