Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2008
One of the most striking aspects of recent scholarship concerning electoral politics in the Victorian countryside is the widespread consensus that has developed that landlords did not – as was so commonly averred by Radical politicians at the time – use the threat of eviction as a weapon with which to terrorise farming tenants into voting as they were instructed. In the work of Norman Gash, Richard Olney and Frank O'Gorman, English tenants are represented as being quite happy to follow the lead offered them by their landlords, both from a ‘semi-feudal’ sense of loyalty and from a sense of gratitude for past favours and the hope of further favours to come. Even in Ireland, where a historiography dominated by Pomfret presented a much bleaker picture of landlord-tenant relations, the process of revision has considerably modified the received view. J. H. Whyte has argued that the landowners were far less tyrannical than had been generally thought, and regards as particularly erroneous the idea that landlords had regular recourse to eviction to punish tenants who had voted contrary to their wishes. This policy was not used, he suggests, because it patently did not work. Whyte's insights, though they have been modified in certain respects, were recently upheld in W. E. Vaughan's study of landlord and tenant relations in mid-Victorian Ireland. The history of politics in the Irish countryside is thus seen as having approximated that of England, and recent scholarship suggests a similar picture for Lowland Scotland, where, outside the Famine years, patterns of eviction were similar to those in Ireland. In only one country do the landowners still retain intact their reputation for electoral tyranny: Wales.
1. Ashworth, Henry, Recollections of Richard Cobden (London, 1879), pp. 147, 171, 282.Google Scholar
2. Gash, N., Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–50 (2nd. edn., Hassocks, 1977), pp. 177–85Google Scholar; Olney, R., Lincolnshire Politics, 1832–85 (Oxford, 1973), pp. 32–48Google Scholar; O'Gorman, F., ‘Electoral Deference in Unreformed England, 1760–1832’, Journal of Modern History, 56 (1984), 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hoppen, K. T., Elections, Politics and Society in Ireland, 1832–85 (Oxford, 1984), p. 147.Google Scholar
8. Yr Amserau, 27Google ScholarEbrill, 1859, editorial, ‘Etholwyr Sir Feirionydd’Google Scholar; Jones, I. G., ‘Merioneth Politics at Mid-Century’ in Jones, I. G. (ed.), Explorations and Explanations: Essays in the Social History of Victorian Wales (Llandyssul, 1981), pp. 83–164Google Scholar, deals fully with this controversy.
9. PP 1868–9, VIII, Select Committee on Parliamentary and Municipal Elections, particularly the evidence of Thomas Hughes and Reverend Michael D. Jones.
10. For this fund see Cragoe, M., ‘John Griffith, Y Gohebydd, and the General Election of 1868 in Wales’, in Transactions of the Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion (forthcoming).Google Scholar
11. Jenkins, R. T., ‘The Development of Nationalism in Wales’, Sociological Review, 27 (1935), 163–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morgan, K. O., Wales in British Politics 1868–1922 (3rd. edn., Cardiff, 1980) pp. 22–7Google Scholar; Jenkins, P., A History of Modern Wales, 1536–1990 (London, 1992), pp. 321–4.Google Scholar
12. Hanham, H. J., Elections and Party Management: Politics in the time of Disraeli and Gladstone (London, 1959), pp. 13–14Google Scholar; Robbins, K., Nineteenth Century Britain: Integration and Diversity (Oxford, 1988), p. 110Google Scholar; Evans, E. J., The Forging of the Modern State: Early Industrial Britain, 1783–1870, 2nd. ed. (London, 1996), p. 374.Google Scholar
13. Pelling, H., ‘Land Reform and Class Conflict in Victorian Britain’, in The Structured Crowd: Essays in English Social History (Brighton, 1981), pp. 100–135Google Scholar; Biagini, E., Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform (Cambridge, 1992), pp. 50–60, 186–91.Google Scholar For a Welsh version of this, accusing landowners of giving short leases on chapels to force dissenters to vote as directed: Baner Ac Amserau Cymru, 14 Hydref 1868, 3–4, ‘Llythr Y Gohebydd’.Google Scholar
20. Beckett, J. V., ‘Landownership and Estate Management’, in Mingay, G. (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Vol. VI, 1750–1850 (Cambridge, 1989), p. 616.Google Scholar
21. Beastall, T. W., The Agricultural Revolution in Lincolnshire (Lincoln, 1978), p. 152.Google Scholar
22. Wordie, J. R., Estate Management in Eighteenth Century England: The Building of the Leveson-Gower Fortune (London, 1982), p. 184.Google Scholar
23. Wade-Martins, S., A Great Estate at Work: The Holkham Estate and its Inhabitants in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
24. Spring, D., The English Landed Estate in the Nineteenth Century: Its Administration (Baltimore, 1963), p. 110.Google Scholar
25. Short, B., ‘The Turnover of Tenants on the Ashburnham Estate, 1830–1850’, Sussex Archaeological Collections, 113 (1975), 164.Google Scholar
27. Thompson, F. M. L., English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1963), p. 202.Google Scholar
38. Cragoe, M., An Anglican Aristocracy: The Moral Economy of the Landed Estate in Carmarthenshire, 1832–1895 (Oxford, 1996), pp. 44–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Colyer, R., ‘Some Aspects of Land Occupation in Nineteenth-Century Cardiganshire’, Transactions of the Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion (1981), 85–6.Google Scholar
39. Chester Record Office, Stanley of Alderley MS, DSA/105/2, ‘WO Stanley 1838, ‘Journals & Notes’ [unfoliated], ‘May 1838’.
42. Jones, , ‘Merioneth Politics at Mid-Century’, remains the authoritative treatment of this controversy.Google Scholar
43. Reports of pressure being applied to tenants on both estates surfaced during the campign; Yr Amserau, 11 Mai 1859, ‘Brwydr Fawr Sir Feirionydd’.Google Scholar
44. Carnarvon and Denbigh Herald, 22nd 07 1868, Denbighshire and Merioneth nominations.Google Scholar
45. Baner Cymru, 27 Gorphenaf 1859, p. 465Google Scholar, ‘Yr Erlidigaeth yn Sir Feirionydd’; Yr Amserau, 31 Awst and 21 Medi 1859Google Scholar, advertisement: ‘Etholiad Sir Feirionydd a Thenantiaid Digartref’; Baner Ac Amserau Cymru, 26 Hydref 1859, p. 64.Google Scholar The subscription raised £80.
49. Baner Ac Amserau Cymru, 31 Mawrth 1869, p. 7Google Scholar, letter of ‘Tremydd’, ‘Sir Aberteifi: Dydd Dial y Toryaid’.
50. The Welsh-language Liberal newspapers printed Gohebydd's reports but not the landowners' responses. Baner Ac Amserau Cymru, 22 Rhagfyr 1869, pp. 4–5Google Scholar, ‘Y Merthyron Politicaidd’.
51. The tenants in question were David Davies of Rhosgoch, Llanycrwys (landlord, Mr. Harford of Falcondale); Joshua Thomas, Blaenina (Herbert Evans, Highmead); and David Evans of Penrhywddryce, Cydplwyf (Reverend Thomas Williams).
52. T. Williams, Nantbwlch (Reverend T. Jenkins); S. Jones, Dolgoy (D. Thomas, Llanfair); W. James, Corgan (Major Watkins, Llwynybrain).
55. One of these was Mr Jones, Maesyongiau, who was himelf accused of having evicted a tenant for political reason after the election – a fact which perhaps suggests that he was innocent of the charge made against him. This was not the only recorded instance: Cambria Daily Leader, 16th and 20th 12 1869.Google Scholar
64. The others were: Evan Beynon, Blaenycwm (Mr Davies, Bank House); Reverend W. M. Davies, Blaenycoed (Mr Green, Carmarthen); J. James, Wernddu (Colonel Powell, Nanteos); D. Jones, Brynchwyth (Colonel Powell, Nanteos); D. Evans, Erwen Fach (Colonel Saunders Davies, Pentre); Reverend D. Davies, Hafodhir (Earl of Lisburne).
72. As John Bowen, Llwyn Einon Ucha described in a letter respecting the eviction of Evan Beynon of Blaenycwm, tenant of Mr Davies, Bank House: ‘the plumper for Sartoris [Liberal candidate in Carmarthenshire] … was as a microscope for Mr. Davies to perceive … small wrong things done by Mr. E. B. magnified, so he discovered through his new glass that Evan Beynon was a “notoriously slovenly and ruinously bad farmer” …2. Welshman, 7th 01 1870.Google Scholar
76. Bowen Thomas also held land of his own elsewhere, and had been removing fodder from his rented holding to feed cattle thereon, contrary to his leasing agreement: Welshman, 24th 12 1869, and 4th 01 1870, letter of Mr Thomas of Parke.Google Scholar
82. Gwynedd Record Office, Caernarfon: X/Vaynol/2783, Duff, R. G. to Millington, John, 7th 11 1868.Google Scholar
83. I intend to deal with the Owen case in more detail elsewhere.