Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T01:47:48.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deliberation, History and Reading: A Response to Schweiker and Wolterstorff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Oliver O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Christ Church Oxford OX1 1DP

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Review
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 James Bosweli, Life of Johnson, 1.5.1783.

2 Desire of the Nations, p. 273.

3 Augustine, Confessions 4.4.9: Factus eram ipse mihi magna quaestio.

4 Desire, p. 148.

5 Psalm 37:11, for example, effects the pregnant conjunction of these two notions.

6 Aristotle's terms in Nicomachean Ethics 5 (1132 b 24) are ‘distributive’ and ‘corrective’. I follow Hugo Grotius in preferring ‘attributive’ as the clearer and more comprehensive term.

7 That consideration seems to lie behind, but surely does not justify, Wolterstorff's puzzling interpretative aside: ‘God's concern is solely the health of the church; most of the time that appears to be O'Donovan's view,’

8 Iliad 6.392–496.

9 Beowulf 1–11 translated by Heany, Seamus (London: Faber & Faber, 1999).Google Scholar

10 p. 194.

11 Palestine: the prize and price of Zion (London and Washington: Cassell, 1997).Google Scholar