Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T07:28:39.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The United States and the Origins of NATO 1946–1949

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Lawrence A. Kaplan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nato has been a phenomenon in international relations. It is unlike most multinational organizations of the past in that it has survived for a generation, and it has thereby fulfilled, at least, the minimal expectations of its founding fathers. Even more phenomenal for Americans has been the identification of the United States with an idea, a particular group of nations, and an organization which were all repugnant to a tradition that specifically isolated America from Europe. The origins of the North Atlantic Treaty are inextricably linked with the rediscovery of Europe by the United States.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 210 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Adler, Selig, The Isolationist Impulse: Its Twentieth Century Reaction (New York, 1957)Google Scholar; DeConde, Alexander, ed., Isolation and Security (Durham, 1957)Google Scholar, particularly the editor's chapter I “On Twentieth-Century Isolationism.”

2 Beard, Charles A., American Foreign Policy in the Making, 1932–1940: A Study in Responsibilities (New Haven, 1946)Google Scholar; Williams, William Appleman, The Tragedy of American Diplomacy (Cleveland and New York, 1959)Google Scholar.

3 Perkins, Dexter, The American Approach to Foreign Policy (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1951), particularly chapter 5, “The American Attitude toward War.”Google Scholar

4 Kennan's cablegram of February 22, 1946, from Moscow to Department of State, in Bernstein, Barton J. and Matusow, Allen J., eds., The Truman Administration (New York, 1966), p. 209Google Scholar.

5 Roosevelt's address on Yalta to the Congress, March 1, 1945, in Rosenman, Samuel I., ed., The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1944–45 (New York, 1950), p. 586Google Scholar.

6 Churchill telegram to Truman, May 11, 1945, in Bernstein, and Matusow, , op. cit., p. 167Google Scholar.

7 For two important statements of the “realist” view of American history see Kennan, George F., American Diplomacy, 1900–1950 (Chicago, 1951)Google Scholar and Morgenthau, Hans J., In Defense of the National Interest (New York, 1951)Google Scholar.

8 Tansill, Charles G., Back Door to War: Roosevelt Foreign Policy, 1933–1941 (Chicago, 1952)Google Scholar; Beard, Charles A., President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War, 1941: A Study in Appearances and Reality (New Haven, 1948)Google Scholar; Barnes, Harry Elmer, ed., Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (Caldwell, 1953)Google Scholar; Wittmer, Felix, The Yalta Betrayal (Caldwell, 1953)Google Scholar.

9 Broadcast Speech, Hoover, Herbert, “We Should Revise Our Foreign Policies,” in Addresses Upon the American Road, 1950–55 (Stanford, 1955), pp. 11–22Google Scholar. February 9, 1951; Joseph P. Kennedy's speech before the Law School Forum of the University of Virginia on December 12, 1958, in Jonas, Manfred, ed., American Foreign Relations in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1967)Google Scholar.

10 Unger, Irwin, “The ‘New Left’ and American History: Some Recent Trends in United States Historiography,” American Historical Review, LXXII (07, 1967), 1242Google Scholar; 1246–1249. Lasch, Christopher, “The Cold War, Revisited and Revisioned” in New York Times Magazine (01 14, 1968), 26 ff.Google Scholar Note particularly the role both articles assigned to W. A. Williams as a father figure of this group.

11 Mills, C. Wright, The Power Elite (New York, 1957)Google Scholar; Alperovitz, Gar, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (New York, 1965)Google Scholar; Barnet, Richard J. and Raskin, Marcus G., After Twenty Years: The Decline of NATO and the Search for a New Policy in Europe (New York, 1965)Google Scholar; Steel, Ronald, Pax Americana (New York, 1967)Google Scholar.

12 Kennan, George F., “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” Foreign Affairs, XXV (07, 1947), 582Google Scholar.

13 Kennan, George F., Memoirs, 1925–1950 (New York, 1967), pp. 358–359Google Scholar in which he blames himself for ambiguities in the “X” article that permitted a misinterpretation of “containment.”

14 President's message to joint session of the Congress (Truman Doctrine), March 12, 1947, in Department of State Bulletin, XVI (03 23, 1947), 537Google Scholar.

15 Lane, Elizabeth, “The United Kingdom, the United States and the Truman Doctrine,” Ms., unpublished seminar paper in American Diplomatic History, Kent State University, 1967Google Scholar.

16 See Wallace, Henry A., “My Alternative for the Marshall Plan,” New Republic, XXXVIII (01 12, 1948), 13–14Google Scholar; Lippmann, Walter, The Cold War: A Study in U. S. Foreign Policy (New York, 1947), pp. 52–57Google Scholar.

17 Millis, Walter, ed., The Forrestal Diaries (New York, 1951), p. 3921Google Scholar.

18 Senator Vandenberg, Arthur H., Hearings, North Atlantic Treaty, U. S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 81st Congress, 1st Session, p. 242Google Scholar.

19 For a different view of the conference, see Vandenberg, Arthur H., ed., The Private Papers of Senator Vandenberg (Boston, 1952), p. 406Google Scholar.

20 “The North Atlantic Treaty,” Department of State Publication, no. 3462 (03, 1949)Google Scholar; Reston, James, New York Times, 04 22, 1949Google Scholar.

21 See, for example, an exchange between Acheson, and Senators Donnell, and Watkins, , Senate Hearings, Part I, 62–87Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., Part I, 146ff.

23 Ambassador Austin on the “Balance of Power,” ibid., Part I, 97.

24 See Kaplan, Lawrence S., “NATO and the Language of Isolationism,” South Atlantic Quarterly, LVIII (Spring, 1958), 204–216Google Scholar.

25 Congressional Record — Senate, 81st Congress, 1st Session, July 11, 1949, 9206.