Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T01:55:50.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Regimes and the Policing of Strikes in Two Gilded Age Cities: New York and Chicago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Richard Schneirov
Richard Schneirov*
Affiliation:
Indiana State University
*
Email: rschneirov@indy.rr.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1980s, scholars have argued that during the Gilded Age urban party machines incorporated working people through the use of patronage, informal provision of personal welfare, and limited concessions, thereby eliminating sustained labor and Socialist Party alternatives and keeping workers’ militancy and assertiveness confined to the workplace. That view is challenged by a historical comparison of the policing of labor disputes in New York and Chicago. In New York, organized workers were eliminated from the governing coalition of the Swallowtail-Kelly regime that succeeded the Tweed Ring, and police routinely used coercion to defeat strikes and intimidate Socialists. In Chicago, however, labor and Socialists were part of the governing coalition of the Carter Harrison regime, and the police took a hands-off stance in many strikes. This article explores the contrast in policing and the balance of social forces in the two cities and seeks to explain the differences by examining the political settlements that concluded Reconstruction, the ethnic makeup of each city's working classes, the different characteristics of each city's labor movement, and labor's ability to mount third-party challenges—all in the context of regional variations. It concludes that historians cannot assume that workers were incorporated into machines in this period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in American Political Development , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , October 2019 , pp. 258 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank James J. Connolly and Alan Lessoff for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

References

1. This account of the 1877 strikes, including numbers of dead and wounded, is based on a compilation of newspaper accounts in the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Inter-Ocean, Chicago Evening Journal, and the Chicago Times from July 21 to August 4, 1877.

2. Burrows, Edwin G. and Wallace, Mike, Gotham: A History of New York City to 1898 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999), 1110 (quote); 1035–37Google Scholar; Czitrom, Daniel, New York Exposed: The Gilded Age Police Scandal That Launched the Progressive Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), 61–62, 241Google Scholar; Gutman, Herbert G., “The Tompkins Square ‘Riot’ in New York City on January 13, 1874: A Re-examination of Its Causes and Its Aftermath,” Labor History 6 (Winter 1965): 47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Cohen, Nancy, The Reconstruction of American Liberalism, 1865–1914 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Richardson, Heather Cox, The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865–1901 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Quigly, David R., “‘The Proud Name of the “Citizen” Has Sunk’: Suffrage Restriction, Class Formation, and the Tilden Commission of 1877,” American Nineteenth Century 3 (Summer 2002): 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beckert, Sven, “Democracy and Its Discontents: Contesting Suffrage Rights in Gilded Age New York,” Past & Present 174 (February 2002): 116–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. For the standard view see Shefter, Martin, “Trade Unions and Political Machines: The Organization and Disorganization of the American Working Class in the Late Nineteenth Century,” in Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide R. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), 197–276Google Scholar. See also: Katznelson, Ira, City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981)Google Scholar; DiGaetano, Alan, “The Origins of Urban Political Machines in the United States: A Comparative Perspective,” Urban Affairs Quarterly 26 (March 1991): 324–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Fink, Leon, Workingmen's Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Voss, Kim, The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Oestreicher, Richard, “Urban Working-Class Political Behavior and Theories of American Electoral Politics, 1870–1940,” Journal of American History, 74 (March 1988): 1257–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Friedman, Gerald, “Dividing Labor: Urban Politics and Big-City Construction in Late-Nineteenth-Century America” in Strategic Factors in Nineteenth Century American Economic History: A Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel, eds. Goldin, Claudia and Rockoff, Hugh (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 447–64Google Scholar.

6. Christopher K. Ansell and Arthur L. Burris explore variations across cities in their study relating independent labor political action and the consolidation of central labor federations led by the American Federation of Labor to the formation of consolidated party machines. However, they are concerned not with explaining labor influence in politics and government but with variations in the ability to form machines. See Ansell, Christopher K. and Burris, Arthur L., “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development 11 (Spring 1997): 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. See, for example, Beckert, Sven, The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Quigly, David, Second Founding: New York City, Reconstruction, and the Making of American Democracy (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2004)Google Scholar.

8. For the view that labor's late nineteenth century trajectory “made” American exceptionalism, see Voss, The Making of American Exceptionalism and Forbath, William E., Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; for a survey see Gerber, Larry, “American Exceptionalism” in Encyclopedia of U.S. Labor and Working-Class History, ed. Arnesen, Eric (New York: Routledge, 2007), 1:67–71Google Scholar.

9. Richardson, James F., Urban Police in the United States (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1974), 159Google Scholar.

10. Tarr, Joel A., “The Evolution of the Urban Infrastructure in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries” in Perspectives on Urban Infrastructure, ed. Hanson, Royce (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984), 29–30Google Scholar.

11. Jentz, John B. and Schneirov, Richard, Chicago in the Age of Capital: Class, Politics, and Democracy during the Civil War and Reconstruction (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012), 132–33, 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bernstein, Iver, The New York City Draft Riots and Their Significance for American Society and Politics in the Age of the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 195–236Google Scholar; Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 929–50, 1003–1013.

12. For a deft portrait of the Tweed Ring and why it can be understood as an incipient regime—the term used by the author is “speculative political bubble”—see Broxmeyer, Jeffrey D., “The Boss's ‘Brains’: Political Capital, Democratic Commerce and the New York Tweed Ring, 1868–1871,” Journal of Historical Sociology 28, no. 3 (September 2015): 374–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Bernstein, New York Draft Riots, 195–236, esp. 214, 225, 230–32, 235–36; Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1008 (quote).

14. Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1009–11, quote at 1010.

15. Shefter, Martin, “The Emergence of the Political Machine: An Alternative View” in Theoretical Perspectives on Urban Politics, ed. Hawley, Ellis D. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1976), 25–26Google Scholar. Machines of this sort were not the norm in this period; most cities in the United States had factionalized rather than centralized machines, see Brown, M. Craig and Halaby, Charles N., “Machine Politics in America, 1870–1945,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 17 (Winter 1987), 587–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Teaford, Jon C., The Unheralded Triumph: City Government in America, 1870–1900 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984), 175–87Google Scholar.

16. Hammack, David C., Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century (New York: Russell Sage, 1982), 110Google Scholar; Beckert, Monied Metropolis, 130–32.

17. Shefter, “The Emergence of the Political Machine,” 27–30; Michael Allen Gordon, “Studies in Irish and Irish-American Thought and Behavior in Gilded Age New York City” (PhD diss., University of Rochester, 1977), 392–428; Beckert, Monied Metropolis; the same transition is examined nationally in Porter, Glenn and Livesay, Harold C., Merchants and Manufacturers: Studies in the Changing Structure of Nineteenth-Century Marketing (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971)Google Scholar and more recently by Livingston, James, Pragmatism and Political Economy of Cultural Revolution, 1850–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994), 24–48Google Scholar.

18. Gronowicz, Anthony, “Labor's Decline within New York City's Democratic Party from 1844 to 1884” in Immigration to New York, eds. Pencak, William, Berrol, Selma, and Miller, Randall M. (Philadelphia, PA: Balch Institute Press, 1991), 17 (quote), 18Google Scholar.

19. Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1012–13; Beckert, Monied Metropolis, 192–94; Montgomery, David, Beyond Equality: Labor and the Radical Republicans, 1862–1872(New York: Knopf, 1967), 323–34Google Scholar.

20. Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 13–14, 24–24, 27–33, 36–37, 38; Rima Lunin Schultz, “The Businessman's Role in Western Settlement: The Entrepreneurial Frontier, Chicago, 1833–1872” (unpublished PhD diss., Boston University, 1985), 65–97, 184–86; Einhorn, Robin L., Property Rules: Political Economy in Chicago, 1833–1872 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Cronon, William, Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West (New York: W. W. Norton, 1991), 322–24Google Scholar; Chicago Tribune, March 13, 1854.

21. Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 134–40.

22. Chicago Tribune, October 23, 1871 (quote); Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 137–39; 145–48.

23. Illinois Staats Zeitung, January 11 (quote) and January 15, 1872; Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 137–40; Einhorn, Property Rules, 238–39.

24. Chicago Tribune, March 18 and May 14, 1872, and September 10 and 13, 1972; Workingman's Advocate, March 23, 1872; Sawislak, Karen, Smoldering City: Chicagoans and the Great Fire (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), 84–85, 97–99Google Scholar.

25. Illinois Staats Zeitung, October 4 and 24, 1872; Chicago Tribune, October 11, 14, and 15, 1872; on the problem of corruption in the Gilded Age see Cohen, Reconstruction of Liberalism, 121.

26. Kazin, Michael, The Populist Persuasion: An American History (New York: Basic Books, 1995), chap. 2, quote at 29Google Scholar; Goebel, Thomas, “The Political Economy of American Populism from Jackson to the New Deal,” Studies in American Political Development 11 (Spring 1997): 109–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. Illinois Staats Zeitung, September 16, October 14, and November 5, 1873 (quote); Chicago Times, September 2, October 18, and October 20, 1873; for another view of urban populism, see Finegold, Kenneth, Experts and Politicians: Reform Challenges to Machine Politics in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), 13, 18–22, 127Google Scholar.

28. Chicago Tribune, December 22, 23 (quote), and 25, 1873; Workingman's Advocate, December 27, 1873–January 3, 1874; Illinois Staats Zeitung, December 23, 1873; on the Lassalleans see Schluter, Hermann, Die Internationale in America (Chicago: Deutsche Sprachengruppe der Sozialist. Partei der Ver. Sraaten, 1918), 310–12Google Scholar.

29. MacVeagh, Franklin, “Address, September 11, 1874,” in Addresses and Reports of the Citizens Association of Chicago, 1874–1876 (Chicago: Hazlitt and Reed, 1876), 4, 20Google Scholar; Chicago Tribune, July 26, 1874.

30. Pierce, Bessie Louise, A History of Chicago, Vol. 3: The Rise of a Modern City, 1871–1893 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957), 430Google Scholar; Swing, David, “A Plea for the Better Classes,” in Truths for To-Day: Second Series, ed. Swing, David (Chicago: Jensen, McClurg, 1876) 2:141–58Google Scholar.

31. Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 173, 175–83, 185; Beckert, Monied Metropolis, 218–24.

32. Robertson, Darrell M., The Chicago Revival, 1876: Society and Revivalism in a Nineteenth-Century City (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1989), 1, 20–42, 47–50, 86–109, 116–23, 139–41Google Scholar; Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 190–92.

33. Chicago Tribune, October 29, 1875; Chicago Tribune, March 12 and 24, April 5, 12, and 17, July 19 and 26, 1876; Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 188–90, 211–13, 237.

34. Chicago Tribune, April 3 and July 2, 1879; Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 221–222, 238–41.

35. Chicago Tribune, April 29, 1879.

36. Ibid., May 14, June 7, June 25, and October 28, 1879; Chicago Tribune, September 3, 1880; Chicago Tribune, September 8, 1885; Chicago Times, August 28, 1884; Pierce, A History of Chicago, 3:360; Teaford, Unheralded Triumph, 56, 60–64; Schmidt, Ernst, He Chose: The Other Was a Treadmill Thing, ed. and trans. Schmidt, Frederick R. (Santa Fe: Vegara, 1968), 122–23Google Scholar; Johnson, Claudius O., Carter Harrison I: A Political Leader (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928), 150Google Scholar.

37. For New York debt changes see Erie, Steven P., Rainbow's End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 45–51Google Scholar; for Chicago's see Bennett S. Stark, “Political Economy of State Public Finance: Illinois, 1830–1970” (PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1982), 75–81, 95, 103, 113; Tarr, “Evolution of Urban Infrastructure,” 30–31; Teaford, Unheralded Triumph, 54–60, 284–97; Studenski, Paul and Kross, Herman E., Financial History of the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952), 197–98Google Scholar; Yearley, C. K., The Money Machines: The Breakdown and Reform of Governmental and Party Finance in the North, 1860–1820 (New York: State University of. New York Press, 1970), 37–74Google Scholar.

38. Erie, Rainbow's End, 20–21, 27, 70; Chicago Tribune, October 29, 1882; Chicago Tribune, November 5, 1882; Chicago Tribune, March 30, 1885; Fox, Kenneth, Better City Government: Innovation in American Urban Politics, 1850–1937 (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1977), 12–20Google Scholar; Schneirov, Richard, Labor and Urban Politic: Class Conflict and the Origins of Modern Liberalism in Chicago, 1864–97 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998), 140–44Google Scholar; Jaher, Frederick Cople, The Urban Establishment: Upper Strata in Boston, New York, Charleston, Chicago, and Los Angeles (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982), 259–60; 503–504, 545–56Google Scholar.

39. For the first approach see Harring, Sidney L., Policing a Class Society: The Experience of American Cities, 1865–1915 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; for the second see Silver, Allan, “The Demand for Order in Civil Society: A Review of Some Themes in the History of Urban Crime, Police, and Riot,” in The Police: Six Sociological Essays, ed. Bordua, David J. (New York: Wiley, 1967), 1–24Google Scholar; for a review see Churchill, David C., “Rethinking the State Monopolisation Thesis: The Historiography of Policing and Criminal Justice in Nineteenth-Century England,” Crime, Histoire et Societes/Crime, History and Societies 18 (2014): 131–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40. John McAuliffe quoted in the Chicago Inter Ocean, July 25, 1879; Chicago Tribune, April 25, April 26, and April 28, 1878; Chicago Tribune, May 12, 1878; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 81–84; Pierce, History of Chicago, 3:252–55; Jentz and Schneirov, Chicago in the Age of Capital, 224–25.

41. Richardson, James F., The New York Police, Colonial Times to 1901 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), 215–18Google Scholar; Richardson, James F., “To Control the City: the New York Police in Historical Perspective” in Cities in American History, eds. Jackson, Kenneth T. and Schultz, Stanley K. (New York: Knopf, 1972), 279Google Scholar; Gordon, “Studies in Irish and Irish-American Thought,” 427; Pierce, A History of Chicago, 3:300–301, 303–304.

42. Ffrench, Charles, Biographical History of the American Irish in Chicago (Chicago: American Biographical, 1897), 790–92Google Scholar; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 110–13; Progressive Age, October 8, 1881 (first quote); Progressive Age, September 10, 1881 (third quote); Progressive Age, March 25, 1882 (second quote); Western Workman, August 11, 1883; Mitrani, Sam, The Rise of the Chicago Police Department: Class and Conflict, 1850–1894 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2014), 146–48, 158–65Google Scholar.

43. Mitrani, Rise of the Chicago Police Department, 137–46.

44. Ozanne, Robert, A Century of Labor-Management Relations at McCormick and International Harvester (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1967), 16–17Google Scholar; Carroll, John Charles, Armour and His Times (New York: D. Appleton-Century, 1938), 171Google Scholar.

45. Association, Chicago Citizens, Annual Reports, 1885 (Chicago: Geo. K. Haslitt & Co., 1885), 22Google Scholar.

46. Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1110.

47. New York Times, April 16, 1883; O'Donnell, Edward T., Henry George and the Crisis of Inequality: Progress and Poverty in the Gilded Age (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015), 148Google Scholar.

48. New York's Central Labor Union claimed success in the 25 strikes it called between 1882 and 1884, but it spent $60,000 to win them, evidence that these victories could not be won on the picket line. Boycotts required fewer resources, see O'Donnell, Henry George and the Crisis of Inequality, 143–46.

49. Gordon, Michael, “The Labor Boycott in New York City, 1880–1886,” Labor History 15, no. 2 (1975): 184–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scobey, David, “Boycotting the Politics Factory: Labor Radicalism and the New York City Mayoral Election of 1884 [really 1886],” Radical History Review, no. 28–30 (September 1984): 298–300Google Scholar; Mendel, Ronald, “A Broad and Enobling Spirit”: Workers and Their Unions in Late Gilded Age New York and Brooklyn, 1886–1898, Contributions in Labor Studies 59 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), 4–5, 33–34Google Scholar; Ware, Norman, The Labor Movement in the United States, 1860–1895: A Study in Democracy (New York: Vintage Books, 1929), 336–338Google Scholar; O'Donnell, Henry George and the Crisis of Inequality, 173–200; The Boycotter, June 14, 1884; The Boycotter, January 31, 1885; The Boycotter, January 2, 1886; New York Sun, May 2, 1886.

50. Chicago Tribune, March 14 and April 2, 1887; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 168–73.

51. Gompers, Samuel, Seventy Years of Life and Labor: An Autobiography (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1925), 1:311Google Scholar; Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1096 (second quote); The Boycotter, June 19, July 3, and July 10, 1886; Czitrom, New York Exposed, 65 (third quote).

52. Shefter, Martin, “The Electoral Foundations of the Political Machine: New York City, 1884–1897” in The History of American Electoral Behavior, eds. Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan C., and Flanigan, William H. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978), 289–92Google Scholar; Beckert, Monied Metropolis, 315–17; Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1110 (quote); Hammack, Power and Society, 180 (quote), 318–19.

53. Czitrom, New York Exposed, 62–65 (quote at 64); New York Times, April 4, 1890; Johnson, Marilynn S., A History of Police Violence in New York City (Boston: Beacon Press, 2003), 33Google Scholar.

54. Knights of Labor, May 4 and July 20, 1889; Knights of Labor, March 4, 1891 (quote); Chicago Times, May 7 and June 25, 1889; Chester McArthur Destler, “The People's Party Illinois, 1888–1896: A Phase of the Populist Revolt” (PhD diss. University of Chicago, 1932), 100 n.2 (estimate); Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 279–84.

55. Chicago Tribune, June 1, June 7, and June 8, 1890; Chicago Tribune, April 13 and April 27, 1900; Spahr, Charles, America's Working People (New York: Longman's Green and Co., 1900), 172, 173, 175Google Scholar; Schneirov, Richard and Suhrbur, Thomas J., Union Brotherhood, Union Town, the History of the Carpenters’ Union of Chicago, 1863–1987 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988), 39–40, 80–81Google Scholar (quote).

56. New York Sun, November 24, 1886.

57. Hammack, 178–79; Czitrom, New York Exposed, xi–xii, 295–96; Burrows and Wallace, Gotham, 1167–69, 1192–93; Johnson, Marilynn S., Street Justice: A History of Police Violence in New York City (Boston: Beacon Press, 2003), 55Google Scholar.

58. Holli, Melvin, Reform in Detroit: Hazen S. Pingree and Urban Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Thelen, David P., The New Citizenship: Origins of Progressivism in Wisconsin, 1885–1900 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1972)Google Scholar; Stromquist, Shelton, “The Crucible of Class: Cleveland Politics and the Origins of Municipal Reform in the Progressive Era,” Journal of Urban History 23, no. 2 (January 1997): 192–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 260–97; 329–63; Holli, Reform in Detroit, chap. 8, makes the distinction between structural and social reformers; for a critical evaluation that nonetheless builds on the distinction see Finegold, Experts and Politicians, 21–22.

59. Stead, William T., If Christ Came to Chicago!: A Plea for the Union of All Who Love in the Service of All Who Suffer (Chicago: Laird and Lee, 1894)Google Scholar; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 333–35, 341–42, 353–55, 369–70; Connolly, James J., An Elusive Unity: Urban Democracy and Machine Politics in Industrializing America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010), 195–97 (quote at 195)Google Scholar.

60. Finegold, Experts and Politicians, 4–5, 45–67, 138–−68; Leidenberger, Georg, Chicago's Progressive Alliance: Labor and the Bid for Public Streetcars (De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

61. Shefter, Martin, “Regional Receptivity to Reform: The Legacy of the Progressive Era,” Political Science Quarterly 98 (Autumn 1983), 459–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kleppner, Paul, “Voters and Parties in the Western States, 1876–1900,” Western Historical Quarterly 14 (January 1983): 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clemens, Elizabeth, The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in America, 1890–1925 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 78Google Scholar.

62. In Chicago, much lower per capita city outlays than in New York, due to an 1879 state law limiting city debt severely limited patronage and probably played a role in pushing Harrison toward a police policy of neutrality during strikes as an alternative way of appealing to labor. See Erie, Rainbow's End, 46, table 4, and Whitten, Robert H., “The Assessment of Taxes in Chicago,” Journal of Political Economy 5 (March 1897):175–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63. Clemens, The People's Lobby, 73–78, 90–93; Shefter, “Regional Receptivity to Reform”; regional variation in the success of reform defined broadly is also discussed in Finegold, Experts and Politicians and Bridges, Amy, “Winning the West to Municipal Reform,” Urban Affairs Review 27 (June 1992): 494–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Bridges, Amy and Kronick, Richard, “Writing the Rules to Win the Game: The Middle-Class Regimes of Municipal Reformers,” Urban Affairs Review 34 (May 1999): 691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. U.S. Census Office, Ninth Census, 1870, vol. 1 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1872), table 8, 386–91; according to Conzen, Kathleen, “The large cities of the Midwest became the most characteristically German environments” in her entry “Germans,” in Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, eds. Thernstrom, Stephan, Orlov, Ann, and Handlin, Oscar (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1980), 412–13Google Scholar; Daniels, Roger, “The Immigrant Experience in the Gilded Age” in The Gilded Age: Essays on the Origins of Modern America, ed. Calhoun, Charles W. (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Books, 1996), 63–89, esp. 73–74Google Scholar.

65. Kleppner, Paul, The Third Electoral System, 1853–1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1979), 138–40Google Scholar; the importance of the Germans in Midwest politics is also discussed in Jensen, Richard J., The Winning of the Midwest, Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Schneider, Dorothee, Trade Unions and Community: The German Working Class in New York City, 1870–1900 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1994), 39–41Google Scholar; Nadel, Stanley, Little Germany: Ethnicity, Religion and Class in New York City, 1845–80 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990), 148–52Google Scholar. Ottendorfer led an ineffectual move toward the Socialist Party after the Tomkins Square incident.

66. Hammack, Power and Society, table 4.4, 124, 318; Schneider, Trade Unions and Community, 38–39; see also, O'Donnell, Henry George and the Crisis of Inequality, 137–40; Mendel, A Broad and Enobling Spirit, 34.

67. Erie, Rainbow's End, 27–66.

68. New York Sun, May 2, 1886; Foner, Eric, “Class, Ethnicity, and Radicalism in the Gilded Age: The Land League in Irish-American,” in Politics and Ideology in the Age of Civil War, ed. Foner, Eric (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), 150–200Google Scholar. On the lack of enthusiasm for eight hours among New York's workers, with the exception of German trade unionists, see Schneider, Trade Unions and Community, 120–22; on Chicago see Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 194–99.

69. Fink, Workingmen's Democracy, 28–29; Oestreicher, Richard, “Politics and Labor, Nineteenth Century” in Encyclopedia of U.S. Labor and Working-Class History, ed. Arnesen, Eric (New York: Routledge, 2007), 1100Google Scholar; Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 55, 81–83, 87, 211–35, 280–81, 287, 343–48; U.S. Census Office, Compendium of the Eleventh Census (1890), Part II (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1894), 604–05.

70. Conzen, “Germans” (quote); Fink, Workingman's Democracy, 206; U.S. Census Office, Compendium of the Tenth Census (1880), Part I (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1883), 548–49Google Scholar; U.S. Census Office, Compendium of the Eleventh Census, 604–05

71. Gavett, Thomas W., Development of the Labor Movement in Milwaukee (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1965), 33, 43–46, 69–77, 93–94Google Scholar; Fink, Workingmen's Democracy, 180–210.

72. Harring, Policing a Class Society, 82.

73. U.S. Tenth Census, Part I, 548–49 and U.S. Eleventh Census, Part II, 604–05; Kanter, Elliot J., “Class, Ethnicity, and Socialist Politics: St. Louis, 1876–1881,” UCLA Historical Journal 3 (1982), 54Google Scholar; Ansell and Burris, Bosses of the City Unite!, 28–29.

74. Ansell and Burris, Bosses of the City Unite!, 34–35.

75. “American Labour Movement,” Labour Leader, 58 (May 11, 1895); Schneirov, Labor and Urban Politics, 366–70.

76. Montgomery, David, Citizen Worker: The Experience of Workers in the United States with Democracy and the Free Market during the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 152–53Google Scholar.