Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:00:04.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Merits and Limits of Nationalising the Fossil Fuel Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2022

Fergus Green  and
Ingrid Robeyns
Fergus Green*
Affiliation:
University College London
Ingrid Robeyns*
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
*
fergus.green@ucl.ac.uk
I.A.M.Robeyns@uu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explore the desirability of an idea that has not received the attention it deserves by political philosophers: that governments should bring privately-owned fossil fuel companies into public ownership with a view to managing their wind-down in the public interest – often simply referred to as ‘nationalising the fossil fuel industry’. We aim to make a conditional case for public ownership of fossil fuel companies. We will assume certain conditions about government motivations and capacities that are similar to assumptions made generally in the philosophical and economic analysis of climate policies: that the government is suitably motivated, has effective control over the companies it acquires, and is able to sustain this motivation and control for long-enough to wind-down acquired companies in the public interest. We argue that bringing fossil fuel companies into public ownership, under these conditions, allows the government to take ten actions that are in the public interest, which will enhance social justice, enable a fair division of burdens and benefits, and strengthen democracy. We consider four plausible objections. While some of these point to the need for further research, they do not undermine our claim that nationalising the fossil fuel industry is a policy option that merits serious consideration.

Type
Paper
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 91: A Philosophers' Manifesto: Ideas and Arguments to Change the World , May 2022 , pp. 53 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alperovitz, Gar, Guinan, Joe, and Hanna, Thomas M., ‘The Policy Weapon Climate Activists Need.’ The Nation (2017) https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-policy-weapon-climate-activists-need/.Google Scholar
Arnold, Samuel, ‘Socialism.’ In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/socialis/.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Kate, ‘A Moderate Proposal: Nationalize the Fossil Fuel Industry’, The New Republic, (2020a) https://newrepublic.com/article/156941/moderate-proposal-nationalize-fossil-fuel-industry.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Kate, ‘The Death of the Fossil Fuel Industry Could Be Disastrous for Workers. Now's the Time to Nationalise It’, Novara Media (2020b) https://novaramedia.com/2020/12/08/the-death-of-the-fossil-fuel-industry-could-be-disastrous-nows-the-time-to-nationalise-it/.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Kate, Overheated: How Capitalism Broke the Planet – And How We Fight Back, (PublicAffairs, 2021).Google Scholar
Aronoff, Kate, Battistoni, Alyssa, Cohen, Daniel Aldana, and Riofrancos, Thea, A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal, (London: Verso, 2019).Google Scholar
Asheim, G. B., et al. ‘The Case for a Supply-Side Climate Treaty’, Science 365 (2019), 325–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, Robert, Cave, Martin, and Lodge, Martin, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, Kate and Fine, Ben, A Guide to the Systems of Provision Approach: Who Gets What, How and Why, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergin, Tom and Bousso, Ron, ‘Special Report: How Oil Majors Shift Billions in Profits to Island Tax Havens’, Reuters (2020) https://www.reuters.com/article/global-oil-tax-havens-idUSKBN28J1IK.Google Scholar
Bergquist, Parrish, Mildenberger, Matto, and Stokes, Leah C., ‘Combining Climate, Economic, and Social Policy Builds Public Support for Climate Action in the US.’ Environmental Research Letters 15(n.054019) (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Hoffmann, Matthew, ‘Climate Change, Metaphors and the Fractal Carbon Trap.’ Nature Climate Change 9 (2019) 919–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0618-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert, Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought, (New York: Routledge, 1986).Google Scholar
Bozuwa, Johanna and Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi O., ‘It's Time to Nationalize Shell. Private Oil Companies Are No Longer Fit for Purpose’ The Guardian (2021) https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/07/its-time-to-nationalize-shell-private-oil-companies-are-no-longer-fit-for-purpose.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon, ‘Climate Justice.’ In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University (2020) https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/justice-climate/.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon and Hepburn, Cameron, ‘Carbon Trading: Unethical, Unjust and Ineffective?’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69 (2011) 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, William K., ed. Regime of Obstruction: How Corporate Power Blocks Energy Democracy, (Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancel, Lucas, Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel, and Zucman, Gabriel, World Inequality Report 2022, (2021) https://wir2022.wid.world/.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas, ‘Money in Politics’ In The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, ed. Estlund, David, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 241–57.Google Scholar
Coady, David, Parry, Ian, Sears, Louis, and Shang, Baoping, How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies? (Washington, DC, 2015).Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A., Why Not Socialism? (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google ScholarPubMed
Collier, Paul and Venables, Anthony J., ‘Closing Coal: Economic and Moral Incentives.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30 (2015), 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fæhn, Taran et al. , ‘Climate Policies in a Fossil Fuel Producing Country: Demand versus Supply Side Policies’ Energy Journal 38 (2017), 77–102.Google Scholar
Farmer, J D et al. , ‘Sensitive Intervention Points in the Post-Carbon Transition’ Science 364 (2019), 132–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galvin, Ray and Healy, Noel, ‘The Green New Deal in the United States: What It Is and How to Pay for It’, Energy Research and Social Science 67 (n.101529) (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo, ‘Justice and Feasibility: A Dynamic Approach.’ In Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates, eds. Vallier, Kevin and Weber, Michael E., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo and Lawford-Smith, Holly, ‘Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration’ Political Studies 60 (2012), 809–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo and O'Neill, Martin, ‘Socialism’ In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University (2019). https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/socialism/.Google Scholar
Gosseries, Axel and Vanderborght, Yannick, eds. Arguing about Justice: Essays for Philippe van Parijs, (Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain, 2011).Google Scholar
Green, Fergus, ‘Anti-Fossil Fuel Norms’ Climatic Change 150 (2018) 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Fergus, ‘Radically Rethinking Climate Ethics: Carbon Lock-in and the Ethics of Decarbonisation.’ Working paper (on file with author) (2021).Google Scholar
Green, Fergus and Brandstedt, Eric, ‘Engaged Climate Ethics’, Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (2021), 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Fergus and Denniss, Richard, ‘Cutting with Both Arms of the Scissors: The Economic and Political Case for Restrictive Supply-Side Climate Policies’ Climatic Change 150 (2018) 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Fergus and Gambhir, Ajay, ‘Transitional Assistance Policies for Just, Equitable and Smooth Low-Carbon Transitions: Who, What and How?’ Climate Policy 20 (2020), 902–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jessica F., ‘Beyond Carbon Pricing: Tax Reform Is Climate Policy’ Global Policy (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinan, Joe and O'Neill, Martin, ‘The Institutional Turn: Labour's New Political Economy.’ Renewal 26 (2018) 5–16. https://renewal.org.uk/archive/vol-26-2018/the-institutional-turn-labours-new-political-economy/.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Abel et al. , ‘The Development of Partisan Polarization over the Green New Deal.’ Nature Climate Change 9 (2019), 940–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0621-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Thomas M., Our Common Wealth: The Return of Public Ownership in the United States, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M., McPherson, Michael S., and Satz, Debra, Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy, 3rd ed, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Patrick R. P. and Mihalyi, David, Massive and Misunderstood: Data-Driven Insights into National Oil Companies (2019). https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/documents/massive_and_misunderstood_data_driven_insights_into_national_oil_companies.pdf.Google Scholar
High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices, Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (Washington, DC, 2017).Google Scholar
Hyams, Keith, ‘A Just Response to Climate Change: Personal Carbon Allowances and the Normal-Functioning Approach’ Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2009), 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA, World Energy Outlook 2018, (Paris, 2018). https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/77ecf96c-5f4b-4d0d-9d93-d81b938217cb/World_Energy_Outlook_2018.pdf.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization, ‘Guidelines for a Just Transition towards Environmentally Sustainable Economies and Societies for All’ (2015) http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf.Google Scholar
Kartha, Sivan, Caney, Simon, Dubash, Navroz K., and Muttitt, Greg, ‘Whose Carbon Is Burnable? Equity Considerations in the Allocation of a “Right to Extract”’, Climatic Change 150 (2018), 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenner, Dario and Heede, Richard, ‘White Knights, or Horsemen of the Apocalypse? Prospects for Big Oil to Align Emissions with a 1.5°C Pathway’, Energy Research & Social Science, (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishimoto, Satoko, Steinfort, Lavinia, and Petitjean, Olivier, eds. The Future Is Public: Towards Democratic Ownership of Public Services, (Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, 2020).Google Scholar
Kurtzleben, Danielle, ‘Ocasio-Cortez Sees Green New Deal Progress In Biden Plan, But “It's Not Enough”’ NPR (2021). https://www.npr.org/2021/04/02/983398361/green-new-deal-leaders-see-biden-climate-plans-as-a-victory-kind-of?t=1622721551495.Google Scholar
Party, Labour, Labour Party Manifesto 2019, (2019). https://labour.org.uk/manifesto-2019/.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Mathew and Hanna, Thomas M., Ownership Futures: Towards Democratic Public Ownership in the 21st Century (2020). https://www.common-wealth.co.uk/reports/ownership-futures-towards-democratic-public-ownership-in-the-twenty-first-century#chapter-1.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William and Shin, Jang-Sup, Predatory Value Extraction, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenferna, Georges Alexandre, ‘Can We Equitably Manage the End of the Fossil Fuel Era?’ Energy Research and Social Science 35 (2018) 217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdavi, Paasha,. ‘Why Do Leaders Nationalize the Oil Industry? The Politics of Resource Expropriation’ Energy Policy 75 (2014) 228–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahdavi, Paasha, Power Grab: Political Survival through Extractive Resource Nationalization, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Manley, David and Heller, Patrick R. P., Risky Bet: National Oil Companies in the Energy Transition. (2021). https://resourcegovernance.org/analysis-tools/publications/risky-bet-national-oil-companies-energy-transition.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Private vs Public Sector Myths, (London: Anthem, 2013).Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen and Whelan, Christopher, ‘The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control’ Modern Law Review, 51 (1991) 848–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksins, Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muttitt, Greg and Kartha, Sivan, ‘Equity, Climate Justice and Fossil Fuel Extraction: Principles for a Managed Phase Out’ Climate Policy 20 (2020), 1024–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Peter and Simms, Andrew, ‘Towards a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty’ Climate Policy 20 (2020), 1043–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Carol and Lenzmann, Frank, ‘The Social and Economic Consequences of the Fossil Fuel Supply Chain’ MRS Energy & Sustainability, 3 (2016) 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Ilona M. et al. , ‘Social Tipping Dynamics for Stabilizing Earth's Climate by 2050’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (2020), 2354–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, Edward A., ‘The Ethics of Emissions Trading’ WIRES Climate Change 4 (2013) 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M., Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Paul, Mark, Skandier, Carla Santos, and Renzy, Rory, Out of Time: The Case for Nationalizing the Fossil Fuel Industry (2020). https://thenextsystem.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/OutofTime-Report_Final%282%29pages.pdf.Google Scholar
Pettifor, Ann, The Case for the Green New Deal, (London: Verso, 2019).Google Scholar
Piggot, Georgia, Erickson, Peter, van Asselt, Harro, and Lazarus, Michael, ‘Swimming Upstream: Addressing Fossil Fuel Supply under the UNFCCC’ Climate Policy 18 (2018), 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Varshini and Girgenti, Guido, eds., Winning the Green New Deal: Why We Must, How We Can, (London: Simon & Schuster, 2020).Google Scholar
Rentier, Gerrit, Lelieveldt, Herman and Kramer, Gert Jan, ‘Varieties of Coal-Fired Power Phase-out across Europe’ Energy Policy 132 (2019), 620–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid, Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined, (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Dorothea and Zimmermann, Klaus F.,. ‘Bad Bank(s) and the Recapitalisation of the Banking Sector’ Intereconomics 44 (2009) 215–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Nicholas, ‘The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models’, Journal of Economic Literature 51 (2013), 838–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Leah C., Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, Lynn A., The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations, and the Public, (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2012).Google Scholar
Sweeney, Sean, ‘There May Be No Choice but to Nationalize Oil and Gas – and Renewables, Too.’ Jacobin (2020). https://jacobinmag.com/2020/08/nationalize-fossil-fuels-green-new-deal-big-oil.Google Scholar
UNEP, Emissions Gap Report 2021: The Heat Is On – A World of Climate Promises Not Yet Delivered, (Nairobi, 2021).Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin L., ‘Is the Price System or Rationing More Effective in Getting a Commodity to Those Who Need It Most?’ The Bell Journal of Economics 8 (1977), 517–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, Leif, Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence, and the Rules That Run the World, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin, Envisioning Real Utopias, (London: Verso, 2010).Google Scholar