Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T11:55:29.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basic Income in the UK: Assessing Prospects for Reform in an Age of Austerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2018

Luke Martinelli  and
Nick Pearce
Luke Martinelli
Affiliation:
Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, UK E-mail: L.A.Martinelli@bath.ac.uk
Nick Pearce
Affiliation:
Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, UK E-mail: N.Pearce@bath.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Of all the European welfare states, the UK most clearly represents the liberal regime type – notwithstanding a shift towards ‘social investment’ under New Labour – as defined by its residual, targeted benefit structure and increasingly punitive activation regime. The idiosyncratic institutional characteristics of the UK welfare state give rise to challenges and opportunities with respect to prospects for the introduction of (some form of) basic income. Despite a large and growing population of ‘disaffected’ precarious and low-paid workers and widespread dissatisfaction with the increasingly punitive sanctions regime, significant barriers to the emergence of a sufficiently large and coherent constituency of support for basic income remain. Thus, while institutional inertia and political considerations may preclude anything more than marginal changes to the existing system, a number of policy options falling short of a ‘full’ basic income – but retaining some of its core features – appear relatively feasible.

Keywords

Basic incomewelfare statepolitical partiestax-benefit modellingpolicy experiments
Type
Themed Section: Basic Income in European Welfare States: Opportunities and Constraints
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 265 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, A. (1996) ‘The case for a participation income’, The Political Quarterly, 67, 1, 67–70.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P., Haüsermann, S., Kitschelt, H. and Kriesi, H. (eds.) (2015) The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, C. (2014) ‘Young people and the ageing electorate: breaking the unwritten rule of representative democracy’, Parliamentary Affairs, 67, 3, 708–25.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2005) ‘The politics of the new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states’, Policy and Politics, 33, 3, 431–39.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Palier, B. (2000) ‘How do welfare states change? Institutions and their impact on the politics of welfare state reform in Western Europe’, European Review, 8, 3, 333–52.Google Scholar
Broughton, N. and Richards, B. (2016) Tough Gig: Tackling Low Paid Self-Employment in London and the UK, London: Social Market Foundation.Google Scholar
Clery, E., Curtice, J. and Harding, R. (2017) British Social Attitudes: The 34th Report, London: NatCen Social Research.Google Scholar
Corlett, A. and Clarke, S. (2017) Living Standards 2017, London: Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2016) ‘The struggle for strategy: on the politics of the basic income proposal’, Politics, 36, 2, 131–41.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Ghysels, J. and Van Lancker, W. (2011) ‘The unequal benefits of activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 5, 472–85.Google Scholar
Gingrich, J. and Häusermann, S. (2015) ‘The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 1, 50–75.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S., Kurer, T. and Schwander, H. (2015) ‘High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences’, Socio-Economic Review, 13, 2, 235–58.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (ed.) (2017) The Uses of Social Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, A. and Oakley, L. (2014) The Social Security System: Long-Term Trends and Recent Changes, IFS Briefing Note (BN156), London: IFS.Google Scholar
Mori, Ipsos (2017) Polling into Public Attitudes to Basic Income, Questionnaire written and developed by Joe Chrisp, and commissioned by the Institute for Policy Research (IPR), https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/half-uk-adults-would-support-universal-basic-income-principle [accessed 18.05.2018].Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2009) ‘Distribution and redistribution: the shadow of the nineteenth century’, World Politics, 61, 3, 438–86.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (2012) ‘The low road to basic income? Tax–benefit integration in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2008) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145–68.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2016) ‘Universal credit to basic income: a politically feasible transition?’, Basic Income Studies, 11, 2, 97–131.Google Scholar
Martinelli, L. (2017a) Assessing the Case for Universal Basic Income in the UK. IPR Policy Brief, Bath: Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, September.Google Scholar
Martinelli, L. (2017b) The Fiscal and Distributional Implications of Alternative Universal Basic Income Schemes in the UK. IPR Working Paper, Bath: Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, March.Google Scholar
Millar, J. (2009) ‘Tax credits’, in Millar, J. (ed.), Understanding Social Security: Issues for Policy and Practice (2nd edn), Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Painter, A. (2016) ‘The next great tax reform: Universal Basic Income’, City A.M., 12th May, http://www.cityam.com/240939/the-next-great-tax-reform-universal-basic-income [accessed 18.05.2018].Google Scholar
Painter, A. and Thuong, C. (2015) Creative Citizen, Creative State: The Principled and Pragmatic Case for a Universal Basic Income, London: RSA.Google Scholar
Palier, B. (2010) ‘The long Conservative corporatist road to welfare reforms’ in Palier, B. (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, N. and Taylor, E. (2013) ‘Government spending and welfare’, in Park, A., Bryson, C., Clery, E., Curtice, J. and Phillips, M. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 30th Report, London: NatCen Social Research.Google Scholar
Pennycook, M., Cory, G. and Alakeson, V. (2013) A Matter of Time: The Rise of Zero-Hours Contracts, London: Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1998) ‘Irresistible forces, immovable objects: post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 4, 539–60.Google Scholar
Reed, H. and Lansley, S. (2016) Universal Basic Income: An Idea Whose Time has Come? Compass.Google Scholar
Schröder, M. (2013) Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research: A Unifying Typology of Capitalisms, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011) The Precariat: The Dangerous New Class, Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Larsen, T. (2004) ‘The UK: a test case for the liberal welfare state?’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torry, M. (2016) An Evaluation of a Strictly Revenue Neutral Citizen's Income Scheme, Euromod working paper EM 5/16, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K., Vis, B. and Hemerijck, A. (2014) ‘The great recession and welfare state reform: is retrenchment really the only game left in town?’, Social Policy and Administration, 48, 7, 883–904.Google Scholar
Wren, A. (2013) ‘The political economy of the service transition’, Renewal, 21, 1, 67–76.Google Scholar