Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:12:24.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Greenhouse gas emissions from the production of cereals and livestock across high-, middle- and low-income countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2021

Azmat Gani*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 20, Al Khod 123, Muscat, Oman
*
Author for correspondence: Azmat Gani, E-mail: azmat@squ.edu.om

Abstract

This study examines the effect of cereal and livestock production-induced greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) across high-, middle- and low-income countries from 2002 to 2016. A structural equation formulated within an environmental modeling framework is tested using the balanced panel-corrected standard errors estimation procedure. The findings showed that total food production is strongly correlated with methane and nitrous oxide in high-income countries and nitrous oxide emissions in middle-income countries. After disaggregating total food production into cereal and livestock production, the findings revealed that cereal production is positively and statistically significantly correlated with nitrous oxide emissions in high- and middle-income countries. The findings also confirmed that livestock production is positively and statistically significantly correlated with methane and nitrous oxide emissions in high-income countries. Incomes, industrial expansion, forest cover and education are other strong common determinants of GHGs in all three income categories of countries. The prime policy implication of this finding is the need for the food producers to transit toward environmentally cleaner and sustainable food production systems that mitigate GHGs and improve environmental performance and comply with the broader objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 12, 13 and 15 (United Nations, 2015a, p. 3) relating to sustainable production, climate action and life on land, respectively.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, C, Knill, C and Fernandez-i-Marin, X (2016) Rule growth and government effectiveness: why it takes the capacity to learn and co-ordinate to constrain the rule growth. Policy Science 50, 241268, Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11077-016-9265-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armenteras, D, Guillermo, R, Nelly, R, Sonia, S and Milton, R (2006) Patterns and causes of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. Ecological Indicators 6, 353368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspergis, N and Ozturk, I (2015) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators 52, 1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajzelj, B, Richards, K S, Allwood, J M, Smith, P, Dennis, J S, Curmi, E and Gilligan, C A (2014) Importance of food demand management for climate mitigation. Nature Climate Change 4, 924929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, D, Kebreab, E and Mitloehner, FM (2016) Mitigation of enteric emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies. Climate Change 137, 467480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chankrajang, T and Muttarak, R (2017) Green returns to education: does schooling contribute to pro-environmental behaviours? Evidence from Thailand. Ecological Economics 131, 434448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, A, Streck, C, Roe, S, Zurek, M, Haupt, F and Dolginow, A (2014) Strategies For Mitigating Climate Change in Agriculture: Abridged Report. Climate Focus and California Environmental Associates, prepared with the support of the climate and Land Use Alliance Report and Supplementary Materials, Available at https://www.agriculturalmitigation.org.Google Scholar
Dietz, T and Rosa, EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review 1, 277300.Google Scholar
Drabo, A (2017) Climate change mitigation and agricultural development models: primary commodity exports or local consumption production? Ecological Economics 137, 110125, Available at https://ferdi.fr/publications/climate-change-mitigation-and-agricultural-development-models-primary-commodity-exports-or-local-consumption-production.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, PR and Holdren, JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171, 12121217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmerson, M, Morales, MB, Oñate, JJ, Batáry, P, Berendse, F, Liira, J, Aavik, T, Guerrero, I, Bommarco, R, Eggers, S, Pärt, T, Tscharntke, T, Weisser, W, Clement, L and Bengtsson, J (2016) How agricultural intensification affects biodiversity and ecosystem services. In Dumbrell Alex, J, Kordas Rebecca, L and Guy, W (eds), Advances in Ecological Research, 55. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 4397.Google Scholar
Farhani, S and Ozturk, I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanisation in Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22, 1566315676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Amador, O, Francois, JF, Oberdabernig, DA and Tomberger, P (2020) The methane footprint of nations: stylised facts from a global panel dataset. Ecological Economics 170, 106528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flohre, A, Hänke, S, Fischer, C, Geiger, F, Bengtsson, J, Berendse, F, Weisser, WW, Emmerson, M, Ceryngier, P, Liira, J, Tscharntke, T, Winqvist, C, Eggers, S, Bommarco, R, Pärt, T, Bretagnolle, V, Plantegenest, M, Clement, LW, Dennis, C, Palmer, C, Morales, MB, Onate, JJ, Guerrero, I, Hawro, V, Aavik, T, Thies, C and Inchausti, P (2011) Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecological Applications 21, 17721781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Agriculture Organisation (2019) How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: FAO. Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation (2020) FAOSTAT. Available at www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.Google Scholar
Frankel, JA and Rose, AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics Statistics 87, 8591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, M and Koch, M (2016) Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: structural challenges for a global steady-state economy. Global Environmental Change 38, 4148, Available at http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8812574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, LR and Mendez, RA (1998) The empirical relationship between trade, growth and environment. International Review of Economics and Finance 7, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Henderson, B, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A and Tempio, G (2013) Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock—A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3437e.pdf.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ and Garnett, T (2014) Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B 369, 20120273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golzar, F, Heeran N, Hellweg S and Roshandel R (2019) A comparative study on the impact of greenhouse gases: a probabilistic approach. Science of the Total Environment 675, 560569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouel, C and Guimbard, H (2019) Nutrition transition and the structure of global food demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101, 383403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, GM and Krueger, AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free-trade agreement, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3194.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Henderson B, Havlik P, Thornton PK, Conant RT, Smith P, Wirsenius S, Hristor AN, Gerber P, Gill M, Butterbach-Bahl k, Valin H, Garnett T and Stehfest E (2016) Greenhouse gases mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change 6, 452461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, S, Rothstein, B and Nasirtousi, N (2009) Quality of government: what you get? Annual Review of Political Science 12, 135161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D and Seldeon, TM (1995) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57, 85101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDDRI (2019–2020) Annual Report 19–20. Paris: IDDRI.Google Scholar
IPCC (2006) Greenhouse Gas Inventory: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Bracknell, UK, Geneva: United Kingdom Meteorological Office.Google Scholar
IPCC (2019) Global Warming of 1.5 Degrees C. IPCC. Geneva. Available at https://ipcc.ch/sr15.Google Scholar
IPCC (2020) Climate Change and Land. IPCC. Geneva. Available online at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2020/02/SPM_Updated-Jan20.pdf.Google Scholar
IUCN (2017) Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Issues in Brief. IUCN. Gland. Available at https://iucn.org/sites/dev/files/deforestation-forest-degradation-issues-brief-final.pdf.Google Scholar
Ivanova, D, Vita, G, Wood, R, Lausselet, C, Dumitru, A, Krause, K, Macsinga, I and EG, Hertwich (2018) Carbon mitigation in domains of high consumer lock-in. Global Environmental Change 52, 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayet, PA and Petel, E (2015) Economic valuation of the nitrogen content of urban organic residue by the agricultural sector. Ecological Economics 120, 272281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jebli, MB, Youssef, SB and Ozturk, I (2016) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade-in OECD countries. Ecological Indicators 60, 824831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, X and Chen, B (2017) Assessing the energy-saving effect or urbanisation in China based on stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model. Journal of Cleaner Production 163, S306S314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khuc, QV, Tran BQ, Meyfroidt P and Paschke MW (2018) Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: an exploratory analysis at the national level. Forest Policy and Economics 90, 128141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D, Guo, X and Xiao, B (2019) What causes growth of global greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from 40 countries. Science of the Total Environment 661, 750766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, J, Cain, M, Frame, D and Pierrehumbert, R (2021) Agriculture's contribution to climate change and role in mitigation is distinct from predominantly fossil CO2-emitting sectors, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4, Article 518039. Available at https://www.forntiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039/full.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, W (2019) Economic growth, convergence and agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics 50, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikayilov, JI, Hasanov, FJ and Galeotti, M (2018) Decoupling of CO2 emissions and GDP: a time-varying cointegration approach. Ecological Indicators 95, 615628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, C, Spirandelli D, Franklin EC, Lynhan J, Kantar MB, Miles W, Smith CZ, Fred K, May J, Louis LV, Barba EW, Bettinger K, Frazier AG, Colburn IX JF, Hanasaki N, Hawkins E, Hirabayashi Y, Knorr W, Little CM, Emanuel K, Sheffield J, Jonathan AP, and Cynthia LH (2018) Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Climate Change 8, 10621071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, SM, Olander L, Wollenberg L, Rosentock T, Tubiello F, Paustian K, Buendia L, Nihart A and Smith P (2014) Reducing gas emissions and adapting agricultural management for climate change in developing countries: providing the basis for action. Global Change Biology 20, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2021) Trade and the Environment. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Paris. Available at https://www.oecd.org/trade/topics/trade-and-the-environment.Google Scholar
Ozturk, I and Acaravci, A (2011) Electricity consumption and real GDP causality nexus: evidence from the ARDL bounds testing approach for 11 MENA countries. Applied Energy 88, 28852892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, I, Al-Mulali, U and Saboori, B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23, 19161928. Available at http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/74452/.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauw, K and Thurlow, J (2011) Agricultural growth, poverty, and nutrition in Tanzania. Food Policy 36, 795804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendrill, F, Persson UM, Godar J, Kastner T, Moran D, Schmidt S and Wood R (2019) Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Global Environmental Change 56, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porfirio, LL, Newth, D, Finnigan, JJ and Cai Y (2018) Economic shifts in agricultural production and trade due to climate change, Palgrave Communications, 4, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, D and Meng, Y (2018) Does schooling foster environmental values and action? A cross-national study or priorities and behaviours. International Journal of Educational Development 60, 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinert, KA (2015) Food security as basic goods provisions. World Medical and Health Policy 7, 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, WJ, Smith P, Haber H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C and Boucher DH (2013) Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Climate Change 4, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, S, Streck C, Obersteiner M, Frank S, Griscom B, Drouet L, Fricko O, Gusti M, Harris N, Hasegawa T, Hausfather Z, Havlik P, House J, Nabuurs J, Popp A, Sanchez MJS, Sanderman J, Smith P, Stehfest E and Lawrence D (2019) Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5'C world. Nature Climate Change 9, 817828. Available at https://www.ccacoalition.org/es/resources/ruminants-climate-change-and-climate-policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkodie, SA and Strezov, V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment 646, 862871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahbaz, M, Sarwar, S, Chen, W and Malik, MN (2017) Dynamics of electricity consumption, oil price and economic growth: a global perspective. Energy Policy 108, 256270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkey, J, Meyer, S, Still, KS and Leuschner, C (2012) The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. The Royal Society 279, 14211429.Google ScholarPubMed
Stroup, MD (2006) Economic freedom, democracy and the quality of life. World Development 35, 5266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sueyoshi, T, Yuan, Y and Goto, M (2017) A literature study for DEA applied energy and environment. Energy Economics 62, 104124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theurl, , Lauk, C, Kalt, G, Mayer, A, Kaltenegger, K, Morais, TG, Teixeira, RFM, Domingos, T, Winiwarter, W, Erb, K-H, Habert, H (2020) Food systems in a zero-deforestation world: dietary change is more important than intensification for climate targets in 2050. Science of the Total Environment 735, 139353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The World Bank (2013) Forests and Environment. The World Bank. Washington, D.C. Available online at: https://worldbank.org/en/topic/forests/brief/forests-and-envrionment.Google Scholar
The World Bank (2020) World Development Indicators. The World Bank. Washington, D.C. Available online at: http://www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
Torras, M (2005) Income and power inequality as determinants of environmental and health outcomes: some findings. Social Science Quarterly 86, 13541376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2015a) World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD edition. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
United Nations (2015b) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations: New York, Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.Google Scholar
United Nations (2021) Climate and Environment. United Nations. New York. Retrieved on 7 May 2021 from https://www.news.un.org/en/story/2021/05/1091402.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2021) Global Methane Assessment: Benefits and Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Valin, H, Sands, RD, van der Mensbrugghe, D, Nelson, GC, Ahammad, H, Blanc, E, Bordirsky, B, Fujimori, S, Hasegawa, T, Havlik, P, Heyhoe, E, Kyle, P, Mason-D'Croz, D, Paltsev, S, Rolinski, S, Tabeau, A, van Meijl, H, von Lampe, M, Willenbockel, D (2014) The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics 45, 5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Werf, GR, Morton, DC, DeFries, RS, Olivier, JGJ, Kasibhatla, PS, Jackson, RB, Collatz, GJ, Randerson, JT (2009) CO2 Emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience 2, 737738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S, Li, Q, Fang, C and Zhou, C (2016) The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment 542, 360371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, H and Sciubba, HD (2019) The effect of population growth on the environment: evidence from European regions. European Journal of Population 35, 379402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wendland, KJ, Lewis, DJ and Alix-Garcia, J (2014) The effect of decentralised governance on timber extraction in European Russia. Environment and Resource Economics 57, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organisation (2021) The Impact of Trade Opening on Climate Change. World Trade Organisation. Geneva. Available at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop-e/envir_e/climate_impact_e.htm.Google Scholar
Xiong, C, Chen, S and Huang, R (2019) Extended STIRPAT model-based driving factor analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Kazakhstan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 16, 15920-15930. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04951-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C and Lin, Y (2012) Panel estimation for urbanisation, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 49, 488498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar