Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:28:03.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor Flexibility and Employment Law: The New Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Brian Brookes
Brian Brookes*
Affiliation:
Law School, University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the past decade there has been a retreat from full employment and a fundamental change in the labour market away from physical production work and towards the service sector. There have been changes in the structure of industry and the workforce, and changes in arrangements under which work is performed. There is emerging a secondary or marginal labour market in which both full-time and casual, temporary and part-time workers are confronted with a situation where they are required to decide whether or not to enter work arrangements geared to the flexible organisational needs of the business enterprise rather than their own needs. Tensions between employer demands for flexibility, and for a largely unregulated use of the workforce, and employee concern to ensure job security and minimal protection in employment (including health and safety) means that employment law today has to respond to organizational relationships in determining whether or not to intervene between the parties to new work arrangements. The question is whether or not the principles of traditional employment law are flexible enough to become the legal framework of a technological society.

Type
Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , June 1990 , pp. 107 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Industrial Law Review (AILR).Google Scholar
Australian Law Review (ALR).Google Scholar
Brooks, A.S. (1988a) Guidebook to Australian Occupational Health and Safety Laws, CCH Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
Brooks, A.S. (1988b) “Myth and Muddle — An Examination of the Performance of Work”, University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol 11.Google Scholar
Brooks, B.T. (1985) “Aspects of Casual and Part-time Employment”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 27 (2), pp. 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth Law Reports (CLR).Google Scholar
Evans, A., Nedzyuski, R., Karlsson, B. (1985) Flexibility and Jobs — Myths and Realities, ETUI, Sydney.Google Scholar
Macken, J. (1984) “Changing Patterns of Work and Industrial Relations”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 26(3), pp. 264–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New South Wales Law Review (NSWLR).Google Scholar
Niland, J.R. (1989) Occupational Health and Safety, Transforming Industrial Relations in New South Wales, Discussion Paper No 2, DIRE, Sydney.Google Scholar
Queen's Bench Division (QBD).Google Scholar
Women's Bureau, Department of Employment, Education and Training (1989) New Brooms: Restructuring and Training Issues for Women in the Service Sector, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar