Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T04:19:28.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limited Warfare and the Progress of European Civilization 1640–17401

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

Three hundred years ago the people of England were engaged is a terrible civil war. Among the young men then about to come of age was Robert Boyle (1627–1691). Except for Newton, he did more than any other Englishman of the late seventeenth century to make Great Britain the center of the great school of natural philosophy, whose achievements Voltaire was to insist constituted one of the chief glories of the age of Louis XIV. Boyle was horrified by war. He regarded it as a disease of human societies. In 1646 he wrote about it from London with touches of wisdom astonishing to hear, especially from a boy of nineteen. He had had conversations with a number of partisans of the House of Commons, with men who were destined to be on the winning side. Those who look forward to victory today as the solution of their troubles might meditate to advantage upon his words.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Boyle, , Works, (London. 1772), vol. I, p. xxxiGoogle Scholar.

3 Praissac, Sieur du, Briefe me'thode pour re'soudre facilemenl loute question mililaire, (Paris, 1614)Google Scholar; Les Questions militaires, (Paris, 1614)Google Scholar. The quotation is from the English translation of Praissac's, Les Discours mililaires of 1625 (The Art of Warre or Militarie Discourses, ed. by Cruso, John (Cambridge, 1639), p. 29)Google Scholar.

4 Earl of Orrery, A Treatise of the Art of War, (London, 1677), p. 15Google Scholar.

5 Morley, Henry, The Earlier Life and Chief Earlier Worlfs of Daniel Defoe, (London, 1889), p. 135Google Scholar.

6 Noorden, Carl von, Europäische Ceschtchte im achizehnien Jahrhunderi, (Düsseldorf, 1870), p. 575Google Scholar.

7 Husbandry and Trade lmprov'd, ed. Bradley, Richard, (2nd ed., London, 1728), vol. II. p. 128Google Scholar.

8 Defoe, An Essay upon Projects, in Morley, , op. cit., p. 135Google Scholar.

9 Guibert, Jacques A. H., Essai général de tactique, (Liége, 1775), vol. II, p. 68Google Scholar.

10 Discours politiques el militaires, (Basle, 1587), p. 260 ffGoogle Scholar.

11 In preparation for war, Henri IV is said to have increased the French army from 15,000 to 50,000 during the last year of his reign—1610 (Ed. de la Barre—Duparcq, , “Des Rapports entre la richesse et la puissance militaire des Etats, ” Seances el Travaux de l'Académle des Sciences Morales el Politiques vol. LXXXIV (1868) pp. 304–05Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., vol. LXXXV (1868), p. 51.

13 Cf. The Cambridge Modern History, vol. I, p. 213Google Scholar.

14 Guibert, , op. cit. vol. II, pp. 147–48Google Scholar.

15 Sombart's, argument concerning the role played by war in the rise of modem capitalism is set forth in Krieg and Kapitalismus, (Munich. 1913)Google Scholar. For the place mven war in relation to the other causes recognized by Sombait for the rise of modem capitalism, see Der Moderne Kapilalismus (4th edit.Munich. 1921)Google Scholar.

16 Mims, Steward L.. Colbert's West India Policy (New Haven. 1912). pp. 56Google Scholar.

17 Nef, , “Wars and the Rise of Industrial Civilization, 1640–1740,” pp. 4041Google Scholar.

18 Nef, . “War and Economic Progress, 1540–1640,” pp. 3536Google Scholar.

19 Nef, , “The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered,” Journal of Economic History, vol. III (1943), pp. 1823Google Scholar.

20 Nef, , “War and Economic Progress,” pp. 3536Google Scholar.

21 Evidence to support this thesis will be found in the works of Veblen, Tawney and others, as well as in a series of books and articles which I have published during the past ten years.

22 Courtecuisse, Maximilien, La Manufacture de draps fin Vanrobais (Paris, 1920), pp. 2Google Scholar, 2n., 70–77; 102–03; Inventaire sommaire des archives departmentales, Somme, (1888), vol. ii, pp. 6570Google Scholar.

23 Courlecuisse, . op. cit., pp. 7277Google Scholar, 102–03. 107–26; Inventaire sommaire des archives départmentales, Somme, vol. ii, pp. 70 ffGoogle Scholar.

24 Nef, , “The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered.” pp. 1314, 18 ffGoogle Scholar.

25 Scoville, Warren C., “The French Glass Industry, 1640–1740,” Journal of Economic History, vol. I (1941), pp. 158–59Google Scholar, 163–64, 167; State Policy and the French Glass Industry, 1640–1789,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. LVI (1942), pp. 430Google Scholar, 432, 446; Large-Scale Production in the French Plate-Glass Industry, 1665–1789,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. L (1942), pp. 673–74Google Scholar, 676, 679–80, 685–86, 691–92, 697; Labor and Labor Conditions in the French Glass Industry, 1643–1789,” Journal of Modern History, vol. XV (1943), pp. 279–80, 285–86, 288Google Scholar.

26 Star Chamber Proceedings (Public Record Office, London). James I, 310/16.

27 Southey, Robert, Life of John Wesley (2nd ed., London, 1820), pp. 235–39, 416 ffGoogle Scholar.

28 Decamps, Gonzales, Memoirc historique sur l'industrie houillère de Mons, Société des Sciences, des Arts el des Lettres du Hainaut, Publications (5th series, 1889), vol. I, p. 201Google Scholar.

29 Nef, . “Wars and the Rise of Industrial Civilization, 1640–1740,” pp. 6772Google Scholar.

30 Bruslons, Savary des, Dictionnaire universel de commerce (Geneva, 1742), vol. II, p. 495Google Scholar.

31 Muller, John, A Treatise of Artillery (1768), p. iiiGoogle Scholar. CfRobertson, F. L., The Evolution of Naval Armament (London, 1921), p. 89Google Scholar; Scharnhorst, G. von, Handbuch für Officiere, Erster Theil, Artillerie (Hanover, 1804), vol. I, pp. 1920Google Scholar.

32 Nef, , “Wars and the Rise of Industrial Civilization, 1640–1740,” pp. 55 ffGoogle Scholar.