Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:47:09.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radical Democratic Inclusion: Why We Should Lower the Voting Age to 12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2022

Martin O'Neill
Martin O'Neill*
Affiliation:
University of York
*
martin.oneill@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Democratic societies such as the United Kingdom have come to fail their young citizens, often sacrificing their interests in a political process that gives much greater weight to the preferences and interests of older citizens. Against this background of intergenerational injustice, this article presents the case for a shift in the political system in the direction of radical democratic inclusion of younger citizens, through reducing the voting age to 12. This change in the voting age can be justified directly, with reference to the status, interests, and capacities of younger citizens, and it can also be justified as a remedy to existing forms of intergenerational injustice. This change in the voting age would require a parallel transformation in the role of secondary schools as part of the ‘critical infrastructure' of a democratic society, which would be part of a broader shift towards a more genuinely democratic political culture. The proposal is defended against less radical alternatives (such as votes at 16) and more radical alternatives (such as votes for younger children). The article concludes with some reflections on democracy and intergenerational justice in light of the Covid pandemic and the climate emergency.

Type
Paper
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 91: A Philosophers' Manifesto: Ideas and Arguments to Change the World , May 2022 , pp. 185 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckman, Ludvig, The Frontiers of Democracy: The Right to Vote and Its Limits, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 114–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidadanure, Juliana, ‘Youth Quotas, Diversity, and Long-Termism’, in Iñigo González-Ricoy and Axel Gosseries, eds., Institutions for Future Generations, (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bidadanure, Juliana, ‘Towards a Democratic Ethics of Youth Policies’, in Lever, Annabelle and Poama, Andrei, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy, (Routledge, 2018), 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Paul, ‘Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) Statistics’, Research Briefing, House of Commons Library, (13 January 2011). Online at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05778/Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Léon, Solidarité, (Armand Colin, 1902).Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry, On Education, (Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Bruch, Sarah K. and Soss, Joe, ‘Schooling as a Formative Political Experience: Authority Relations and the Education of Citizens’, Perspectives on Politics, 16.1 (2018), 36–57.Google Scholar
Callan, Eamon, Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy, (Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, Damian, ‘Young global climate strikers vow change is coming – from the streets’, The Guardian, (24 September, 2021).Google Scholar
Chan, Tak Wing and Clayton, Matthew, ‘Should the Voting Age be Lowered to Sixteen? Normative and Empirical Considerations’, Political Studies, 54.3 (2006), 553–58.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda, The Gun, the Ship and the Pen: Warfare, Constitutions and the Making of the Modern World, (Profile Books, 2021).Google Scholar
Cornwell, Megan, ‘Bishop brings forward Confirmation age to increase numbers receiving the sacrament’, The Tablet, (5 October, 2016).Google Scholar
Denny, Kevin and Doyle, Orla, ‘Does Voting History Matter? Analysing Persistence in Turnout’, American Journal of Political Science, 53.1 (2009), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Mark, ‘Why Mental Health is a Political Issue,’ The Guardian, (16 July, 2012).Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark, ‘Good for Nothing’, The Occupied Times, (19 March, 2014). Online here: https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=12841.Google Scholar
Foot, Paul, The Vote: How It Was Won and How It Was Undermined, (Viking, 2005)Google Scholar
Forrest, Adam, ‘School spending set to remain below 2010 levels – as poorest areas are “hammered” by big cuts’, The Independent, (1 September 2021).Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, ‘Contradictions of Capital and Care’, New Left Review, 100 (2016), 99–117.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P. and Schachar, Ron, ‘Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment’, American Journal of Poitical Science, 47.3 (2003), 540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, Axel, ‘Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity’, in Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas H., eds., Intergenerational Justice, (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinlein, Robert, Starship Troopers, new edition, (Hodder, 2015).Google Scholar
Johnston, Neil, ‘The History of the Parliamentary Franchise’, House of Commons Library, Research Paper 13/14 (2003).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, The Main Enterprise of the World: Rethinking Education, (Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Laden, Anthony Simon, ‘Learning to be Equal: Just Schools as Schools of Justice’, in Allen, Danielle and Reich, Rob, eds., Education, Justice and Democracy, (University of Chicago Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Lawrence, Mathew and Laybourn-Langton, Laurie, Planet on Fire: a Manifesto for the Age of Environmental Breakdown, (Verso, 2021).Google Scholar
Meyer, Lukas H., ‘Intergenerational Justice’, in Zalta, Edward N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition).Google Scholar
Milburn, Keir, Generation Left, (Polity Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Miliband, Ed, Go Big: How to Fix Our World, (Bodley Head, 2021).Google Scholar
Murray, Janet, ‘Students hit by scrapping of education maintenance allowance’, The Guardian, (25 October, 2010).Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner, Democracy Rules, (Allen Lane, 2021).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Martin, ‘What Should Egalitarians Believe?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36.2 (2008), 119–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Martin, ‘Free (and Fair) Markets without Capitalism: Political Values, Principles of Justice, and Property-Owning Democracy’, in O'Neill, Martin and Williamson, Thad, eds., Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Martin, ‘Philosophy and Public Policy after Piketty’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 25 (2017), 343–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Martin and Shields, Liam, ‘Equality of Opportunity and State Education’, The Philosophers’ Magazine, (7 June, 2017).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Martin, ‘Justice, Power, and Participatory Socialism: on Piketty's Capital and Ideology’, Analyse & Kritik, 43.1 (2021), 89–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin O'Neill and Thad Williamson, ‘Property-Owning Democracy and the Demands of Justice’, Living Reviews in Democracy, 1 (2009), 1–10.Google Scholar
Peto, Tommy, ‘Why the Voting Age Should be Lowered to 16’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 17.2 (2018), 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, (Harvard University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, Thomas, Capital and Ideology, (Harvard University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, ‘Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood’, American Political Science Review, 96.1 (2002), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, revised edition, (Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, (Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Runciman, David, ‘Democracy for Young People’, Talking Politics podcast, (5 December, 2018). Online at: https://www.talkingpoliticspodcast.com/blog/2018/129-democracy-for-young-peopleGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David, ‘Votes for children! Why we should lower the voting age to six’, The Guardian, (16 November, 2021).Google Scholar
Rush, Martyn, ‘Tony Benn's Plan to Democratise Britain’, Tribune, 26 February 2021.Google Scholar
Schemmel, Christian, Justice and Egalitarian Relations, (Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibieta, Luke, ‘School spending in England: trends over time and future outlook’, Briefing Note, Institute for Fiscal Studies, (2 September, 2021). Online at https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15588.Google Scholar
Smail, David, The Origin of Unhappiness: a New Understanding of Personal Distress, (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew, ‘Global climate strike: thousands join coordinated action around the world,’ The Guardian, (24 September, 2021).Google Scholar
Thunberg, Greta, No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference, (Penguin, 2019).Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam, Shutdown: How Covid Shook the World's Economy, (Allen Lane, 2021).Google Scholar
Vallance, Edward, A Radical History of Britain, (Little Brown, 2009).Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, ‘The Disenfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Injustice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27. 4 (1999), 292–333.Google Scholar
Weinstock, Daniel ‘What's So Funny about Voting Rights for Children?’, Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 18 (2020), 751–772.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan and de-Shalit, Avner, Disadvantage, (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Emma, ‘How Iceland Got Teens to Say No To Drugs’, The Atlantic, (19 January, 2017).Google Scholar
Zeglovits, Eva, ‘Political Interest of Adolescents Before and After Lowering the Voting Age: the Case of Austria’, Youth Studies, 16.8 (2013), 1084–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeglovits, Eva and Aichholzer, Julian, ‘Are People More Inclined to Vote at 16 than at 18? Evidence for First-Time Voting Boost Among 16- to 25-Year-Olds in Austria’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24.3 (2014), 351–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar