Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T13:00:39.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industry 4.0: a bibliometric analysis of social partners’ public messages in France and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2024

Beata Woźniak-Jęchorek
Affiliation:
Department of Macroeconomics and Development Research, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland
Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasińska*
Affiliation:
Department of Macroeconomics and Development Research, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland
Włodzimierz Lewoniewski
Affiliation:
Department of Information Systems, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland
Vassil Kirov
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Corresponding author: Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasińska; Email: katarzyna.wozniak-jasinska@ue.poznan.pl

Abstract

This paper investigates how interest groups in France and Germany communicate information about Industry 4.0 technologies and approaches. Specifically, this explanatory study employs cutting-edge big-data-type tools and machine-based automatic text processing to delve into the topics, arguments, and postulates related to Industry 4.0 strategies by trade unions and employers’ organisations. The goal is to determine which of these factors have been pivotal in shaping social dialogue in France and Germany. The findings reveal that social partners in both countries are involved in similar digitalisation-related initiatives and express predominantly favourable viewpoints regarding Industry 4.0 technologies. Key themes in the dialogues of both France and Germany centre around workers’ rights, working conditions, and skills training.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The University of New South Wales

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The online version of this article has been updated since original publication. A notice detailing the changes has also been published at https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2024.13

References

Acemoglu, D and Restrepo, P (2018) The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth factor shares and employment. American Economic Review 108, 14881542. https://doi.org/101257/aer20160696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D and Restrepo, P (2020) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy 128, 21882244. https://doi.org/101086/705716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, NB (2022) Role of AI in strategy formation and industrial relation building. BiLD Law Journal 7, 269277.Google Scholar
Apache ECharts (2022) Main page. Available at: https://echarts.apache.org/en/index.html.Google Scholar
Arntz, M, Zierahn, U and Gregory, T (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis OECD social employment and migration. OECD Working Paper No. 189. Available at: https://wecglobal.org/uploads/2019/07/2016_OECD_Risk-Automation-Jobs.pdf (accessed 20 March 2021).Google Scholar
Baiocco, S, Fernandez-Macías, E, Rani, U and Pesole, A (2022) The algorithmic management of work and its implications in different contexts. JRC Working Paper No. 2022/02. Available at: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/publications/algorithmic-management-work-and-its-implications-different-contexts_en (accessed 20 December 2022).Google Scholar
Belli, L, Davoli, L, Medioli, A, Marchini, PL and Ferrari, G (2019) Toward industry 4.0 with IoT: optimizing business processes in an evolving manufacturing factory. Frontiers in ICT 6, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2019.00017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, E, Fox-Skelly, J, Jenner, N, Larbey, R, Weitkamp, E and Winfiel, A (2020) The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Issues and Initiatives, Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, European Parliamentary Research Service. Brussels: European Union. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf (accessed 30 March 2021).Google Scholar
Bowles, J (2014) The Computerization of European Jobs: Bruegel Blog. Available at: https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/computerisation-european-jobs (accessed 30 March 2021).Google Scholar
Burgess, J and Connell, J (2020) New technology and work: exploring the challenges. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31, 310323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304620944296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canetta, L, Barni, A and Montini, E (2018) Development of a digitalization maturity model for the manufacturing sector. Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on engineering technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC), 17–20 June, Stuttgart, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonero, F, Offermanns, CJ and Weber, E (2023) The fall of the labor income share: the role of technological change and hiring frictions. Review of Economic Dynamics 49, 251268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CGT (2018) Les 32 heures. Available at: https://wwwcgtfr/dossiers/les-32-heures (accessed 30 March 2021).Google Scholar
Cobo, MJ, Jürgens, B, Herrero-Solano, V, Martínez, MA and Herrera-Viedma, E (2018) Industry 4.0: a perspective based on bibliometric analysis. Procedia Computer Science 139, 364371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corallo, A, Lazoi, M, Lezzi, M and Pontrandolfo, P (2021) Cybersecurity challenges for manufacturing systems 4.0: assessment of the business impact level. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 70, 37453765. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3084687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Freitas, AR Jr and Da Silva, VR (2017) The uberization of work and the legal regulation: the challenge of labor protection in semi-peripheral economies. Paper presented at the Labour Law Research Network Conference, 26 September, Toronto University.Google Scholar
Dengler, K and Matthes, B (2018) The impacts of digital transformation on the labor market: substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 137, 304316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digital Economy and Society Index European Union (DESI-EC) (2020) Available at: https://eceuropaeu/digital-single-market/en/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi.Google Scholar
Dribbusch, H and Birke, P (2019) Gewerkschaften in Deutschland. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Erhel, C (2021) Reforms and new challenges for work and employment in France: Social dialogue under pressure. In Vaughan-Whitehead, D, Ghellab, Y and de Bustillo Llorente, RM (eds), The New World of Work: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Partners and Labour Institutions, Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing, 188215.Google Scholar
Eurofound (2017) Addressing Digital Technological Change Through Social Dialogue. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2016/addressing-digital-and-technological-change-through-social-dialogue (accessed 10 January 2023).Google Scholar
Eurofound (2023) Eurofound glossary. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/glossary#S (accessed 10 January 2023).Google Scholar
European Commission (2022) Industry 5.0, a transformative vision for Europe, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Available at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/publications/all-publications/industry-50-transformative-vision-europe_en.Google Scholar
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) (2018) Digitalization and Workers’ Participation What Trade Unions Company Level Workers and Online Platform Workers in Europe Think. Report to the ETUC. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation. Available at: https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/publication/file/2018-09/Voss%20Report%20EN2.pdf (accessed 30 March 2021).Google Scholar
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2020) Industrie 4.0. Available at: https://wwwbmbfde/de/zukunftsprojekt-industrie-4-0-848html.Google Scholar
Findeisen, S, Constantinescu, C and Pokorni, B (2020) Enabling new forms of work organization on the shop floor through technology-driven innovation. In Ahram, T, Taiar, R, Langlois, K and Choplin, A (eds), Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications III. IHIET 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 1253. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_65.Google Scholar
Frey, CD and Osborne, MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114(1), 254280. https://doi.org/101016/jtechfore201608019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenau, LB, Sott, MK, Homrich, AJO, Kipper, LM, Al Abri, AA, Cardoso, TF, López-Robles, JR and Cobo, MJ (2020) 20 years of scientific evolution of cyber security: A science mapping. Paper presented at the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 10–12 March 2020, UAE, Dubai.Google Scholar
Future of Jobs Report 2023 (2023) World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/.Google Scholar
Gallie, D (2007) Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habrat, D (2020) Legal challenges of digitalization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing 51, 938942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haipeter, T (2020) Digitalisation unions and participation: the German case of ‘industry 4.0’. Industrial Relations Journal 51, 242260. https://doi.org/101111/irj12291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, T (2019) Determinants of decision-makers’ attitudes toward Industry 4.0 adaptation. Social Sciences 8, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Robotics (IFR) (2020) IFR presents World Robotics Report 2020. Available at: https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/record-2.7-million-robots-work-in-factories-around-the-globe.Google Scholar
Issaoui, Y, Khiat, A, Bahnasse, A and Ouajji, H (2019) Smart logistics: study of the application of blockchain technology. Procedia Computer Science 160, 266271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornelakis, A, Kirov, V and Thill, P (2022). The digitalisation of service work: a comparative study of restructuring of the banking sector in the United Kingdom and Luxembourg. European Journal of Industrial Relations 28, 253272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalikova, P, Polak, P and Rakowski, R (2020) The challenges of defining the term ‘Industry 4.0’. Society 57, 631636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapeyre, J (2018) The European Social Dialogue. The History of a Social Innovation (1985–2003). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. Available at: https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/Social-dialogue-Lapeyre-WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Légifrance (2018) (La Loi n° 2018-771 du 5 Septembre 2018/ LAW No. 2018-771 of 5 September 2018 on the freedom to choose one’s professional future (1) – Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr)Google Scholar
Lohmann, S (1995) Information, access, and contributions: a signaling model of lobbying. Public Choice 85, 267284. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettling, B (2015) Transformation numérique et vie au travail: Report to Myriam El Khomri, Minister of Labour. Available at: https://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_mettling_-transformation_numerique_vie_au_travail.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2017) White Paper — Work 4.0. Available at: https://wwwbmasde/EN/Services/Publications/a883-white-paperhtml (accessed 2 March 2021).Google Scholar
Ministry of Labour, Employment and Economic Inclusion (2018) Mesure d’audience de la représentativité syndicale 2017. Available at: https://code.travail.gouv.fr/fiche-ministere-travail/mesure-daudience-de-la-representativite-syndicale-2017.Google Scholar
Moniz, AB, Candeias, M and Boavida, N (2022) Changes in productivity and labour relations: artificial intelligence in the automotive sector in Portugal. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 22, 222244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, DC (2003) Public Choice III (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhuri, PK, Shukla, AK and Abraham, A (2019) Industry 4.0: a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 78, 218235. https://doi.org/101016/jengappai201811007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muňoz de Bustillo, R (2020) Digitalization and Social Dialogue: Challenges Opportunities and Responses: Preprint. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339948338_Digitalization_and_social_dialogue_challenges_opportunities_and_responses.Google Scholar
Nedelkoska, L and Quintini, G (2018) Automation skill use and training OECD social. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 202. Available at: https://proftest.in.ua/pub/docs/2e2f4eea-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Nimawat, D and Das Gidwani, B (2022) Challenges facing by manufacturing industries towards implementation of industry 4.0: an empirical research. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 16, 13711383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NLTK (2022) Natural Language Toolkit. Available at: https://www.nltk.org.Google Scholar
Ntoulas, A, Cho, J and Olston, C (2004) What’s new on the Web? The evolution of the Web from a search engine perspective. Paper presented at the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, 17–22 May, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2019) OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Parviainen, P, Tihinen, M, Kääriäinen, J and Teppola, S (2017) Tackling the digitalisation challenge: how to benefit from digitalisation in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management 5, 6377. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilc, M, Woźniak-Jęchorek, B, Woźniak, K and Piątek, D (2021) Industry 4.0 in the messages published by Employers and Trade Unions in France, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom. In Ratajczak-Mrozek, M and Marszałek, P (eds), Digitalization and Firm Performance. Examining the Strategic Impact. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 157188.Google Scholar
Schroeder, W, Greef, S and Schreiter, B (2017) Shaping Digitalisation Industry 4.0 – Work 4.0 – Regulation of the Platform Economy. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Schwab, K (2015) The Fourth Industrial Revolution Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/fourth-industrial-revolution (accessed 12 March 2021).Google Scholar
Scruton, R (2007) The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Political Thought (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senatori, I (2020) The European framework agreement on digitalisation: a whiter shade of pale? Italian Labour Law e-Journal 13, 159175.Google Scholar
Thomas, A (2013) Towards the managerialization of trade unions? Recent trends in France and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations 19, 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas-Llave, O, Weber, T and Avogaro, M (2020) Industrial relations Right to disconnect in the 27 EU Member States. Telework and ICT-based mobile work: flexible working in the digital age. Eurofound Report No. WPEF20019. Available at: https://cooperante.uni.lodz.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/wpef20019.pdf.Google Scholar
Wankhede, VA and Vinodh, S (2021) Analysis of barriers of cyber-physical system adoption in small and medium enterprises using interpretive ranking process. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 39, 23232353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, A, Schmidt, R, Jugel, D and Möhring, M (2016) Adaptive enterprise architecture for digital transformation, In Celesti, A and Leitner, P (eds), Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. Taormina: Springer International Publishing, 308319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar