Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:35:17.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Services in Activation Policies in Finland and Italy: A Critical Appraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Angela Genova
Angela Genova*
Affiliation:
Institute of Sociology, University of Urbino, Via Saffi 15, 61029 Urbino, PU, Italy E-mail: angela.genova@uniurb.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The integration of welfare services in activation policies has been one of the common answers to welfare challenges in EU member states over the last two decades. The process has been interwoven with the rescaling both downwards and upwards of welfare regulative authorities. The article discusses the role of integrated services in activation policies in relation to the centralisation and decentralisation of welfare policies in a comparative perspective of different EU welfare regimes and highlights the role of local institutional milieus in shaping path-dependent modes of governance in integrated services.

Type
Themed Section on The Governance of Activation
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 379 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbier, J.-C. (2001), ‘Welfare to work policies in Europe: the current challenges of activation policies’, Document the travail n.11, Centre d'études de l'emploi, Paris.Google Scholar
Barbier, J-C. (2006), ‘Analyse comparative de l'activation de la protection sociale en France, Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne ed Danemark’, Rapport de recherche, Centre d'etudes de l'emploi, Paris, http://www.cee-recherche.fr/fr/rapports/protection_sociale_france_grande_bretagne_allemagne_danemark_31.pdf (20 September 2007).Google Scholar
Brenner, N. (2004), New State Spaces – Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2004), ‘The path-dependency of an idea: why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct’, Social Policy and Administration, 38, 2, 204–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo Suarez, E. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2005), ‘I paradossi dell'attivazione nel discorso istituzionale europeo’, La rivista delle politiche sociali, 1, 19–44.Google Scholar
Dean, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1992), Dependency Culture: The Explosion of a Myth, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
DiGaetano, A. and Strom, E. (2003), ‘Comparative urban governance: an integrated approach’, Urban Affaire Review, 38, 3, 356–95.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1987), ‘From poor relief to institutional welfare states: the development of Scandinavian social policy’, in Erikson, Robert et al. (eds), The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research, New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
European Commission (2003), La situazione sociale nell'Unione Europea 2003.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_model/index_en.html# 16 august 2007. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/07/st06/st06694.en07.pdf 16 august 2007.Google Scholar
Eurostat, (2007), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?pageid=1996.4532373&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&screen=welcomeref&open=/&product=STRIND_SOCOHE&depth=2 (15/Mar/08).Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1, 17–37.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2000), ‘Reforms guided by Consensus: the Welfare State in the Italian Transition’, in M. Ferrera and M. Rhodes (eds), Recasting the European Welfare State, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (ed.) (2005), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2006), Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politcs of Social Solidarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flora, P. (ed.) (1986), Growth to Limit: The European Welfare States since World War II, vol. II, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Genova, A. (2006), ‘The path dependent nature of urban governance: new emerging modes in Finland and in Italy’, The Greek Review of Social Research, special issue, 121: 105–35.Google Scholar
Hanesch, W., Stelzer-Orthofer, C. and Balzer, N. (2001), ‘Activation policies in minimum income schemes’, in Heikkila, M. and Keskitalo, E. (eds), Social Assistance in Europe: A Comparative Study on Minimum Income in Seven European Countries, Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
Heikkila, M. and Kautto, M. (2004), Welfare in Finland, Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
Heikkila, M. and Keskitalo, E. (eds) (2001), Social Assistance in Europe: A Comparative Study on Minimum Income in Seven European Countries, Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2002), ‘The self-transformation of the European social model(s)’, in Esping-Andersen, G.. (ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–213.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1994), ‘Post Fordism and the state’, in Amin, A.. (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (ed.) (2005), Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2008), ‘The subsidiarization of social policies: actors, processes and impacts – some reflections on the Italian case from a European perspective’, European Societies, 10, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y. and Genova, A. (2006), ‘From government fragmentation to local governance: welfare reforms and lost opportunities in Italy’, in P. Henman and M. Fenger, Administering welfare reform, Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y., Carbone, D. and Genova, A. (2007), ‘Diversi welfare diverse opportunità: Alcuni spunti di riflessione su attori e processi del cambiamento’, in Cimarelli, L.. (ed.), L'occupabilità delle fasce deboli: dalle criticità alle possibilità, Presupposti teorici, esperienze e buone prassi per l'inclusione lavorativa delle persone svantaggiate, Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
Keskitalo, E. and Mannila, S. (2004), ‘Activation policy – an answer to the problem of long-term unemployment and exclusion?’, in Heikkila, M. and Kautto, M., Welfare in Finland, Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
Leibfried, S. (1992), ‘Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community’, in Ferge, Z. and Kolberg, J.E.. (eds), Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Leichsenring, K. and Alaszewski, A. M. (ed.) (2004), Providing Integrated Health and Social Care for Older Persons: A European Overview of Issues at Stake, London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Tricky, H. (ed.) (2000), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1994), ‘Post–Fordist city politics’, in Amin, A.. (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 316–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingione, E. (ed.) (1996), Urban Poverty and Underclass: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 94, 2, 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, M. (2006), ‘Forget Lisbon? Reflections on the validity of the European social model’, La rivista delle politiche sociali, 1, 215–34.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N. (2003), ‘The global trend towards devolution and its implications’, Environment and planning: government and policy, 21, 3, 333–51.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (ed.) (2002), Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Local Poverty Regimes, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Timonen, V. (2003), Restructuring the Welfare State: Globalization and Social Policy Reform in Finland and Sweden, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar