Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-n6p7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-29T05:46:43.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monism and Statespace Structure*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Extract

Exotic ontologies are all the rage. Distant from common sense and often science as well, views like mereological essentialism, nihilism, and four-dimensionalism appeal to our desire to avoid arbitrariness, anthropocentrism, and metaphysical conundrums.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, David Z. (1996). “Elementary Quantum Metaphysics.” In Cushing, J. T., Fine, A. and Goldstein, S. (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, 277284. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick (1976). Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, John (O'Leary-) and Cortens, Andrew (1995). “Towards Ontological Nihilism.” Philosophical Studies 79: 143165.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terence and Potrč, Matjaž (2000). “Blobjectivism and Indirect Correspondence.” Facta Philosophica 2: 249270.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terence and Potrč, Matjaž (2002). “Addressing Questions for Blobjectivism.” Facta Philosophica 4: 311322.Google Scholar
Hudson, Hud (2002). “Moving Faster than Light.” Analysis 62: 203–5.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1983). “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77. Reprinted in Lewis 1999: 8–55.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1999). Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mundy, Brent (1987). “The Metaphysics of Quantity.” Philosophical Studies 51: 2954.Google Scholar
Parsons, Josh (2004). “Distributional Properties.” In Jackson, Frank and Priest, Graham (eds.), Lewisian Themes, 173–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Josh (MS). “Entension, Or How It Could Happen That an Object Is Wholly Located in Each of Many Places.” Available online at http://www.otago.ac.nz/philosophy/Staff/JoshParsons/papers/entension2.pdf.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate. Paperback edition by Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (2007). “From Nihilism to Monism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 175–91.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan (Forthcoming). “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2001). Four-Dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2002). “The Ersatz Pluriverse.” Journal of Philosophy 99: 279315.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore (2007). “Against Monism.” Analysis 67: 17.Google Scholar
Sider, Theodore  (2008). “Ontological Realism.” In Chalmers, David, Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan (eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael (1987). Causation: A Realist Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trogdon, Kelly (Forthcoming). “Monism and Intrinsicality.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (1990). Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar