Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-s6gjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-24T15:53:52.568Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Global Decline of Intercountry Adoption: What Lies Ahead?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2012

Peter Selman*
School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University E-mail:


This article examines the latest trends in intercountry adoption worldwide, based on data from twenty-three receiving countries. Trends in the number of children sent by states of origin are based on their returns to the Hague Special Commission or on estimates derived from country data provided by the receiving states. The analysis concentrates on the period from 2004 to 2010 when estimated annual global numbers declined from 45,000 to 29,000, fewer than those recorded in 1998. The article will also look at changes in the age – and other characteristics – of children sent. Discussion centres on changes in sending countries, exploring the declines in China, Russia and Guatemala, the rise in adoptions from Haiti after the earthquake of 2010 and the emergence of Africa – and in particular Ethiopia – as a significant source of children for adoption. The article concludes with a consideration of the implications of a continuing high demand from childless couples in developed countries on the intercountry adoption ‘market’; and the prediction of David Smolin that, unless truly reformed, intercountry adoption will eventually be abolished and labeled as a ‘neo-colonial mistake’.

Themed Section on Waiting for a Better World: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Intercountry Adoption
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abrams, T. (2010) ‘Artyom Savelyev: to Russia without Love’, The Huffington Post, 9 April, [accessed 06.05.2011].Google Scholar
Altstein, H. and Simon, R. (1991) Intercountry Adoption: A Multinational Perspective, New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bartholet, E. (2011) ‘International adoption: a way forward’, New York Law School Review, 55, 687–99, [accessed 05.09.2011].Google Scholar
Bergquist, K., Vonk, M., Kim, D. and Feit, M. (eds.) (2007) International Korean Adoption: A Fifty-Year History of Policy and Practice, New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Bunkers, K. M., Groza, V. and Lauer, D. P. (2009) ‘International adoption and child protection in Guatemala: a case of the tail wagging the dog’, International Social Work, 52, 3, 649–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, H. (2009) Old Lessons for a New World: Applying Adoption Research and Experience to Assisted Reproductive Technology, New York: Evan B Donaldson Adoption Institute.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. (2011) ‘Seeking the better interests of children with a new international law of adoption’, New York Law School Review, 55, 1, 773–9, [accessed 05.09.2011].Google Scholar
Commission for Intercountry Adoptions (2011) Data and Perpectives in Intercountry Adoption, Florence: Istituto degli Innocenti.Google Scholar
Dambach, M. and Baglietto, C. (2010) Haiti: ‘Expediting’ Intercountry Adoptions in the Aftermath of a Natural Disaster, Geneva: ISS, [accessed 23.05.2011].Google Scholar
Dambach, M. and Selman, P. (2011) ‘Figures reveal alarming augmentation in children adopted from Africa, whilst the numbers of those with disabilities remain disappointingly low in AFRICA: Terra Incognita’, ISS Monthly Review, 3–4, 1113.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. and Dasgupta, S. D. (2010) ‘Motherhood jeopardized: reproductive technologies in Indian communities’, in Chavkin, W. and Mather, J. M. (eds.), The Globalisation of Motherhood, London: Routledge, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar
Degeling, J. (2010) ‘Intercountry adoption technical assistance programme’, Report of Mission to Nepal, 23–27 November 2009, Hague Conference on Private International Law, The Hague, [accessed 05.09.2011].Google Scholar
Dobbs, J. K. (2011) ‘Ending South Korea's child export shame’, Foreign Policy in Focus, 23 June, [accessed 07.09.2011].Google Scholar
Dohle, A. (2008) ‘Inside story of an adoption scandal’, Cumberland Law Review, 39, 1, 131–85.Google Scholar
Dowling, M. and Brown, G. (2009) ‘Globalisation and international adoption from China’, Child and Family Social Work, 14, 3, 352–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, E. (2008) ‘The lie we love’, Foreign Policy, November/December, 59–66, [accessed 05.09.2011].Google Scholar
Hague Conference on Private International Law (2010) ‘Conclusions and recommendations of the Special Commission of June 2010’, HCCH, The Hague, [accessed 05.09.2011].Google Scholar
International Social Services (ISS) (2009) Intercountry Adoption from Viet Nam: Findings and Recommendations of an Assessment, Geneva: ISS, [accessed 21.06.2011].Google Scholar
Juntunnen, C. (2009) Both Ends Burning: My Story of Adopting Three Children from Haiti, Parker, Colorado: Outskirts Press Inc., [accessed 06.09.2011].Google Scholar
Meier, P. and Zhang, X. (2008) ‘Sold into adoption: the human baby trafficking scandal exposes vulnerabilities in Chinese adoptions to the United States’, Cumberland Law Review, 39, 1, 87130.Google Scholar
Mezmur, B. (2009a) ‘From Angelina (to Madonna) to Zoe's Ark: what are the “A–Z” lessons for intercountry adoptions in Africa’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23, 145–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezmur, B. (2009b) ‘Intercountry adoption as a measure of last resort in Africa: advancing the rights of child rather than a right to a child’, Sur – International Journal on Human Rights, 6, 3, 83104.Google Scholar
Mezmur, B. (2010) ‘The sins of the saviours: trafficking in the context of intercountry adoption from Africa’, paper presented at the Special Commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, The Hague, Netherlands, 17–25 June 2010, Information Document no. 2, wop/adop2010id02e.pdf [accessed 09.09.2011].Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2008) Uprooted: The Shipment of Poor Children to Canada, 1867–1907, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Rotabi, K. (2010) ‘From Guatemala to Ethiopia: shifts in intercountry adoption leaves Ethiopia vulnerable for child sales and other unethical practices’, The Social Work and Society Online News Magazine, [accessed 09.09.2011].Google Scholar
Rotabi, K. S. and Heine, , , T. M. (2010) ‘Commentary on Russian child adoption incidents: implications for global policy and practice’, Journal of Global Social Work Practice, 3–2, [accessed 06.09.2011].Google Scholar
Selman, P. (1998) ‘Intercountry adoption in Europe after the Hague Convention’, in Sykes, R. and Alcock, P. (eds.), Developments in European Social Policy: Convergence and Diversity, London: Policy Press, pp. 147–70.Google Scholar
Selman, P. (2006) ‘Trends in intercountry adoption 1998–2004: analysis of data from 20 receiving countries’, Journal of Population Research, 23, 183204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, P. (2009a) ‘From Bucharest to Beijing: changes in countries sending children for international adoption 1990 to 2006’, in Wrobel, G. and Neil, E. (eds.), International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, London: John Wiley, pp. 4169.Google Scholar
Selman, P. (2009b) ‘The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century’, International Social Work, 52, 3, 575–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, P. (2010) ‘Intercountry adoption in Europe 1998–2009: patterns, trends and issues’, Adoption and Fostering, 34, 1, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, P. (2011) ‘Intercountry adoption after the Haiti earthquake: rescue or robbery?’, Adoption and Fostering, 35, 4, 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, P. (2012a) ‘The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century: global trends from 2001 to 2010’, in Gibbons, J. and Rotabi, K. (eds.), Intercountry Adoption: Policies, Practices, and Outcomes, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Selman, P. (2012b) ‘Global trends in intercountry adoption: 2001–2010’, Adoption Advocate, 44, [accessed 12.03.2012].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2005) ‘The two faces of intercountry adoption: the significance of the Indian adoption scandals?’, Seton Hall Law Review, 35, 403–93, [accessed 08.05.2011].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2006) ‘Child laundering: how the intercountry adoption system legitimizes and incentivizes the practices of buying, trafficking, kidnapping, and stealing children’, Wayne Law Review, 52, 1, 113200, [accessed 08.05.2011].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2007a) ‘Intercountry adoption and poverty: a human rights analysis’, Capital University Law Review, 36, 413–53, [accessed 03.01.2012].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2007b) ‘Child laundering as exploitation: applying anti-trafficking norms to intercountry adoption under the coming Hague regime’, Vermont Law Review, 32, 155, [accessed 04.05.2011].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2010a) ‘Child laundering and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: the future and past of intercountry adoption’, University of Louisville Law Review, 48, 441–98, [accessed 06.09.2011].Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2010b) ‘Abduction, sale and traffic in children in the context of intercountry adoption’, paper presented at the Special Commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, The Hague, Netherlands, June 2010, Information Document no. 1, accessed 09.09.2011]Google Scholar
Smolin, D. (2011) ‘The missing girls of China: population, policy, culture, gender, abortion, abandonment, and adoption in East-Asian perspective’, Cumberland Law Review, 41, 1, 165, [accessed 09.09.2011].Google Scholar
Stuy, B. (2009) ‘Why the wait time increase?’, 7 December 2009, Scholar
Tae-hoon, L. (2010) ‘New law to restrict adoption by foreigners’, The KoreanTimes, 30 June, [accessed 06.09.2011].Google Scholar
Trenka, J. (2009) Fugitive Provisions: An Adoptee's Return to Korea, Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.Google Scholar
UNICEF and Terre Des Hommes (2008) Adopting: The Rights of the Child. A Study of Intercountry Adoption and Its Influence on Child Protection in Nepal, Kathmandu: Terre des Hommes Foundation.Google Scholar
US Department of State (2011a) ‘Significant delays remain likely for cases presented to Ethiopia's Ministry of Women, Children and Youth Affairs after March 8, 2011’, Country Specific Notice 05.04.2011, [accessed 09.09.2011].Google Scholar
US Department of State (2011b) Confirmation of orphanage closures in Ethiopia. Country Specific Notice 03.08.2011, [accessed 09.09.2011] .Google Scholar
Watson, J. (2011) ‘Surrogacy scandal raises question about regulation’, Bloomberg Businessweek, 12 August, [accessed 06.09.2011].Google Scholar