Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T22:20:47.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embodied and Immersed Is the New Professional - Reconstruction, Replication and Re-enactment in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Edited by Sven Dupré, Anna Harris, Julia Kursell, Patricia Lulof, and Maartje Stols-Witlox. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020; 298 pp. €124.00 cloth, e-book available. - Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Edited by Andrea Ballestero and Brit Ross Winthereik. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2021; 301 pp. $104.95 cloth, $27.95 paper, e-book available. - Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research. Edited by Kat Jungnickel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2020; 264 pp.; illustrations. $35.00 cloth. - Theatre and Performance in the Neoliberal University: Responses to an Academy in Crisis. Edited by Kim Solga. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020; 262 pp.; illustrations. $160.00 cloth, $48.95 paper, e-book available.

Potential Alliances between Theatre and STS

Review products

Reconstruction, Replication and Re-enactment in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Edited by Sven Dupré, Anna Harris, Julia Kursell, Patricia Lulof, and Maartje Stols-Witlox. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020; 298 pp. €124.00 cloth, e-book available.
Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Edited by Andrea Ballestero and Brit Ross Winthereik. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2021; 301 pp. $104.95 cloth, $27.95 paper, e-book available.
Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research. Edited by Kat Jungnickel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2020; 264 pp.; illustrations. $35.00 cloth.

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

Yelena Gluzman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three recent anthologies in science and technology studies show how standards for scholarly professionalization are changing. Such changes may facilitate new alliances for theatre faculty plagued by old feuds and the increasingly neoliberal university.

Type
Concerning Books
Information
TDR , Volume 67 , Special Issue 2: Contemporary German Theatre , June 2023 , pp. 183 - 192
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barish, Jonas A. 1981. The Antitheatrical Prejudice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Rhonda, and Lutterbie, John. 2011. “Introduction: Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism’s Special Section on Cognitive Studies, Theatre, and Performance.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 25, 2:63–70. doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2011.0020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Marvin. 2011. “Inheriting the Wind: A Personal View of the Current Crisis in Theatre Higher Education in New York.” Theatre Survey 52, 1:117–23. doi.org/10.1017/S0040557411000093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Samuel Gerald, Durington, Matthew, and Gil, Harjant. 2017. “Multimodality: An Invitation.” American Anthropologist 119, 1:142–53. doi.org/10.1111/aman.12826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Downey, Gary Lee, and Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun. 2017. “Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th Ed., ed. Felt, Ulrike, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 223–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Finn, Patrick. 2015. “The Steamroller.” Canadian Theatre Review 161 (Winter):88–90. muse.jhu.edu/article/567448Google Scholar
Gluzman, Yelena. 2017. “Research as Theatre (RaT): Positioning Theatre at the Centre of PaR, and PaR at the Centre of the Academy.” In Performance as Research: Knowledge, Methods, Impact, ed. Arlander, Annette, Barton, Bruce, Dreyer-Lude, Melanie, and Spatz, Ben, 105–32. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Shannon. 2004. Professing Performance: Theatre in the Academy from Philology to Performativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConachie, Bruce. 2008. Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, Trevor. 2021. “Foreword.” In Routledge Handbook of Art, Science, and Technology Studies, ed. Hannah Star Rogers, Megan K. Halpern, Dehlia Hannah, and Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone, xxi–xxv. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riley, Shannon Rose, and Hunter, Lynette, eds. 2009. Mapping Landscapes for Performance as Research: Scholarly Acts and Creative Cartographies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roach, Joseph R. 1999. “Reconstructing Theatre/History.” Theatre Topics 9, 1:3–10. doi.org/10.1353/tt.1999.0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, Chris, Valérie Burri, Regula, and Dumit, Joseph. 2017. “Art, Design, and Performance.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th Ed., ed. Felt, Ulrike, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 139–68. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Watt Smith, Tiffany. 2016. “Eating Imaginary Raisins: Theatre’s Role in the Making of Mirror-Neurons.” Studies in Theatre and Performance 36, 1:17–20. doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar