Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T18:34:56.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AWAs and Individual Bargaining in the Era of WorkChoices: A Critical Evaluation Using Negotiation Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Peter Sheldon
Affiliation:
School of Organisation and Management, The University of New South Wales
Nancy Kohn
Affiliation:
School of Organisation and Management, The University of New South Wales

Abstract

The Howard government’s WorkChoices legislation appeared set to irremediably remake industrial relations in Australia by prioritising individual agreement making (through AWAs) at the expense of Australia’s traditional award systems based on collective bargaining. That government explicitly intended these changes to reduce labour market rewards to, and protections for, low paid and more vulnerable employees. Yet, it also deployed a rhetoric of individual choice in advocating these changes, promoting, in particular, a notion that individual bargaining and agreement making under WorkChoices empowered individual employees by opening opportunities for integrative (mutual gains) bargaining. This article asks what these changes really meant for bargaining between individual employee and employer. We analyse crucial elements of WorkChoices to highlight how its main structural mechanisms intensified employee bargaining weakness in individual bargaining. As well, we use negotiation theory, especially in relation to integrative bargaining, to evaluate the government’s own published advice to individual employees on how to bargain for an AWA. We find that the government explicitly sought to disempower employees through WorkChoices’ additional legal and institutional impediments and also through the concerted attempt at coaching employees to choose a losing path in their AWA negotiations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAP (2007) ‘Low-paid workers unhappy on AWAs: Study’, Sydney Morning Herald, 22 November, available http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Lowpaid-workers-unhappy-on-AWAs-study/2007/11/22/1195321924656.html [accessed 27 November 2007].Google Scholar
Abelson, R. (1981) ‘Psychological status of the script concept’, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 715729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) (2007) Guide to collective bargaining notifications, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, available http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/776299/fromItemId/776294 [accessed 11 November 2007].Google Scholar
AHRI (Australian Human Resources Institute) (2007) WorkChoices: Its impact Within Australian Workplaces. Survey Findings, 23 August, AHRI, Melbourne.Google Scholar
AIRC (Australian Industrial Relations Commission) (2007) Village Cinemas Australia and Carter, [2007] AIRCFB35, 15 January.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Thompson, L. (2004) ‘Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals’ positive affect shapes negotiations’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), pp. 125139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government (2005) WorkChoices: A Simpler, Fairer, National Workplace Relations System for Australia: Overview, available: https://www.workchoices.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/6F58B4CC-C8E5-4D53-B489-E0B78F844277/0/WorkChoices_Overview_Statement.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2007].Google Scholar
Australian Government Workplace Authority (2007) Tips for negotiating your workplace agreement, available: http://www.oea.gov.au/graphics.asp?showdoc=/employers/tips_for_negotiating_agreements.asp [accessed 11 November 2007].Google Scholar
Bacharach, S., Lawler, E. (1981) ‘Power and tactics in bargaining’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 32(2), pp. 219233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C., Cooper, R. (2006) ‘Between individualism and collectivism? Why employers choose non-union collective agreements’, Labour & Industry, 17(2), pp. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2007) Cambridge International Dictionary of Idioms, available http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=end*2+0&dict=I [accessed 20 November 2007].Google Scholar
Clegg, H. (1976) Trade Unions Under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons of Six Countries, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Considine, G., Buchanan, J. (2007) Workplace Industrial Relations on the Eve of WorkChoices: A report on a Survey of Employers in Queensland, NSW and Victoria, Workplace Research Centre, University of Sydney, September.Google Scholar
Cooney, S. (2006) ‘Command and control in the workplace: Agreement-making under work choices’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 147164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabscheck, B. (1993) ‘Industrial relations and theories of interest group regulation’, in Adams, R.J., Melz, N.M. (eds), Industrial Relations Theory: Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, IMLR Press/Rutgers University, Metuchen NJ, pp. 227254.Google Scholar
Dabscheck, B. (2006) ‘The contract regulation club’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, W., Taylor, P. (2007) ‘Role effects in negotiation: The one-down phenomenon’, Negotiation Journal, 23(3), pp. 307331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, C. (2006) ‘How low can you go? Minimum working conditions under Australia’s new labour laws’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 85126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. (1983) ‘Negotiating power’, American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), pp. 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W., Patton, B. (1999) Getting to Yes. 2nd ed., Random House, Great Britain.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. (1992) ‘The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations’, Psychological Review, 99(4), pp. 689723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. (1993) ‘Controlling other people’, American Psychologist, 48(6), pp. 621628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanders, A. (1975) Management and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations, Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
Forsyth, A., Sutherland, C. (2006) ‘From “unchartered seas” to “stormy waters”: How will trade unions fare under the Work Choices legislation?’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 215236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M., Palmer, G. (1997) Employment Relations: Industrial Relations and Human Resource Management in Australia 2nd ed. Macmillan, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Gioia, D., Poole, P. (1984) ‘Scripts in organizational behavior’, Academy of Management Review, 9(3), pp. 449459.Google Scholar
Hancock, K. J. (1985) Report of the Hancock Committee of Review: Australian Industrial Relations Law and Systems, Volume Two, Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hancock, K. J., Richardson, S. (2004) ‘Economic and social effects’, in Isaac, J., Macintyre, S. (eds), The New Province for Law and Order: 100 Years of Australian Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 139206.Google Scholar
Hockey, J. (2007) ‘Workplace relations amendment (a stronger safety net) bill 2007. Second reading speech’, Official Hansard. House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 29 May.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D., Anderson, C. (2003) ‘Power, approach and inhibition’, Psychological Review, 110(2), pp. 265284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keren, G. (2005) ‘Framing, intentions, and trust-choice incompatibility’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, pp. 238255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. E. (1990) Labour Economics: An Australian Perspective, Macmillan, Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, M., Creighton, B. (2004) ‘The law of conciliation and arbitration’, in Isaac, J., Macintyre, S. (eds), The New Province for Law and Order: 100 Years of Australian Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 98138.Google Scholar
ILO (International Labour Organisation) (2007) ‘Freedom of association cases’, Documents Available in ILOLEX for Australia, ILO, Geneva, available: http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/countrylist.pl?country=Australia [accessed 18 November 2007].Google Scholar
Lawler, E. (1992) ‘Power Processes in Bargaining’, Sociological Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. (2006) ‘Labour market institutions under threat? The case of working time’, Labour & Industry, 17(2), pp. 4156.Google Scholar
Levin, I., Schneider, S., Gaeth, G. (1998) ‘All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), pp. 149188.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Barry, B. (2006) Negotiation, 5th ed., McGraw Hill/Irwin, Boston.Google Scholar
Mannix, E. (1993) ‘Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, pp. 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Campbell, R., Barnes, A., Bicknell, E., Creighton, K., Fetter, J., Korman, S. (2005) ‘What’s going on with the “No Disadvantage Test”? An analysis of outcomes and processes under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth.)’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), pp. 393423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, M., Huber, V., Northcraft, G. (1987) ‘The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, pp. 228241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niland, J. (1978) Collective Bargaining and Compulsory Arbitration in Australia, University of New South Wales Press, Kensington.Google Scholar
Norris, K (1992) ‘The wages structure: Does arbitration make any difference?’ in King, J. E. (ed), Readings in Australian Labour Economics, Macmillan, Melbourne, pp. 105135.Google Scholar
Norris, K. (1993) The Economics of Australian Labour Markets, 3rd ed., Longman Cheshire, Melbourne.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K., Adams, A. (1999) ‘What novices think about negotiation: A content analysis of scripts’, Negotiation Journal, 15(2), pp. 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, M. (1954) Judges in Industry, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Polygenis, R. (2007) Economics update: Australian Q3 2007 CPI: Accelerating core inflation to force RBA’s hand, ANZ Bank, available http://www.anz.com.au/aus/Corporate/EcoComm/AustEconUpdates.asp [accessed 28 November 2007].Google Scholar
Polygenis, R., Rabinov, A., Yuen, W., Beaini, F., Rodrigues, M. (2007) Economic update: Australian GDP Q2 2007: Full steam ahead, ANZ Bank, available: http://www.anz.com.au/aus/Corporate/EcoComm/AustEconUpdates.asp [accessed 28 November 2007].Google Scholar
Riley, J., Sarina, T. (2006) ‘Industrial legislation in 2005’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(3), pp. 341356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, A. (2007) ‘Employers win wider power to sack’, Australian Financial Review, 16 January, Factiva Document AFNR000020070331e31g003e8 [accessed 27 November 2007].Google Scholar
Stewart, A., Williams, G. (2007) Work Choices: What the High Court Said, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Strauss, G. (1988) ‘Australian labor relations through American eyes’, Industrial Relations, 27(2), pp. 131148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L. (2005) The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Todd, P., Caspersz, D., Sutherland, M. (2006) ‘Employers’ choices in workplace regulation’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4), pp. 507522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ury, W. (1993) Getting Past No, (Revised Edition) Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
van Barneveld, K. (2006) ‘Australian workplace agreements under WorkChoices’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(2), pp. 165192.Google Scholar
Westcott, M., Baird, M., Cooper, R. (2006) ‘Re-working work: Dependency and choice in the employment relationship’, Labour & Industry, 17(1), pp. 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workforce (2006) 1541, 2 June.Google Scholar
Workforce (2007) 1612, 16 November.Google Scholar