Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T04:28:56.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Church and State in America: Toward a Biblically Derived Reformulation of Their Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

H. Mark Roelofs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article begins with a critique of the orthodox American doctrine calling for the separation of church and state, especially as this doctrine has been formulated by the United States Supreme Court. This doctrine is simplistic, dualistic, and merely jurisdictional; it is also much too narrowly tied to Hobbesian-Lockean liberal prejudices and their asocial vocabularies. The predominant American religious traditions (Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish) are all, at core, biblical, and a biblically derived reformulation of American thinking on church-state relationships would differ from the orthodox tradition in three fundamental respects: (1) far from a “separation” of church and state, these would be seen as partners in a shared world of national moral experience; (2) the religious element in this combination, as much as the political, would be understood in broad, social terms, not merely those of “private conscience”; (3) in their shared world, the specific relationships between church and state would be seen in ongoing, dialectical terms rooted in their necessarily conflicting visions of the nation's past, its problems, and its promises.

Type
Religion and Politics
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , Fall 1988 , pp. 561 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1955)Google Scholar; and Will, , Herberg, , Protestant, Catholic, Jew (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1955).Google Scholar

2. Winthrop, John, “A Model of Christian Charity,” in The American Puritans: Their Prose and Poetry, ed. Miller, Perry (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1956).Google Scholar

3. Hartz, , Liberal Tradition.Google Scholar

4. Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960), p. 368.Google Scholar

5. Bedell, George C. et al. , Religion in America (New York: Macmillan, 1982)Google Scholar; Bellah, Robert et al. , Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (New York: Harper and Row, 1985)Google Scholar; Cox, Harvey, Religion in the Secular City (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984).Google Scholar

6. Hinkley, Barbara,. The Symbolic Presidency (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1989).Google Scholar

7. Metz, Johann B., The Emergent Church, trans. Mann, Peter (New York: Crossroad, 1981).Google Scholar

8. Herberg, , Protestant, Catholic, Jew.Google Scholar

9. Berns, Walter, The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy (New York: Basic Books, 1976)Google Scholar; Barker, L. J. and Barker, T. W., Civil Liberties and the Constitution: Cases and Commentaries, 2nd ed. (Englewood, CA: Prentice Hall, 1975)Google Scholar; Laycock, Douglas, “A Legal and Constitutional Survey of Religious Liberty in the United States,” in Church and Society, ed. Lewis, Dean (05/ 06 1986).Google Scholar

10. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Oxford: Blackwell, 1951).Google Scholar

11. Ibid., chap. 42, p. 327.

12. Weber, Paul, “Religious Interest Groups, Policy Making, and the Constitution,” in The Political Role of Religion in the United States, ed. Johnson, S. D. and Tamney, J. B. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986).Google Scholar

13. Brown, R. M., The Unexpected News (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1984).Google Scholar

14. In the argument that follows, compare Yoder, John H., The Politics of Jesus (Grand Rapids: Erdmans, 1972), chaps. 9 and 10Google Scholar; also Casper, Charles B., “A Theological and Biblical Reflection on Religious Liberty,”Google ScholarLewis, , Church and SocietyGoogle Scholar; Little, David, “A Legal and Constitutional Survey of Religious Liberty in the United States,”Google Scholaribid.

15. Brown, R. M., Saying Yes and Saying No (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1985).Google Scholar

16. National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy (Washington, D. C, 1986), pp. xiv–xv.Google Scholar