Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:21:07.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Female Asylum Seekers: A Critical Attitude on UK Immigration Removal Centres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2019

Maria De Angelis
Maria De Angelis*
Affiliation:
Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University E-mail: M.De-Angelis@leedsbeckett.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The context to this article is sovereign biopower as experienced by female asylum seekers in the confined spaces of UK Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs). With approximately 27,000 migrants entering immigration detention in 2017, the UK’s immigration detention estate is one of the largest in Western Europe. Through an empirical study with former detainees, this article outlines how women experience Agamben’s politically bare life through IRC practices that confine, dehumanise, and compound their asylum vulnerabilities. It also explains how micro-transgressions around detention food, social relations, and faith practices reflect a Foucauldian critical attitude and restore a degree of political agency to asylum applicants. Centrally this article argues that everyday acts of resistance – confirming their identities as human / gendered / cultural beings with social belonging – can be read as political agency in women’s questioning of their asylum administration. As such, this article offers a rare insight on biopower and political agency as lived and performed by women inside the in/exclusive spaces of the IRC.

Keywords

Asylum seekerdetentionimmigration removal centres (IRCs)in/exclusionpolitical agency
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 207 - 224
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adogame, A. (2013) The African Christian Diaspora: New Currents and Emerging Trends in World Christianity, London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1997) ‘The camp as the nomos of the modern’, in De, H. Vries, S. Weber (eds.), Violence, Identity and Self-Determination, Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 106–118.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. D. Heller-Roazen, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G. (2000) Means Without End: Notes on Politics, trans. V. Vinetti and C. Casarino, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception, Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ager, A. and Strang, A. (2004) ‘The experience of integration: a qualitative study of refugee integration in the local communities of Pollockshaws and Islington’, https://lemosandcrane.co.uk/resources/Home%20Office%20-%20The%20Experience%20of%20Integration.pdf [accessed 05.09.2017].Google Scholar
Aliverti, A. (2016) ‘Doing away with decency? Foreigners, punishment and the liberal state’, in Eriksson, A. (ed.), Punishing the Other: The Social Production of Immorality Revisited, London, UK: Routledge, 124–144.Google Scholar
Amoore, L. and Hall, A. (2013) ‘The clown at the gates of the camp: sovereignty, resistance and the figure of the fool’, Security Dialogue, 44, 2, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, C. and Bhogal, I. (2009) Becoming a City of Sanctuary: A Practical Handbook with Inspiring Examples, Ripon: Plug and Tap Publishers.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2001) Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2004) Modernity and its Outcasts, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berry, E. (2009) ‘The deportation of “virtual national” offenders: the impact of the ECHR and EU law’, Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law, 23, 1, 11–23.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. and Schuster, L (2005) ‘At the extremes of exclusion: deportation, detention and dispersal’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 3, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, D. (2015) An Inspection of Removals October 2014-March 2015, London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Bosworth, M. (2012) ‘Subjectivity and identity in detention: punishment and society in a global age’, Theoretical Criminology, 16, 2, 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. (2013) ‘Can immigration detention be legitimate? Understanding confinement in a global world’, in Aas, K. F. and Bosworth, M. (eds.), The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. (2014) ‘Inside immigration detention centres: uncoupling detention from a criminal justice imagination’, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/inside-immigration-detention-centres/ [accessed 22.08.2017].10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199675470.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. (2017) ‘Border criminology and the changing nature of penal power’, in Liebling, A., Maruna, S. and Mc, L.Ara (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 373–390.Google Scholar
Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2014) ‘Citizenship and belonging in a women’s immigration detention centre’, in Phillips, C. and Webster, C. (eds.), New Directions in Race and Ethnicity, Abingdon: Routledge, 80–96.Google Scholar
Bosworth, M. and Kellezi, B. (2017) ‘Doing research in immigration removal centres: ethics, emotions and impact’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17, 2, 121–37.10.1177/1748895816646151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. and Vannier, M. (2016) ‘Human rights and immigration detention in France and the UK’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 18, 2, 157–176.10.1163/15718166-12342097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M., Hoyle, C. and Dempsey, M. M. (2011) ‘Researching trafficked women’, Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 9, 769–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M., Parmar, A., and Vazquez, Y. (eds.) (2018) Race, Criminal Justice and Immigration Control: Enforcing the Boundaries of Belonging, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bowling, B. (2013) ‘Epilogue: the borders of punishment: towards a criminology of mobility’, in Aas, K. F. and Bosworth, M. (eds.), The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, V. (2014) ‘Violence in Britain: behind the wire at immigration removal centres’, https://theconversation.com/violence-in-britain-behind-the-wire-at-immigration-removal-centres-25519 [accessed 13.06.2017].Google Scholar
Canning, V. (2017) ‘Brutality of British immigration detention system laid bare’, https://theconversation.com/brutality-of-british-immigration-detention-system-laid-bare-83396 [accessed 12.12.2017].Google Scholar
Carnet, P., Blanchard, C. and Ellis, J. (2014) The Azure Payment Card: The Humanitarian Cost of a Cashless System, London, UK: British Red Cross.Google Scholar
Conlon, D. (2016) ‘Hungering for freedom: asylum seekers’ hunger strikes – rethinking resistance as counter-conduct’, in Moran, D., Gill, N. and Conlon, D. (eds.), Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention, London, UK: Routledge, 133–48.Google Scholar
Council of the European Parliament (CoEP) (2008) ‘Directive 2008/115/EC on common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third country nationals’, Official Journal of the European Union, L348, 98–107. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:348:0098:0107:EN:PDF [accessed 04.01.2019].Google Scholar
Critchley, S. (2000) ‘Remarks on Derrida and Habermas’, Constellations, 7, 455–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, J. (2009) ‘Becoming bare life: asylum, hospitality and the politics of encampment’, Environment and Society D: Society and Space, 27, 649–65.Google Scholar
De Angelis, M. (2016) Human Trafficking: Women’s Stories of Agency, Newcastle: CS Press.Google Scholar
De Genova, N. (2010) ‘The deportation regime: sovereignty, space and the freedom of movement’, in De Genova, N. and Peultz, N. (eds.), The Deportation Machine: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 33–67.10.1215/9780822391340-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, K. and Kilty, J. M. (2016) ‘You are what you eat: exploring the relationship between women, food and incarceration’, Punishment and Society, 18, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detention Action (ed.) (2014) The State of Detention: Immigration Detention in the UK in 2014, London, UK: Detention Action.Google Scholar
De Vault, M. L. (1991) Feeding the Family: The Social Organisation of Caring as Gendered Work, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, B. and Davidson, H. (2017) ‘Australia’s off-shore detention regime is a brutal and obscene piece of self-delusion’, The Guardian, 29 November.Google Scholar
Durcan, G., Stubbs, J. and Boardman, J. (2017) Immigration Removal Centres in England: A Mental Health Needs Analysis, London, UK: Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
Ebaugh, H. and Chafetz, J. (2000) Religion and the New Immigrants, Oxford: AltaMira.Google Scholar
Edkins, J. and Pin-Fat, V. (2004) ‘Introduction: life, power, resistance’, in Edkins, J., Pin-Fat, V. and Shapiro, M. J. (eds.), Sovereign Lives, London, UK: Routledge, 1–123.Google Scholar
Edkins, J. and Pin-Fat, V. (2005) ‘Through the wire: relations of power and relations of violence’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 34, 1, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellermann, A. (2010) ‘Undocumented migrants and resistance in the liberal state’, Politics and Society, 38, 3, 408–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, D. (2011) ‘Policing borders, producing boundaries: the governmentality of immigration in dark times’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 213–26.10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, M. and Silove, D. (2006) ‘Detention of refugees’, British Medical Journal, 332, 251–52.10.1136/bmj.332.7536.251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1992) ‘New penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications’, Criminology, 30, 4, 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fekete, L. (2008) ‘Asylum rights: grinding down the Human Rights defenders’, European Race Bulletin, 65, 1–20.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London, UK: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997) ‘What is critique?’, in Lotringer, S. (ed.), The Politics of Truth, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 41–81.Google Scholar
Global Detention Project (GDP) (2016) ‘United Kingdom immigration detention profile: UK domestic law’, https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/UK-Immigration-Detention-Report.pdf [accessed 11.07.2017].Google Scholar
Hall, A. (2010) ‘These people could be anyone: fear, contempt (and empathy) in a British immigration removal centre’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 6, 881–98.10.1080/13691831003643330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. (2012) Border Watch: Cultures of Immigration Detention and Control, London, UK: Pluto.Google Scholar
Hales, L. and Gelsthorpe, L. (2012) The Criminalisation of Migrant Women, Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
HM Government (2007) Borders Act, 2007 (c.30), London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2000) Doing Qualitative Research Differently, London, UK: Sage.10.4135/9781849209007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Affairs Committee (2018) ‘HC 913 Immigration debate’, 8 May, http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/home-affairs-committee/immigration-detention/oral/82531.pdf [accessed 04.01.2019].Google Scholar
Home Office (03/2013) ‘Detention services order’, http://www.insidetime.org/download/rules_&_policies/IRC%20(Immigration%20Removal%20Centres)/DSO-2013-03_fluid-food-refusers.pdf [accessed 04.09.2017].Google Scholar
Home Office (04/2016) ‘Detention services order’, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523833/DSO_04-2016_Detainee_access_to_Internet.pdf [accessed 20.12.2018].Google Scholar
Home Office (2016) ‘Coercive powers: overview’, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/511251/Coercive_powers_v1.0.pdf [accessed 20.12.2018].Google Scholar
Home Office (2017a) Immigration Statistics January-March 2017, London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2017b) Immigration Statistics October-December 2016, London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2018) ‘Immigration bail’, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/733313/immigration-bail-v3.pdf [accessed 20.12.2018].Google Scholar
Isin, E. and Rygiel, K. (2007) ‘Abject spaces: frontiers, zones, camps’, in Dauphinee, E. and Masters, C. (eds.), The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–205.10.1007/978-1-137-04379-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, C. (2010) ‘Refugees, Europe, camps / state of exception: ‘into the zone’, the European Union and extraterritorial processing of migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers (theories and practice)’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29, 1, 92–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkki, L. (1995) ‘Refugees and exile: from ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 493–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankekar, P. (2005) ‘“India Shopping”: Indian grocery stores and transnational configurations of belonging’, in Watson, J. L. and Caldwell, M. L. (eds.), The Cultural Politics of Food and Eating: a Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 197–214.Google Scholar
Moore, J. M. (2015) ‘Prison – more than detention?’, Criminal Justice Matters, 102, 1, 11–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNevin, A. (2011) Contesting Citizenship: Irregular Migrants and New Frontiers of the Political, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. (2011) ‘Contestations and consequences of deportability: hunger strikes and the political agency of non-citizens’, Citizenship Studies, 15, 5, 597–611.10.1080/13621025.2011.583791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, T. and Gower, M. (2018) ‘Immigration detention in the UK: an overview’, HC Briefing Paper 7294, 12 September.Google Scholar
McHugh, J. (2015) ‘Roszke refugee camp update: makeshift shelter housing thousands in Hungary fleeing sectarian violence is accused of Human Rights violations’, International Business Times, 9 April.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (2018) ‘Handling of the Windrush situation’, https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Handling-of-the-Windrush-situation-1.pdf [accessed 20.12.2018].Google Scholar
Nyers, P. (2004) ‘What’s left of citizenship?’, Citizenship Studies, 8, 3, 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donoghue, A. (2015) ‘Sovereign exception: notes on the thought of Georgio Agamben’, Critical Legal Thinking, http://criticallegalthinking.com/2015/07/02/sovereign-exception-notes-on-the-thought-of-giorgio-agamben/ [accessed 03.01.2019].Google Scholar
Ohtani, E. and Phelps, J. (2016) Without Detention: Opportunities for Alternatives, London, UK: Detention Action.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. (2009) ‘But our citizenship is in heaven: a proposal for the future study of Christian citizenship in the global south’, Citizenship Studies, 13, 4, 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detention Action. (ed.) (2014) The State of Detention: Immigration Detention in the UK in 2014, London, UK: Detention Action.Google Scholar
Prison Reform Trust (PRT) (2017) Counted Out: Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women in the Criminal Justice System, London, UK: PRT.Google Scholar
Puggioni, R. (2006) ‘Resisting sovereign power: camps in-between exception and dissent’, in Huysmans, J., Dobson, A. and Prokhovnik, R. (eds.), The Politics of Protection: Sites of Insecurity and Political Agency, Oxford, UK: Routledge, 68–83.Google Scholar
Puggioni, R. (2014) ‘Speaking through the body: detention and bodily resistance in Italy’, Citizenship Studies, 18, 5, 562–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadan, A. (2013) ‘Spatialising the refugee camp’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redclift, V. (2013) ‘Abjects or agents? Camps, contests, and the creation of political space’, Citizenship Studies, 17, 3–4, 308–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiman, J. and Leighton, P. (2010) The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice, Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. (2016) ‘Tactics, agency and power in women’s prisons’, British Journal of Criminology, 56, 2, 332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rygiel, K. (2011) ‘Bordering solidarities: migrant activism and the politics of movement and camps at Calais’, Citizenship Studies, 15, 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, L. (2015) ‘Penal subjectivities: developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness’, Punishment and Society, 17, 1, 114–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, S. (2016) Review into the Welfare in Detention of Vulnerable People, London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Shaw, S. (2018) Assessment of Government Progress in Implementing the Report on the Welfare in Detention of Vulnerable People, London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Silverman, S.J. (2017) Immigration Detention in the UK, Migration Observatory Briefing, Compas:University of Oxford, http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Briefing-Immigration_Detention-2.pdf [accessed 04.01.2017].Google Scholar
Silverman, S. J. and Griffiths, M. E. B. (2018) Immigration Detention in the UK, Migration Observatory Briefing, Compas: University of Oxford, https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/immigration-detention-in-the-uk/ [accessed 11.10.2018].Google Scholar
Smoyer, A. (2016) ‘Making fatty girl cakes: food and resistance in a women’s prison’, The Prison Journal, 96, 2, 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoyer, A. and Lopes, G. (2017) ‘Hungry on the inside: prison food as concrete and symbolic punishment in a women’s prison’, Punishment and Society, 19, 2, 240–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, V. (2009) The Exclusionary Politics of Asylum, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, V. and Darling, J. (2013) ‘The minor politics of rightful presence: justice and relationality in City of Sanctuary’, International Political Sociology, 7, 1, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, G. (1958) The Society of Captives, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (2005) ‘Care as the work of citizens: a modest proposal’, in Friedman, M. (ed.), Women and Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, S. (2015) ‘Stuck in the middle: waiting and uncertainty in immigration detention’, Time and Society, 25, 1, 61–79.10.1177/0961463X15604518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2014) World at War, Geneva: UN Refugee Agency, http://www.unhcr.org/556725e69.pdf [accessed 06.07.2018].Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2016) Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2016, Geneva: UN Refugee Agency, http://www.unhcr.org/5943e8a34.pdf [accessed 12.07.2017].Google Scholar
Vecchio, F. and Ham, J. (2018) ‘From subsistence to resistance: asylum-seekers and the other ‘Occupy’ in Hong Kong’, Critical Social Policy, 38, 2, 201–21.10.1177/0261018317699162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zembylas, M. (2010) ‘Agamben’s theory of biopower and immigrants / refugees/ asylum seekers: discourses of citizenship and the implications for curriculum theorising,’ Journal of Curriculum Theorising, 26, 2, 31–45.Google Scholar
Ziarek, E. P. (2008) ‘Bare life on strike: notes on the biopolitics of race and gender’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 107, 1, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar