Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T18:18:56.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scripture and Tradition: Remarks on the Problem of Tradition in Theology Today1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2009

Extract

The problem of Scripture and tradition is again causing much discussion both among Catholic and among Protestant theologians. It is certainly no exaggeration to say that since the Reformation this question has never been so much to the fore as it is today. And the outstanding characteristic of this discussion is the fact that both sides realise the problem can no longer be posed in the same way as it was during the Reformation period, and especially during the period of great religious controversies after the Reformation. That is a good sign, for it is the first condition for progress in interconfessional discussion. The development of the Roman Catholic and Reformation Churches, and especially the new theological situation, compel us to re-examine the teaching of Scripture and of tradition, and the relation between them. This research is now being carried out very thoroughly by both confessions—but the situation is still by no means clear; it remains very complex. From both confessions we are waiting to hear what the outcome will be.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 338 note 1 Denzinger, , Enchiridion Symbolorum, 783.Google Scholar

page 338 note 2 Congar, M. J., ‘Théologie’, Diet. Theol. cath. XV. 1, p. 464Google Scholar; and Ebeling, G., Die Ceschichtlichkeit derkirche u. ihrer Verkündigung als theol. Problem, 1954, p. 38ff.Google Scholar

page 339 note 1 Ternus, J. A., Divus Thomas, p. 35.Google Scholar

page 339 note 2 op. cit. p. 37.

page 339 note 3 ‘L'œcuménisme en XIXe siecle’, Irénikon, 1954, p. 251.

page 340 note 1 Bernard, R., ‘St. Thomas d'Aquin’, Somme théologique (Edit, Jeunes, dc la Revue des), La Foi 1, 1937, p. 367.Google Scholar

page 340 note 2 Ternus, J. A., Scholastik, 1935, p. 27Google Scholar. Thus also K. Adam, Das Wesen des Katholizismus.

page 340 note 3 See Marindola, , L'évolution homogène de dogme catholique, 1924.Google Scholar

page 340 note 4 Summa Theologica II a II ae, q. 45 a2.

page 340 note 5 See the bull Munificentissimus Deus, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 42, 1950, p. 758.

page 342 note 1 Ternus, J. A., Divus Thomas, p. 36.Google Scholar

page 343 note 1 Filograso, G., La Civilitá Catholica, 1951, p. 147.Google Scholar

page 344 note 1 p. 97.

page 346 note 1 See Moffatt, J., The Thrill of Tradition, p. 16f.Google Scholar

page 347 note 1 See Bacher, W., Tradition u. Tradenten in den Schulen Pälastinas u. Babylons, 1914Google Scholar. Bonsirven, J., Lajudaisme au temps de jésus Christ, 1, 1934, p. 263ff.Google Scholar

page 348 note 1 Campenhausen, H. v., Tradition u. Geist im Urchristentum, p. 355.Google Scholar

page 350 note 1 H. v. Campenhausen, op. cit. p. 355.

page 351 note 1 La Tradition, p. 12ff.; S.J.T. vol. 3, p. 181ff.

page 354 note 1 Brunner, P., Schrift u. Tradition, p. 20.Google Scholar

page 355 note 1 Cited from Schempp, P., Luthers Stellung zur heiligen Schrift, 1929, p. 33.Google Scholar