Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:34:43.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progressing Towards a Freer Market in Australian Residential Aged Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2021

Susan F Cochrane
Affiliation:
Relationships Australia, Kingston, Australia. E-mail: scochrane@relationships.org.au
Alice L Holmes
Affiliation:
Health Law and Ageing Research Unit, Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
Joseph E Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Health Law and Ageing Research Unit, Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Australia. E-mail: joseph.ibrahim@monash.edu

Abstract

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety has again focussed attention on the failings of the Australian aged care system. Residential aged care in Australia has become increasingly market-driven since the major reforms of 1997. The aims of increased marketisation include providing residents with greater choice, higher quality services, and increasing providers’ efficiency and innovation. However, marketisation is not meeting these aims, predominantly due to asymmetries of knowledge and power between residents and aged care providers. These asymmetries arise from inadequate provision of information, geographic disparities, urgency for care as needs arise acutely, and issues surrounding safety, including cultural safety. We propose a human rights framework, supported by responsive regulation, to overcome the failings of the current system and deliver an improved aged care system which is fit for purpose.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth).Google Scholar
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) (2019) Guidance and Resources for Providers to support the Aged Care Quality Standards, Australia: ACQSC, https://www.agedcarequality.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/Guidance_%26_Resource_V14.pdf [accessed 10.10.2021].Google Scholar
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) (2020) Sector Performance Data: 1 January – 31 March 2020, Australia: ACQSC, https://agedcarequality.govcms.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/ACQSC_Sector_Performance_JAN-MAR_2020_FINAL.pdf [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Act 2018 (Cth).Google Scholar
Aged Care Sector Committee (2016) Aged Care Roadmap, Australia: Aged Care Sector Committee, https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/aged-care-roadmap [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Amirkhanyan, A. (2008) ‘Privatizing public nursing homes: examining the effects on quality and access’, Public Administration Review, 68, 4, 665–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Bupa Aged Care Australia Pty Ltd (2020) FCA 602Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission (2013) Human Rights Based Approaches, https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/rights-and-freedoms/human-rights-based-approaches [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission (2014) UN Convention for the Rights of Older Persons, https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/speeches/un-convention-rights-older-persons [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission (2019) A Human Rights Perspective on Aged Care, Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commision, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2020-07/AWF.500.00267.pdf [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2018) Older Australia at a Glance, Canberra: AIHW, https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7f3b1c98-c308-45c6-956b-b599893bdf33/Older-Australia-at-a-glance.pdf.aspx?inline=true [accessed 21.09.2020].Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2020) Factsheet 2018-19: People Using Aged Care, Canberra: AIHW, https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/www_aihwgen/media/Factsheets-for-2019%e2%80%932020-GEN-update/People-using-aged-care-factsheet-2018%e2%80%9319.pdf [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Bishop, C. E. (1988) ‘Competition in the market for nursing home care’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 13, 2, 341–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, J. (2001) ‘The challenge of regulating care for older people in Australia’, BMJ, 323, 7310, 443–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braithwaite, J. (2011) ‘The essence of responsive regulation’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 44, 3, 475520.Google Scholar
Carnell, K. and Paterson, R. (2017) Review of National Aged Care Quality Regulatory Processes, https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/review-of-national-aged-care-quality-regulatory-processes-report [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Castle, N. G., Engberg, J. and Liu, D. (2007) ‘Have nursing home compare quality measure scores changed over time in response to competition?’, Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16, 3, 185–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J., Choi, S., Lee, S., Han, E. and Kim, M. (2016) ‘Does market competition facilitate resident-centred care among nursing homes? A comparative analysis’, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26, 1, 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, G. (1997) ‘Proposed changes to institutional residential aged care in Australia’, Current Issues Brief 27 1996-97, Possible implications of the 10 February 1997 exposure draft of the Aged Care Bill 1997, Australia: Parliament of Australia, https://www.aph.gov.au/sitecore/content/Home/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/CIB/CIB9697/97cib27#THE%20AUSTRALIAN [accessed 05.08.2021].Google Scholar
Comondore, V. R., Devereaux, P. J., Zhou, Q., Stone, S. B., Busse, J. W., Ravindran, N. C., Burns, K. E., Haines, T., Stringer, B., Cook, D. J., Walter, S. D., Sulliven, T., Berwanger, O., Bhandari, M., Banglawa, S., Lavis, J. N., Petrisor, B., Schünemann, H., Walsh, K., Bhatnagar, N. and Guyatt, G. H. (2009) ‘Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis’, BMJ, 339, 7717, b2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Councils on the Ageing (COTA) Australia (2018) Measuring Quality and Consumer Choice in Aged Care, Barton, ACT: COTA Australia, https://www.cota.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Quality-and-Choice-in-Aged-Care-Project-Report-FINAL-Feb-2018.pdf [accessed 24.09.2020].Google Scholar
Department of Health (2020) 2019-20 Report on the Operation of the Aged Care Act 1997, Canberra: Department of Health, https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/www_aihwgen/media/ROACA/20366-Health-Report-on-the-Operation-of-the-Aged-Care-Act-2019%e2%80%932020-accessible.pdf [accessed 24.12.2020].Google Scholar
Department of Health and Ageing (2010) 2009-10 Report on the Operation of the Aged Care Act 1997, Canberra: Department of Health, https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/www_aihwgen/media/ROACA/2009-10-ROACA.pdf [accessed 24.12.2020].Google Scholar
Eagar, K., Westera, A., Snoek, M., Kobel, C., Loggie, C. and Gordon, R. (2019) How Australian Residential Aged Care Staffing Levels Compare with International and National Benchmarks, Australia: Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/research-paper-1.pdf [accessed on 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (2017) Human Rights of Older Persons and Long-Term Care Project: The Application of International Human Rights Standards to Older Persons in Long-Term Care, http://ennhri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ennhri_application_of_human_rights_to_ltc_feb_2017.pdf [accessed on 04.07.2021].Google Scholar
Explanatory Memorandum, Aged Care Bill 1997 (Cth).Google Scholar
Glasby, J. (2005) ‘Direct payments and the social model of disability’, Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 12, 2, 4858.Google Scholar
Glasby, J. (2014) ‘The Controversies of choice and control: why some people might be hostile to English social care reforms’, The British Journal of Social Work, 44, 2, 252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C. (2008) ‘Increasing choice and control for older and disabled people: a critical review of new developments in England’, Social Policy and Administration, 42, 5, 451–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, D. C. and Hirth, R. A. (2003) ‘Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes’, Journal of Health Economics, 22, 1, 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabowski, D. C. and Town, R. J. (2011) ‘Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards’, Health Services Research, 46, 6, 16981719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibrahim, J. E., Bugeja, L., Willoughby, M., Bevan, M., Kipsaina, C., Young, C., Pham, T. and. Ranson, D. L. (2017) ‘Premature deaths of nursing home residents: an epidemiological analysis’, Medical Journal of Australia, 206, 10, 442–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Intrator, O., Feng, Z., Mor, V., Gifford, D., Bourbonniere, M. and Zinn, J. (2005) ‘The employment of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in U.S. nursing homes’, Gerontologist, 45, 4, 486–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janus, A. and Koslowski, A. (2019) ‘Whose responsibility? Elder support norms regarding the provision and financing of assistance with daily activities across economically developed countries’, European Journal of Ageing, 17, 95108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kates, S. (2011) Free Market Economics: An Introduction for the General Reader, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Konetzka, R. T. and Werner, R. M. (2010) ‘Applying market-based reforms to long-term care’, Health Affairs, 29, 1, 7480.Google ScholarPubMed
Kotecha, V. (2019) Plugging the Leaks in the UK Care Home Industry: Strategies for Resolving the Financial Crisis in the Residential and Nursing Home Sector, United Kingdom: Centre for Health and the Public Interest, https://chpi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CHPI-PluggingTheLeaks-Nov19-FINAL.pdf [accessed 06.07.2021].Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2007) The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services Through Choice and Competition, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L., Banerjee, A., Harrington, C., Jacobsen, F. and Szebehely, M. (2014) ‘It is a scandal!: comparing the causes and consequences of nursing home media scandals in five countries’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34, 12, 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National LGBTI Health Alliance (2019) Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety: National LGBTI Health Alliance Submission, Australia: National LGBTI Health Alliance, https://cotasa.org.au/lib/pdf/programs/National-LGBTI-HealthAlliance-RC-Submission-Oct19.pdf [accessed 10.10.21].Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2021) Update to the 2012 Analytical Outcome Study on the Normative Standards in International Human Rights Law in Relation to Older Persons, Working paper prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, https://social.un.org/ageing-working-group/documents/eleventh/OHCHR%20HROP%20working%20paper%2022%20Mar%202021.pdf [accessed 06.07.2021].Google Scholar
O’Neill, C., Harrington, C., Kitchener, M. and Saliba, D. (2003) ‘Quality of care in nursing homes: an analysis of relationships among profit, quality, and ownership’, Medical Care, 41, 12, 1318–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parliament of Australia (1997) Bills Digest 132 1996-97 Aged Care Bill 1997, Australia: Parliament of Australia, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/BD9697/97bd132#Purpose [accessed 05.08.2021].Google Scholar
Pearson, A. and Riggs, A. (1992) ‘Skills mix in Australian nursing homes’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 7, 767–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Productivity Commission (2011) Caring for Older Australians: Overview, Canberra: Productivity Commission, https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/aged-care/report/aged-care-overview-booklet.pdf [accessed 24.09.2020].Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (2017) Introducing Competition and Informed User Choice into Human Services: Reforms to Human Services, Canberra: Productivity Commission, https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/human-services/reforms/report/human-services-reforms-overview.pdf [accessed 24.09.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2019a) Interim Report: Neglect (Volume 1), Australia: Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-02/interim-report-volume-1.pdf [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2019b) Navigating the Maze: An Overview of Australia’s Current Aged Care System, Australia: Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/background-paper-1.pdff [accessed 10.10.2021].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2019c) ‘Transcript of remarks made by Commissioners and Counsel Assisting – 18 January 2019’, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/media/14996 [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2020a) Financing Aged Care: Consultation Paper 2, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/consultation_paper_2_-_financing_aged_care_0.pdf [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2020b) Residential Care Quality Indicator Profile (Volume 1 – By Provider Type), https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/acrc-residential-care-quality-indicator-profile-vol-1-by-provider-type.pdf [accessed 24.12.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2020c) They Look After You, You Look After Them: Community Attitudes to Ageing and Aged Care – Research Paper 5, Australia: Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/research-paper-5-they-look-after-you-you-look-after-them-community-attitudes-ageing-and-aged-care [accessed 10.09.2020].Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2020d) Aged Care and COVID-19: A Special Report, Australia: Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-12/aged-care-and-covid-19-a-special-report.pdf [accessed 07.07.2020].Google Scholar
Saunders, P. and Fine, M. (1992) ‘The mixed economy of support for the aged in Australia: lessons for privatisation’, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 3, 2, 1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretary of the Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1992) 175 CLR 218 (‘Re Marion’) Google Scholar
Tran, A., Nguyen, K., Gray, L. and Comans, T. (2019) ‘A systematic literature review of efficiency measurement in nursing homes’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 12, 2186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
User Rights Principles 2014 (Cth)Google Scholar
Weech-Maldonado, R., Zinn, J. S. and Brannon, D. (1999) ‘Managerial implications of corporate board involvement and perceived market competition for quality improvement in nursing homes’, Journal of Healthcare Management, 44, 5, 382–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winblad, U., Blomqvist, P. and Karlsson, A. (2017) ‘Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden’, BMC Health Services Research, 17, 1, 487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, M., Phibbs, S. and Severinsen, C. (2017) ‘”When morals and markets collide”: challenges to an ethic of care in aged residential care’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 11, 4, 365–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar