Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:36:15.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rorty's Nietzschean Pragmatism: A Jamesian Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Jason M. Boffetti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Richard Rorty makes the case that Friedrich Nietzsche shared a common pragmatism with William James in order to incorporate certain Nietzschean themes into neo-pragmatism and to give his philosophy stronger pragmatic credentials. In making this connection, he establishes a version of pragmatism that rejects both epistemology and metaphysics, reduces the pragmatic theory of truth to “truth is what works,” places the Darwinian account of man at the center of the human narrative, and makes Nietzschean “self-creation” the chief end of a postmodern, post-religious liberal society. But if one reads James more faithfully (a task that Rorty rejects), it is clear that James does not succumb to the nihilism, perspectivalism, and atheism characteristic of Rorty's Nietzschean pragmatism. A more comprehensive reading of James's philosophy brings together James's pragmatism, his pluralism, and his radical empiricism. And this more complete interpretation of James's pragmatism offers a pluralistic and hopeful approach to politics that does not suffer from Nietzsche's and Rorty's nihilistic, relativistic, and antipolitical tendencies.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , Fall 2004 , pp. 605 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mounce, H. O., The Two Pragmatisms (London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar; Cormier, Harvey, The Truth Is What Works (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001).Google Scholar

2. Some exceptions include: Pettegrew, James, “Lives of Irony: Randolph Bourne, Richard Rorty, and A New Genealogy of Critical Pragmatism” in A Pragmatist's Progress? (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000) p. 104Google Scholar; Gander, Eric, The Last Conceptual Revolution (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999), p. 49Google Scholar; Malachowski, Alan, Richard Rorty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), p. 106.Google Scholar The most extensive treatment of the role of both Nietzsche, and Freud, in Rorty's, writing is Meaninglessness: The Solutions of Nietzsche, Freud, and Rorty by Casey, M. A. (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), especially chap. 3.Google Scholar

3. Johnson, Katherine Ann, “A Critique of Richard Rorty's Interpretation of William James's Pragmatist Theory of Truth” (Ph.D. dissertation, Boston College, 1994)Google Scholar; Cotkin, George, “William James and Richard Rorty: Context and Conversation” in Pragmatism: From Progressivism to Postmodernism, ed. Depew, David and Hollinger, Robert (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1995)Google Scholar; Cull, Ryan, “The Betrayal of Pragmatism: Rorty's Quarrel with James,” Philosophy and Literature 24 (2000): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. “Response to Bernstein” in Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics, ed. Saatkamp, Herman (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995), p. 71.Google Scholar See also “Dewey Between Hegel and Darwin,” in Truth and Progress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. West, Cornell makes this argument in “Nietzsche's Prefiguration of Postmodern American Philosophy” in The Cornell West Reader (New York: Basic Civitas Books, 1999), pp. 188–210.Google Scholar

6. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979), p. 4Google Scholar; Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), p. xviiGoogle Scholar; Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (1991), p. 13Google Scholar; Essays on Heidegger and Others (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 2Google Scholar; Truth and Progress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 3Google Scholar; Philosophy and Social Hope (New York: Penguin, 2000), p. xvi.Google Scholar

7. Rorty is so notorious for his “creative reinterpretations” that Daniel Dennett coined the phrase the “Rorty Factor”: “Take whatever Rorty says about anyone's views and multiply it by .742 to derive what they actually wrote” (“Richard Rorty,” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2000 [encyclopedia online]Google Scholar; available from http://;www.rep.routledge.com; Internet; accessed 12 December 2002.)

8. Hall, David observes in his book, Richard Rorty: Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994)Google Scholar, this same role for James, and Nietzsche, in Rorty's “Grand Narrative” of history: “It was the thinking of Friedrich Nietzsche and William James that finally led to the replacement of Romanticism with pragmatism” (pp. 20–21).Google Scholar

9. Nietzsche, , The Will to Power, trans. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J. (New York: Random House, 1967), sect. 608.Google ScholarQuoted in Essays on Heidegger, p. 2.Google Scholar

10. Rorty's brackets.

11. Nietzsche, , Will to Power, sect. 515.Google Scholar

12. Rorty, , Consequences of Pragmatism, p. 2.Google Scholar

13. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking in The Works of William James, ed. Burkhardt, Frederick H., Bowers, Fredson, and Skrupkelis, Ingas K. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975–1987), p. 62, italics added.Google Scholar

14. James, , The Meaning of Truth, in Works, p. 4.Google Scholar

15. James, , The Will to Believe and Other Essays, in Works, 1979, p. 5, italics added.Google Scholar

16. James, , Meaning of Truth, p. 7.Google Scholar

17. Rorty, , Truth and Progress, p. 292.Google Scholar

18. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, pp. xxvii–xxix.Google Scholar

19. Ibid., p. xxix.

20. Rorty, again cites James's, Essays, Comments, and Reviews in Works and compares it with Nietzsche's, Will to Power, sect. 514, on page 165n8 of Philosophy and Social Hope.Google Scholar

21. Rorty, , Consequences of Pragmatism, p. xxv.Google Scholar

22. Rorty, , Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, p. 13n26.Google Scholar

23. Ibid.

24. Rorty, Richard, “The Moral Purposes of the University,” The Hedgehog Review 2:3 (Fall 2000): 114.Google Scholar

25. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 150.Google Scholar

26. Rorty, , Consequences of Pragmatism, pp. xlii–xliii.Google Scholar

27. Rorty, , “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,” in The Revival of Pragmatism, ed. Dickstein, Morris (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 31.Google Scholar

28. Rorty, , Truth and Progress, p. 21.Google Scholar

29. James, , Pragmatism, p. 35.Google Scholar

30. “Religion in the Public Square: A Reconsideration,” The Journal of Religious Ethics 31:1:141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31. James, , Pragmatism, p. 99.Google Scholar

32. Putnam, , in The Cambridge Companion to William James, ed. Putnam, Ruth Anna (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Ibid.

34. James, , Meaning of Truth, p. viii.Google Scholar

35. See especially his essays “Does ‘Consciousness’ Exist?” and “The World of Pure Experience” in Essays in Radical Empiricism, in Works.

36. James, , Some Problems in Philosophy, in Works, chaps. 4, 5, 6.Google Scholar

37. Rorty has responded to those who think that his emphasis on the Darwinian account of man is essentialist since it insists that this picture is “true.” He writes that it is not that the Darwinian account is “true” in some nonpragmatic sense but that “in the spirit of Deweyan experimentation…it behooves us to give the self-image Darwin suggested to us a whirl, in the hope of having fewer philosophical problems on our hands” (Truth and Progress, p. 48).Google Scholar He “stoutly den[ies] thinking that Darwin describes reality … [but] his way of describing human beings, when supplemented (as Dewey and Davidson supplement it) by a story of cultural evolution, does give us a useful gimmick to prevent people from overdramatizing dichotomies and thereby generating philosophical problems. By pressing an analogy between growing a new organ and developing a new vocabulary, between stories about how the elephant got its trunk and stories about how the West got particle physics, we neo-Darwinians hope to fill our self-image sketched by the Romantic poets and partially filled in by Nietzsche and Dewey” (Truth and Progress, p. 152).Google Scholar

38. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. xxiii.Google Scholar

39. Rorty, , Essays on Heidegger, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

40. Ibid., p. 3.

41. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 266.Google Scholar

42. Ibid., p. 265.

43. Rorty, , Truth and Progress, p. 304.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 305.

45. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. xxxii.Google Scholar

46. Ibid., p. 68–69.

47. Perry, Ralph Barton, The Thought and Character of William James, 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948), 1: 475Google Scholar.

48. Hofstadter, Richard provides an excellent discussion of the impulse of James and pragmatism against Spencer in Chapter 7, “The Current of Pragmatism,” in Social Darwinism in American Thought (Boston: Beacon Press, 1944; revised edition, 1955Google Scholar).

49. Menand, Louis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001), p. 141Google Scholar. See also Barzun, Jacques, A Stroll with William James (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1983), pp. 209–14.Google Scholar

50. Review of Fink's, H. T. “Romantic Love and Personal Beauty,” Nation 22 (09 1887): 238Google Scholar.

51. Richards, , Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), p. 435Google Scholar.

52. James, , “Brute and Human Intellect,” in Writings 1878–1899 (New York: Library of America Press, 1992), pp. 910–49Google Scholar.

53. Richards, , Darwin, pp. 440–43Google Scholar.

54. James, , Essays in Philosophy, in Works, pp. 7–22Google Scholar.

55. Robinson, Daniel N., “William James on the Mind and the Body,” in Reinterpreting the Legacy of William James, ed. Donnelly, Margaret (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1992)Google Scholar.

56. James, , The Principles of Psychology, in Works, 1:143Google Scholar.

57. See Rorty's, best argument against the idea of consciousness in “Non-Reductive Physicalism” (1987), an essay found in Objectivity, Relativism, and TruthGoogle Scholar.

58. Myers, Gerald, William James: His Life and Thought (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986), p. 412Google Scholar.

59. Perry, , Thought and Character of William James, 1:493Google Scholar.

60. See especially, Rorty, , Achieving our Country: Leftist Thought in 20th Century America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998Google Scholar), and the essay “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism” (1999)Google Scholar.

61. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, pp. 150–54.Google Scholar

62. Ibid., pp. 149, 156.

63. The idea that we can simply “do without” the concept of mind, is an enduring Rortian theme. Rorty writes that “the aim of this book [Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature] is to undermine the reader's confidence in ‘the mind’ as something about which one should have a 'philosophical' view” (Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, p. 7Google Scholar).

64. “Contemporary Philosophy of Mind,” Synthese 53:2 (11 1982) 344Google Scholar.

65. Menand, , Metaphysical Club, p. 146Google Scholar.

66. Rorty, , Consequences of Pragmatism, p. xxxGoogle Scholar.

67. James, , Varieties of Religious Experience, in Works, p. 384Google Scholar.

68. Nietzsche, , The Gay Science, section 143, as quoted in “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,” pp. 21, 23Google Scholar.

69. Rorty, , “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,” p. 23Google Scholar.

70. Ibid., pp. 2–3.

71. Allison, Dorothy, Skin: Talking about Sex, Class, and Literature (Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books, 1994), p. 166Google Scholar. Quoted in Philosophy and Social Hope, 161Google Scholar.

72. See especially Rorty's, “The Inspirational Value of Great Works of Literature,” Achieving Our Country (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 125–40.Google Scholar

73. Rorty, , “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,”, p. 24Google Scholar.

74. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 160Google Scholar.

75. Tillich, Paul, Christianity and the Encounter of the World Religions (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), p. 4Google Scholar. Quoted in “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,” p. 32Google Scholar.

76. Rorty, , “Pragmatism as Romantic Polytheism,”, p. 29Google Scholar.

77. Rorty, , Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Essays on Heidegger, pp. 162Google Scholar.

78. Rorty, , Essays on Heidegger, p. 162Google Scholar.

79. James, , Will to Believe, p. 31Google Scholar.

80. James, , Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 405Google Scholar.

81. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 163Google Scholar.

82. James, , Will to Believe, p. 29Google Scholar, as quoted in Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 158Google Scholar.

83. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 160Google Scholar.

84. James, , Pragmatism, p. 55Google Scholar.

85. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, pp. 12–13Google Scholar.

86. “Letter to James Leuba, 1904,” in Perry, , Thought and Character of William James, 2:350–51Google Scholar.

87. For example, Perry, , Thought and Character of William James, 2:354Google Scholar; Bixler, Julius, Religion in the Philosophy of William James (Boston: Marshall Jones Company, 1962), p. 137Google Scholar; Levinson, Henry Samuel, The Religious Investigations of William James (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1981), pp. 166, 167, 279Google Scholar; Myers, p. 712m73.

88. James, , Varieties of Religious Experience, pp. 413, 414Google Scholar.

89. Rorty, , Philosophy and Social Hope, p. 156Google Scholar.

90. In the summer issue of The Review of Politics, Christopher Duncan argued that Rorty's brutal honesty about his distain for traditional American theism undermines his political goals “A Question for Richard Rorty,” The Review of Politics 66 [Summer 2004]Google Scholar. He writes that if Rorty learned to speak the language of American religion, even if he did not personally believe in it, he might make better inroads into American public life. Rorty has attempted, on a few occasions, to speak in favor of the “Social Gospel” Christianity of his maternal grandfather, Walter Rauschenbusch. Rorty believes that the Social Gospel could serve as a parallel American civil religion for the religiously-minded, once it is shorn of all of its theological components. See Philosophy and Social Hope, pp. 206, 249Google Scholar. It is doubtful, however, that the Social Gospel is sufficiently appealing to most contemporary American Christians to serve Rorty in the capacity that Duncan prescribes.

91. See the ongoing debates in neuroscience as typified by Wegner, Daniel in The Illusion of Conscious Will (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002)Google Scholar and Chalmers, David in The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar