Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T06:45:17.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do emigrants’ remittances cause Dutch disease? A developing countries case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Burçak Polat*
Affiliation:
Siirt University, Turkey
Antonio Rodríguez Andrés
Affiliation:
VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Burçak Polat, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Siirt University, Kezer Yerleşkesi Veysel Karani Mahallesi Üniversite Cad. No.1 56100, Merkez, Siirt, Turkey. Email: burcakpolat@siirt.edu.tr

Abstract

Although the positive socio-economic effects of remittances for recipient countries in the short term are unmistakable, inflows of remittances may at the same time exert adverse effects on the trade competitiveness of an economy, by appreciating the real exchange rate. This phenomenon is characterised as an instance of the ‘Dutch disease’ – the negative impact of windfall revenue inflows on the competitiveness of other tradable sectors and hence on overall economic growth. While the real effect of workers’ remittances on real exchange rates in a recipient economy is still a controversial issue, several studies have analysed evidence for the existence of the ‘Dutch disease’ phenomenon in various sets of countries. The main objective of this study is to examine whether remittance flows have had any adverse effect on the international trade competitiveness of a selected group of developing countries during the period from 1995 to 2014. Using a one-step system Generalised Method of Moments specification within a simultaneous equation approach, it shows that remittance flows depreciate the real exchange rate at their levels and that the lagged value of remittances create the Dutch disease for this country group. In addition, we confirm that while trade openness and world real interest rates contribute to a depreciation in real exchange rates, gross domestic product per capita and net Official Development Aid inflows tend to appreciate real exchange rates. A policy implication is that trade liberalisation policies that lower tariff rates on capital imports and new export-oriented incentive programmes should be accompanied by measures designed to prevent appreciation in the real exchange rate: steps in this direction such as recent macroeconomic and prudential capital flow management initiatives are briefly referenced.

Type
Post-crisis rebuilding: national perspectives
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, PA, Lartey, EKK, Mandelman, FS (2009) Remittances and the Dutch disease. Journal of International Economics 79(1): 102116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amuedo-Dorantes, C, Pozo, S (2004) Workers’ remittances and the real exchange rate: a paradox of gifts. World Development 32(8): 14071417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M, Bond, S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M, Bover, O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation error components model. Journal of Econometrics 68(1): 2951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athukorala, P, Rajapatirana, S (2003) Capital inflows and real exchange rate: a comparative study of Asia and Latin America. Departmental Working Papers no. 02, 13 July. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Barajas, A, Chami, R, Hakura, D, et al . (2010) Workers’ remittances and the equilibrium real exchange rate: theory and evidence. IMF, Working Paper no. WP10/287. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10287.pdf (accessed 7 January 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R, Bond, S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87(1): 115143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdet, Y, Falck, H (2006) Emigrants’ remittances and Dutch disease in Cape Verde. International Economic Journal 20(3): 267284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, MB, Rabbi, F (2014) Workers’ remittances and Dutch disease in Bangladesh. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 23(4): 455475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corden, WM, Neary, JP (1982) Booming sector and de-industrialization in small open economy. Economic Journal 92(368): 825848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S (1989) Real Exchange Rates, Devaluation and Adjustment: Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elbadawi, I, Kaltani, L, Schmidt-Hebbel, K (2008) Foreign aid, the real exchange rate, and economic growth in the aftermath of civil wars. The World Bank Academic Review 22(1): 113140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, J, Herrera, JC (2007) Emigrant Remittances and the Real Exchange Rate in Guatemala: An Adjustment-Cost Story. Guatemala City: Bank of Guatemala.Google Scholar
Ghosh, J (2018) A note on estimating income inequality across countries using PPP exchange rates. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 29(1): 2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moment estimators. Econometrica 50(4): 10291054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, GM, Holmes, MJ (2013) Remittances and the real effective exchange rate. Applied Economics 45(35): 49594970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2012) The liberalization and management of capital flows: an institutional view. International Monetary Fund, 14 November. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2012/111412.pdf (accessed 14 January 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issa, H, Ouattara, B (2004) Foreign aid flows and real exchange rate: evidence from Syria. School of Economics Discussion Paper, The University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
Ito, K (2017) Remittances and Dutch disease: evidence from the Republic of Moldova. International Economic Journal 31(3): 462469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo, A, Montiel, PJ (2006) Remittances and equilibrium real exchange rate in six Central American countries. IMF, Working Papers no. 03/250325. Williamstown, MA: Williams College, mimeo.Google Scholar
Keynes, JM (1929a) The German transfer problem. Economic Journal 39(153): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, JM (1929b) The reparation problem: a discussion. Rejoinder to B Ohlin. Economic Journal 39(154): 179183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lartey, E, Mandelman, F, Acosta, P (2012) Remittances, exchange rate regimes and Dutch disease: a panel data analysis. Review of International Economics 20(2): 377395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, H, Molina, L, Bussolo, M (2007) Remittances and the real exchange rate. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper no. 4213. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Martins, PMG (2013) Do large capital inflows hinder competitiveness? The Dutch disease in Ethiopia. Applied Economics 45(8): 10751088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munemo, J, Bandyopadhya, S, Basistha, A (2007) Foreign aid and export performance: a panel data analysis of developing countries. Working Paper no. 2007-023A. Available at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2007/2007-023.pdf (accessed 3 January 2019).Google Scholar
Nwachkwu, J (2008) Foreign capital inflows and the real exchange rate in Sub-Saharan Africa. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Social Science 2(3): 95106.Google Scholar
Nyoni, TS (1998) Foreign aid and economic performance in Tanzania. World Development 26(7): 12351240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, M, Rogoff, K (1996) Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ohlin, B (1929) The reparation problem: a discussion. Economic Journal 39(154): 172178.Google Scholar
Özcan, B (2011) The relationships between workers’ remittances and real exchange rate in developing countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 80: 8493.Google Scholar
Prakash, KA, Mala, A (2016) Is the Dutch disease effect valid in relation to remittances and the real exchange rate in Fiji? Journal of Asia Pacific Economy 21(4): 571577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quattara, B, Strobl, E (2003) Do aid inflows cause Dutch disease? A case study of the CFA Franc countries. The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series no. 0330. Available at: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/soss/economics/discussionpapers/EDP-0330.pdf (accessed 3 January 2019).Google Scholar
Rodrik, D (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 365412.Google Scholar
Roodman, D (2009) How to do xtabond 2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. The Stata Journal 9(1): 86136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, R, Dixon, R (2016) Workers’ remittances and the Dutch disease in South Asian countries. Applied Economic Letter 23(6): 407410.Google Scholar
Sackey, HA (2001) External aid inflows and the real exchange rate in Ghana. Research Paper no. 110. Available at: https://aercafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RP110.pdf (accessed 3 January 2019).Google Scholar
The Economist (1977) The Dutch disease. The Economist, 26 November, pp. 8283.Google Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2018) Remittances — an untapped engine for sustainable development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 8 May. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/remittances-engine-for-sustdev.html (accessed 3 January 2019).Google Scholar
Wahba, J (1998) The transmission of Dutch disease and labour migration. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 7(3): 355365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2018) Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$). The World Bank, 7 February. Available at: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/net-official-development-assistance-and-official-aid-received-current-us-2 (accessed 7 January 2019).Google Scholar
Żuk, P, Żuk, P (2017) Offshoring, labour migration and neo-liberalisation: nationalist responses and alternatives in Eastern Europe. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 29(1): 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar