Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:43:11.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the apple falls close to the tree: Local food systems and the preservation of diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Carol Goland  and
Sarah Bauer
Carol Goland*
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Program, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, USA.
Sarah Bauer
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Science Center, 601 Erieside Ave., Cleveland, OH 44114, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: goland@denison.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agricultural industrialization, Green Revolution technologies, environmental change and civil conflicts have all been cited as contributing to the erosion of crop biodiversity. An additional factor is change in the characteristics of markets, including distance to market. Proponents of sustainable agriculture claim that one benefit of local food systems is the preservation of crop biodiversity. This paper explores that claim, examining Ohio orchardists' understanding and valuation of apple varieties and relating these to the preservation of biodiversity. Growers provided lists of apple varieties and then performed pilesorts on them. Analysis using multidimensional scaling reveals the underlying dimensions growers use to distinguish those cultivars. Salient characteristics are taste, use and market focus. Demands of the conventional commercial market with regards to transportation, appearance and storage exclude the old varieties. On the other hand, there is a strong congruence between sales in local markets and production of old varieties. Local markets, such as roadside stands and ‘pick-your-own’ operations, play an important role in the preservation of heirloom varieties of apples.

Keywords

local food systemscrop biodiversityapple varietiessustainable food systemsheirloom varietiesniche markets
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 228 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Tuxill, J. 2000. The biodiversity that people made. Worldwatch May/June:24–35.Google Scholar
2El-Hage, S.Grandi, C. and Henatsch, C. 2002. Organic Agriculture and Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
3Tuxill, J. 1999. Nature's cornucopia: Our stake in plant diversity. Worldwatch Paper No. 148. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4Fowler, C. 1994. Unnatural Selection: Technology, Politics, and Plant Evolution. International Studies in Global Change 5. Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland.Google Scholar
5Wright, B.D. 1997. Crop genetic resource policy: the role of ex situ genebanks. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 41(1):81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Zhu, Y.Wang, Y.Chen, H. and Lu, B. 2003. Conserving traditional rice varieties through management for crop diversity. BioScience 53(2):158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Prance, G.T. 1997. The conservation of botanical diversity. In Maxted, N.Ford-Lloyd, B.V. and Hawkes, J.G. (eds). Plant Genetic Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London. p. 3–14.Google Scholar
8Kebebew, F.Tsehaye, Y. and McNeilly, T. 2001. Morphological and farmers cognitive diversity of barley (Hordeum valgare L. [Poaceae]) at Bale and North Shewa of Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48(5):467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Orlove, B.S. and Brush, S.B. 1996. Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 25:329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wood, D. and Lenné, J.M. 1997. The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Oldfield, M.L. and Alcorn, J.B. 1987. Conservation of traditional agroecosystems. BioScience 37:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Cleveland, D.A.Soleri, D. and Smith, S.E. 1994. Do folk crop varieties have a role in sustainable agriculture? BioScience 44:740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 1996. Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: prepared for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, Germany, 17–23 June 1996. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
14Bellon, M.R. 2004. Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Development 32(1):159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Brush, S.B.Tadesse, D. and Van Dusen, E. 2003. Crop diversity in peasant and industrialized agriculture: Mexico and California. Society and Natural Resources 16:123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Brush, S.B. 1992. Reconsidering the green revolution: diversity and stability in cradle areas of crop domestication. Human Ecology 20(2):145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Richards, P. and Ruivenkamp, G. 1997. Seeds and Survival: Crop Genetic Resources in War and Reconstruction in Africa. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.Google Scholar
18Altieri, M.A. and Merrick, L.C. 1988. Agroecology and in situ conservation of native crop diversity in the Third World. In Wilson, E.O. and Peter, F.M. (eds). Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 361–369.Google Scholar
19Durning, A.T. 1992. Guardians of the land: Indigenous Peoples and the Health of the Earth. Worldwatch Paper No. 112. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
20National Research Council. 1972. Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
21Goland, C. 1993. Field scattering as agricultural risk management: a case study from Cuyo Cuyo, Department of Puno, Peru. Mountain Research and Development 13(4):317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Zimmerer, K.S. 1991. The regional biogeography of native potato cultivars in highland Peru. Journal of Biogeography 18:165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Brush, S.Kesseli, R.Ortega, R.Cisneros, P.Zimmerer, K. and Quiros, C. 1995. Potato diversity in the Andean center of crop domestication. Conservation Biology 9(5):1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Kloppenburg, J. Jr,Hendrickson, J. and Stevenson, G.W. 1996. Coming into the foodshed. In Vitek, W. and Jackson, W. (eds). Rooted in the Land, Essays on Community and Place. Yale University Press, New Haven CT. p. 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Pirog, R. and Benjamin, A. 2003. Checking the food odometer: comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Available at Website: http://www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/files/food_travel072103.pdf (verified 20 April 2004).Google Scholar
26Feenstra, G.W. 1997. Local food systems and sustainable communities. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(1):28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Berry, W. 1995. Another Turn of the Crank. Counterpoint, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
28Norberg-Hodge, H. 2002. Global monoculture. In Kimbrell, A. (ed.). The Fatal Harvest Reader. Island Press, Washington, DC. p. 58–64.Google Scholar
29Halweil, B. 2002. Home Grown: The Case for Local Food in a Global Market. Worldwatch Paper No. 163. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30Fowler, C. and Mooney, P. 1990. Shattering: Food, Politics, and the Loss of Genetic Diversity. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
31Bellon, M.R. 1997. On-farm conservation as a process: an analysis of its components. In L. Sperling and M. Loevinsohn (eds). Using Diversity: Enhancing and Maintaining Genetic Resources On-Farm. International Development Research Centre. Available at Website: http://www.idrc.ca/library/document/104582/bellon.html (verified 11 May 2004).Google Scholar
32Weller, S.C. and Romney, A.K. 1988. Systematic Data Collection. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Kruskal, J. and Wish, M. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Sage University Papers Series. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 11. Sage Publications, Beverly Hill, CA.Google Scholar
34Borgatti, S. 1992. ANTHROPAC 4.0. Analytic Technologies, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
35Borgatti, S. 1992. ANTHROPAC 4.0 Methods Guide. Analytic Technologies, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
36Bash, W. and Miller, D. 1999. A summary of Ohio Fruit Growers Society apple cider competition, 1993–1997. In Schreens, S. C. (ed.). Fruit Crops: A Summary of Research 1998. Research Circular No. 299. Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio.Google Scholar
37Barritt, B. 1999. Apple varieties and the consumer–adapting to change. Good Fruit Grower 50(3):9–15.Google Scholar
38Warner, G. 1999. Diversification will help B.C. fruit growers survive. Good Fruit Grower 50(1):16–17.Google Scholar
39Ellenwood, C.W. and Shoemaker, J.S. 1933. Dependable Fruits: Varieties for Commercial and Home Use. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin #528, Wooster, OH.Google Scholar
40Hampson, C.R. and Kemp, H. 2003. Characteristics of important commercial apple cultivars. In Ferree, D.C. and Warrington, I.J. (eds). Apples: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing, New York. p. 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Morgan, J. and Richards, A. 1993. The Book of Apples. Ebury Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar