Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T17:59:43.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Devolution and Entrenched Household Poverty: Is Scotland Less Mobile?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Carlo Morelli  and
Paul Seaman
Carlo Morelli
Affiliation:
Economic Studies, School of Social and Environmental Sciences, Dundee University E-mail: c.j.morelli@dundee.ac.uk
Paul Seaman
Affiliation:
Economic Studies, School of Social and Environmental Sciences, Dundee University E-mail: p.t.seaman@dundee.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Scottish National Party led Scottish Government has identified household poverty as a key focus for its anti-poverty strategy. The government's ‘Solidarity Target’ seeks to both increase wealth and increase the share of total income gained by the bottom three deciles. The ability to demonstrate the advantages of policy divergence within Scotland, relative to the other parts of the United Kingdom, is central to the government's aim of gaining support for increased powers for the devolved government. This paper seeks to provide evidence on one aspect of the government's anti-poverty strategy: the degree to which Scotland differs from the rest of the UK over levels of entrenched poverty. The paper demonstrates that not only does Scotland have greater entrenched poverty but that the changes in mobility since the 1990s have impacted on Scotland to a lesser degree than the rest of the UK.

Type
Themed Section on Social Policy in the Devolved Scotland: Towards a Scottish Welfare State?
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 367 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, D. and Jack, G. (2005), ‘Income inequality’, in Ermisch, J.F. and Wright, R.E. (eds.), Changing Scotland: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. (2001), ‘Child poverty under Labour’, in Fimister, G. (ed.), Tackling Child Poverty in the UK: An End in Sight?, London: CPAG, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J. and Shepherd, A. (2005), Poverty and Inequality in Britain: 2005, London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callinicos, A. (2004), Equality, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Chzhen, Y. and Middleston, S. (2007), The Impact of Tax Credits on Mothers' Employment, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Clark, T., Dilnot, A., Goodman, A. and Myck, M. (2002), ‘Taxes and transfers 1997–2001’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 2, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornan, P. (2004), Ending Child Poverty by 2020: The First Five Years, London: CPAG.Google Scholar
Drakeford, M. (2005), ‘Wales and a third term of New Labour: devolution and the development of difference’, Critical Social Policy, 25, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. (1984), The Evolution of the Welfare State, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, P., Harkness, S. and Machin, S. (1999), ‘Poor kids: trends in child poverty in Britain, 1986–96’, Fiscal Studies, 20, 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, G. (2005), ‘Child poverty in Northern Ireland: the limits of welfare-to work policies’, Social Policy and Administration, 39, 1, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D.S. (2005), ‘Employability, skills mismatch and spatial mismatch in metropolitan labour markets’, Urban Studies, 42, 2, 221–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. (2005), ‘Policy convergence and divergence in Scotland under devolution’, Regional Studies, 39, 4, 453–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. and Mckendrick, J.H. (2007), ‘Definitions, measurements and incidence of poverty’, in Mckendrick, J.H., Mooney, G., Dickie, J. and Kelly, P. (eds.), Poverty in Scotland 2007, London: CPAG, pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Lambert, P.J. (2001), The Distribution and Redistribution of Income: A Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edn, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. (1993), The Welfare State in Britain since 1945, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, G. and Johnstone, C. (2000), ‘Scotland divided: poverty, inequality and the Scottish parliament’, Critical Social Policy, 63, 155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, C. and Seaman, P. (2007), ‘Devolution and inequality: a failure to create a community of equals?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G., MacInnes, T. and Kenway, P. (2008), Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion 2008, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Rodríguez–Pose, A. and Gill, N. (2004), ‘Is there a global link between regional disparities and devolution?’, Environment and Planning, A, 36, 2097–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Government (2008), Taking Forward the Government Economic Strategy: A Discussion Paper on Tackling Poverty, Inequality and Deprivation, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Taylor, M., Berthoud, R. and Jenkins, S. (2004), ‘Low income and multiple disadvantage 1991–2001: analysis of the British Household Panel Survey’, report for the Social Exclusion Unit in the Breaking the Cycle series, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.Google Scholar